Author
Listed:
- Xavier Calvet
(Corporació Sanitaria Universitària Parc Taulí)
- Fransesc Casellas
(Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron)
- Roberto Saldaña
(ACCU)
- Daniel Carpio
(Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Galicia Sur (IBI))
- Miguel Mínguez
(Hospital Clínico Universitario, University of Valencia)
- Isabel Vera
(Hospital Universitario de Puerta de Hierro)
- Laura Marín
(Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol)
- Berta Juliá
(Medical Department MSD)
Abstract
Background Measuring quality of care (QoC) from a patient’s perspective is becoming increasingly important in inflammatory bowel disease. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether patients’ evaluations of QoC correlate with better inflammatory bowel disease outcomes. Methods A survey including patients’ characteristics, a decalogue of QoC indicators, and self-reported disease outcomes was completed by Spanish patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A QoC index (QoCI) was constructed with the sum of the “yes” answers in the decalogue. We evaluated the correlation of QoCI with outcomes. A sub-analysis comparing patients with high QoCI vs those with low QoCI was performed (QoCI = 10 or ≤ 7). Results Seven hundred and eighty-eight questionnaires were analyzed. Mean age of participants was 43.4 years (63% women). Mean QoCI was 8.1 (± 2.4). The QoCI correlated significantly with activity of the disease, number of flares, emergency/unscheduled visits, and disease control. Patients scoring in the first QoCI quartile reported a decreased rate of moderate/severe disease (34.8% vs 55.3%, p
Suggested Citation
Xavier Calvet & Fransesc Casellas & Roberto Saldaña & Daniel Carpio & Miguel Mínguez & Isabel Vera & Laura Marín & Berta Juliá, 2021.
"Patient-Evaluated Quality of Care is Related to Better Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outcomes: The IQCARO II Project,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(5), pages 625-634, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00500-8
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00500-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-021-00500-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.