IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v13y2020i5d10.1007_s40271-020-00427-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility

Author

Listed:
  • Michiel A. Greidanus

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Angela G. E. M. Boer

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Angelique E. Rijk

    (Maastricht University)

  • Sonja Brouwers

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Theo M. Reijke

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Marie José Kersten

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Jean H. G. Klinkenbijl

    (Gelre Hospital
    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Roy I. Lalisang

    (Maastricht University Medical Centre)

  • Robert Lindeboom

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Patricia J. Zondervan

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Sietske J. Tamminga

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

Background Cancer survivors’ perspectives on a successful return to work (RTW) may not be captured in the common measure of RTW, namely time until RTW. Objective The purpose of this study was therefore to develop an RTW outcome measure that reflects employed cancer survivors’ perspectives, with items that could be influenced by an employer, i.e. the Successful Return-To-Work questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS), and to assess its construct validity and reproducibility. Methods First, three focus groups with cancer survivors (n = 14) were organized to generate issues that may constitute successful RTW. Second, a two-round Delphi study among 108 cancer survivors was conducted to select the most important issues. Construct validity of the I-RTW_CS was assessed using correlations with a single-item measure of successful RTW and the Quality of Working Life Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (QWLQ-CS; n = 57). Reproducibility (test–retest reliability) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC; n = 50). Results Forty-eight issues were generated, of which seven were included: ‘enjoyment in work’; ‘work without affecting health’; ‘confidence of employer without assumptions about work ability’; ‘open communication with employer’; ‘feeling welcome at work’; ‘good work–life balance’; and ‘joint satisfaction with the situation (employer and cancer survivor)’. Correlations with single-item successful RTW and QWLQ-CS were 0.58 and 0.85, respectively. The reproducibility showed an ICC of 0.72. Conclusions The I-RTW_CS provides an RTW outcome measure that includes cancer survivors’ perspectives and weights its items on an individual basis, allowing a more meaningful evaluation of cancer survivors’ RTW. This study provides preliminary evidence for its construct validity and reproducibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Michiel A. Greidanus & Angela G. E. M. Boer & Angelique E. Rijk & Sonja Brouwers & Theo M. Reijke & Marie José Kersten & Jean H. G. Klinkenbijl & Roy I. Lalisang & Robert Lindeboom & Patricia J. Zonde, 2020. "The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 13(5), pages 567-582, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00427-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00427-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-020-00427-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-020-00427-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bertrand Porro & Mario Campone & Philippe Moreau & Yves Roquelaure, 2022. "Supporting the Return to Work of Breast Cancer Survivors: From a Theoretical to a Clinical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Masamitsu Kobayashi & Jun Kako & Kohei Kajiwara & Ayako Ogata, 2021. "Letter to the Editor in response to Greidanus et al., June 2020, “The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility”," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(1), pages 139-140, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:13:y:2020:i:5:d:10.1007_s40271-020-00427-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.