IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i4d10.1007_s40271-017-0251-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Ostermann

    (University of South Carolina
    Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University)

  • Derek S. Brown

    (Washington University in St. Louis)

  • Esther W. Bekker-Grob

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam
    University Medical Centre)

  • Axel C. Mühlbacher

    (Hochschule Neubrandenburg
    Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University)

  • Shelby D. Reed

    (Duke University)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Ostermann & Derek S. Brown & Esther W. Bekker-Grob & Axel C. Mühlbacher & Shelby D. Reed, 2017. "Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 511-514, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0251-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fern Terris‐Prestholt & Matthew Quaife & Peter Vickerman, 2016. "Parameterising User Uptake in Economic Evaluations: The role of discrete choice experiments," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25, pages 116-123, February.
    2. Jennifer Anne Whitty & Liana Fraenkel & Christopher S. Saigal & Catharina G. M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn & Dean A. Regier & Deborah A. Marshall, 2017. "Assessment of Individual Patient Preferences to Inform Clinical Practice," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 519-521, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chandoevwit, Worawan & Wasi, Nada, 2020. "Incorporating discrete choice experiments into policy decisions: Case of designing public long-term care insurance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Benjamin M. Craig & Emily Lancsar & Axel C. Mühlbacher & Derek S. Brown & Jan Ostermann, 2017. "Health Preference Research: An Overview," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(4), pages 507-510, August.
    3. Mandeville, Kate L. & Hanson, Kara & Muula, Adamson S. & Dzowela, Titha & Ulaya, Godwin & Lagarde, Mylène, 2017. "Specialty training for the retention of Malawian doctors: A cost-effectiveness analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 87-95.
    4. Matthew Quaife & Fern Terris-Prestholt & Gian Luca Di Tanna & Peter Vickerman, 2018. "How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(8), pages 1053-1066, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0251-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.