IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v45y2023i2d10.1007_s00291-022-00692-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the closest most productive scale size unit in data envelopment analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Eshagh Esfandiar

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Robabeh Eslami

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Mohammad Khoveyni

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Alireza Gilani

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

Finding the closest most productive scale size (MPSS) unit is an important issue in the data envelopment analysis (DEA) literature. The closest MPSS unit to the decision-making unit (DMU) under evaluation may be one of the existing (actually) observed MPSS units in the production technology. Also, finding the closest (actually) observed MPSS unit to the DMU under evaluation causes this DMU can easily achieve the optimal size for improving its performance because, in this case, the closest MPSS unit is only selected from the (actually) observed MPSS units. Hence, the manager (or decision-maker) of the DMU is more interested in considering the closest (actually) observed MPSS unit as a more accessible reference unit for his/her DMU than the closest non-observed MPSS unit. Hitherto several DEA-based models have been presented to determine the closest MPSS unit for the DMU under evaluation. However, the closest unit obtained from these models may not be MPSS, and also, this unit may not be one of the existing (actually) observed MPSS units in the technology. These problems indicate the drawbacks of these models. Hence, this research contributes to DEA by proposing three linear DEA-based models to tackle these drawbacks. Identifying the closest (actually) observed MPSS unit to the DMU under evaluation can be also used as a criterion for ranking the (actually) observed MPSS units as reference units for this DMU in the technology. This study also clarifies the managerial and economic implications of identifying the closest (observed) MPSS unit. Moreover, three numerical examples are given to illustrate the drawbacks of the previous models. Finally, a numerical illustration and an empirical application are provided to highlight the use of the proposed models.

Suggested Citation

  • Eshagh Esfandiar & Robabeh Eslami & Mohammad Khoveyni & Alireza Gilani, 2023. "Identifying the closest most productive scale size unit in data envelopment analysis," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 45(2), pages 623-660, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:45:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-022-00692-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-022-00692-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-022-00692-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-022-00692-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahoo, Biresh K & Khoveyni, Mohammad & Eslami, Robabeh & Chaudhury, Pradipta, 2016. "Returns to scale and most productive scale size in DEA with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 545-558.
    2. A. Davoodi & M. Zarepisheh & H. Rezai, 2015. "The nearest MPSS pattern in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 163-176, March.
    3. Banker, Rajiv D., 1984. "Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 35-44, July.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Lee, Chia-Yen, 2016. "Most productive scale size versus demand fulfillment: A solution to the capacity dilemma," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 954-962.
    6. Banker, Rajiv D. & Chang, Hsihui & Cooper, William W., 1996. "Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 473-481, March.
    7. Wang, Ying-Ming & Lan, Yi-Xin, 2013. "Estimating most productive scale size with double frontiers data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 182-186.
    8. Kao, Chiang, 2010. "Congestion measurement and elimination under the framework of data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 257-265, February.
    9. J Zhu, 2000. "Setting scale efficient targets in DEA via returns to scale estimation method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(3), pages 376-378, March.
    10. G Appa & M Yue, 1999. "On setting scale efficient targets in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(1), pages 60-69, January.
    11. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    12. Khodabakhshi, M., 2009. "Estimating most productive scale size with stochastic data in data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 968-973, September.
    13. Fukuyama, Hirofumi, 2003. "Scale characterizations in a DEA directional technology distance function framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 108-127, January.
    14. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2007. "Data Envelopment Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-45283-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Chia-Yen, 2016. "Most productive scale size versus demand fulfillment: A solution to the capacity dilemma," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 954-962.
    2. Hadjicostas, Petros & Soteriou, Andreas C., 2006. "One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 425-449, January.
    3. Mehdiloozad, Mahmood & Zhu, Joe & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Identification of congestion in data envelopment analysis under the occurrence of multiple projections: A reliable method capable of dealing with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 644-654.
    4. Sahoo, Biresh K & Khoveyni, Mohammad & Eslami, Robabeh & Chaudhury, Pradipta, 2016. "Returns to scale and most productive scale size in DEA with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 545-558.
    5. A. Davoodi & M. Zarepisheh & H. Rezai, 2015. "The nearest MPSS pattern in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 163-176, March.
    6. Banker, Rajiv D. & Cooper, William W. & Seiford, Lawrence M. & Thrall, Robert M. & Zhu, Joe, 2004. "Returns to scale in different DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 345-362, April.
    7. Zhu, Joe, 2001. "Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune's best cities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 263-284, December.
    8. Dellnitz, Andreas & Tavana, Madjid, 2024. "Data envelopment analysis: From non-monotonic to monotonic scale elasticities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 549-559.
    9. Hung, Shiu-Wan & Lu, Wen-Min & Wang, Tung-Pao, 2010. "Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 706-713, June.
    10. Hajar Haghighatpisheh & Sohrab Kordrostami & Alireza Amirteimoori & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, 2022. "Optimal scale sizes in input–output allocative data envelopment analysis models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1455-1476, August.
    11. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Zhu, Joe, 2000. "Further discussion on linear production functions and DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 611-618, December.
    13. Kaoru Tone, 2001. "On Returns to Scale under Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 31-47, July.
    14. Ole Bent Olesen & Niels Christian Petersen & Victor V. Podinovski, 2022. "Scale characteristics of variable returns-to-scale production technologies with ratio inputs and outputs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 383-423, November.
    15. Alonso, José M. & Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2015. "The impact of New Public Management on efficiency: An analysis of Madrid's hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 333-340.
    16. Wang, Ying-Ming & Lan, Yi-Xin, 2013. "Estimating most productive scale size with double frontiers data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 182-186.
    17. H Chang & C Galantine & A Thevaranjan, 2009. "Returns to scale pattern and efficient firm size in the public accounting industry: an empirical investigation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1495-1501, November.
    18. Saeed Assani & Jianlin Jiang & Ahmad Assani & Feng Yang, 2019. "Estimating and decomposing most productive scale size in parallel DEA networks with shared inputs: A case of China's Five-Year Plans," Papers 1910.03421, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    19. Holden, R. & Xu, B. & Greening, P. & Piecyk, M. & Dadhich, P., 2016. "Towards a common measure of greenhouse gas related logistics activity using data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 105-119.
    20. Kerstens, Kristiaan & Vanden Eeckaut, Philippe, 1999. "Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: A new method based on goodness-of-fit," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 206-214, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:45:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-022-00692-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.