IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v16y2023i2d10.1007_s40271-022-00608-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Perception of Women in Rural and Remote Scotland About Intrapartum Care: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Verity Watson

    (University of Aberdeen)

  • Helen Bryers

    (NHS Highland
    University of Aberdeen)

  • Nicolas Krucien

    (University of Aberdeen)

  • Seda Erdem

    (University of Stirling)

  • Mary Burnside

    (NHS Highland)

  • Hugo C. Woerden

    (University of the Highlands and Islands
    Ulster University)

Abstract

Background The views of mothers are important in shaping policy and practice regarding options for intrapartum care. Mothers in rural and remote areas face unique challenges accessing services, and these need to be well understood. Therefore, our aim was to understand the compromises that women who live in remote and rural settings, more than 1 h from a maternity unit, face regarding intrapartum care. Methods Qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 14) were undertaken in rural Scotland with 13 women who had young children and one who was pregnant. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed by two researchers. Results Key themes identified were women’s perceptions about risk and the safety of different pathways of maternity care and birth locations; the actual and perceived distance between home and the place of birth, and the type of maternity care available at a place of birth. Mothers in rural and remote areas face particular challenges in choosing where to have their babies. In addition to clinical decisions about ‘place of birth’ agreed with healthcare professionals, they have to mentally juggle the implications of giving birth when at a distance from family support and away from familiar surroundings. It was clear that many women from rural communities have a strong sense of ‘place’ and that giving birth in a geographical location, community and culture that feels familiar is important to many of them. Conclusions Health care staff need to appreciate the impact of non-clinical factors that are important to mothers in remote and rural areas and acknowledge these, even when they cannot be accommodated. Local and national policy also needs to reflect and respond to the practical challenges faced by rurality.

Suggested Citation

  • Verity Watson & Helen Bryers & Nicolas Krucien & Seda Erdem & Mary Burnside & Hugo C. Woerden, 2023. "The Perception of Women in Rural and Remote Scotland About Intrapartum Care: A Qualitative Study," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 16(2), pages 117-125, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00608-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00608-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-022-00608-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-022-00608-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis E. Loría-Rebolledo & Hugo C. Woerden & Helen Bryers & Seda Erdem & Verity Watson, 2024. "Preferences of Recent Mums in Remote and Rural Areas for Type of Intrapartum Care: A Discrete Choice Experiment," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 17(6), pages 663-672, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:16:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s40271-022-00608-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.