Author
Listed:
- Rob Arbuckle
(Adelphi Values, Adelphi Mill)
- Patricia Halstead
(McNeil Consumer Healthcare, a Division of Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.)
- Chris Marshall
(Adelphi Values, Adelphi Mill)
- Brenda Zimmerman
(McNeil Consumer Healthcare, a Division of Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.)
- Kate Bolton
(Adelphi Values, Adelphi Mill)
- Antoine Regnault
(Modus Outcomes)
- Cathy Gelotte
(McNeil Consumer Healthcare, a Division of Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc.)
Abstract
Objectives Given the lack of validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments assessing cold symptoms, a new pediatric PRO instrument was developed to assess multiple cold symptoms: the Child Cold Symptom Questionnaire (CCSQ). The objective of this research was to evaluate the measurement properties of the CCSQ. Methods This observational study involved daily completion of the self-report CCSQ by children aged 6–11 years in their home for 7 days. These data were used to develop a scoring algorithm and item-scale structure and evaluate the psychometric properties of the resulting scores. Analyses included evaluation of item and dimensionality performance (item response distributions and confirmatory factor analysis) and assessment of test–retest reliability in stable patients, construct validity (convergent and known groups validity), and preliminary responsiveness. Qualitative exit interviews in a subgroup of the children with colds and their parents were conducted. Results More than 90% of children had no missing data during the testing period, reflecting an excellent completion rate. For most items, responses were distributed across the options, with approximately normal distributions. Test–retest reliability was adequate, with intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.83. A logical pattern of correlations with the validated Strep-PRO instrument provided evidence supporting convergent validity. Single- and multi-item symptom scores distinguished between children who differed in their cold severity based on global ratings, providing evidence of known groups validity. Preliminary evidence indicates the CCSQ is responsive to changes over time. Conclusions The findings demonstrate that the CCSQ items and multi-item scores provide valid and reliable patient-reported measures of cold symptoms in children aged 6–11 years. They provide strong evidence supporting the validity of these items and multi-item scores for inclusion as endpoints in clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of cold medicines.
Suggested Citation
Rob Arbuckle & Patricia Halstead & Chris Marshall & Brenda Zimmerman & Kate Bolton & Antoine Regnault & Cathy Gelotte, 2021.
"Testing and Psychometric Validation of a Pediatric Instrument to Self-Assess Symptoms of the Common Cold,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(1), pages 101-117, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00462-3
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00462-3
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:14:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00462-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.