Author
Listed:
- Marie-Eve Poitras
(Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Saguenay
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean
Centre de Recherche Charles-LeMoyne-Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean Sur Les Innovations en Santé)
- France Légaré
(Université Laval
Population Health and Practice-Changing Research, CHU de Québec, Université Laval)
- Vanessa Tremblay Vaillancourt
(Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Saguenay
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean
Centre de Recherche Charles-LeMoyne-Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean Sur Les Innovations en Santé)
- Isabelle Godbout
(Université du Québec à Montréal)
- Annie Poirier
(Université Laval)
- Karina Prévost
(Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean)
- Claude Spence
(Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Saguenay)
- Maud-Christine Chouinard
(Université du Québec à Chicoutimi)
- Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
(Université Laval
Université Laval)
- Lobna Khadhraoui
(Université Laval)
- José Massougbodji
(Université Laval)
- Mathieu Bujold
(McGill University)
- Pierre Pluye
(McGill University)
- Catherine Hudon
(Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Saguenay
Université de Sherbrooke)
Abstract
Background Some patients with complex healthcare needs become high users of healthcare services. Case management allows these patients and their interprofessional team to work together to evaluate their needs, priorities and available resources. High-user patients must make an informed decision when choosing whether to engage in case management and currently there is no tool to support them. Objective The objective of this study was to develop and conduct a pilot alpha testing of a patient decision aid that supports high-user patients with complex needs and the teams who guide those patients in shared decision making when engaging in case management. Methods We chose a user-centered design to co-develop a patient decision aid with stakeholders informed by the Ottawa Research Institute and International Patient Decision Aid Standards frameworks. Perceptions and preferences for the patient decision aid’s content and format were assessed with patients and clinicians and were iteratively collected through interviews and focus groups. We developed a prototype and assessed its acceptability by using a think-aloud method and a questionnaire with three patient-partners, six clinicians and seven high-user patients with complex needs. Results The three rounds of evaluation to assess the decision aid’s acceptability highlighted comments related to simplicity, readability and visual aspect. A section presenting clinical vignettes including story telling was identified as the most helpful. Conclusions We created and evaluated a patient decision aid. Considering the positive comments, we believe that this aid has the potential to help high-user patients with complex care needs make better choices concerning case management.
Suggested Citation
Marie-Eve Poitras & France Légaré & Vanessa Tremblay Vaillancourt & Isabelle Godbout & Annie Poirier & Karina Prévost & Claude Spence & Maud-Christine Chouinard & Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun & Lobna , 2020.
"High Users of Healthcare Services: Development and Alpha Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Case Management,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(6), pages 757-766, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00465-0
DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00465-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00465-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.