IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v39y2017i2d10.1007_s00291-016-0466-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inventory control with and without deliveries in several pieces

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Larsen

    (Aarhus University)

Abstract

An inventory system is operated as a base stock system under a compound Poisson demand process. Besides having inventory and backorder costs, also a cost is incurred for each order that is delivered in several pieces to the customer (irrespective of whether some items in the order are delivered on time, or whether they are all delivered late but at different times). The possible split deliveries are assumed to happen automatically, meaning that there cannot at the same time be a positive on-hand inventory and a positive backlog. We develop a mathematical cost expression for this system to be optimized, denoted Model 1. We compare Model 1 to another model, denoted Model 2, where it is forbidden to make any of these split deliveries; thus at the same time, there can be a positive on-hand inventory and a positive backlog. We compare Model 2 to the standard textbook model, denoted Model 0, where split deliveries occur automatically and are costless. Thereby, we address a claim made by Zipkin (Foundations of inventory management. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000). We also examine the threshold value for the delivery split cost, which makes Model 1 and 2 perform equally well, and we examine how this threshold value depends on the other common parameters of the models.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Larsen, 2017. "Inventory control with and without deliveries in several pieces," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 607-622, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:39:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-016-0466-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-016-0466-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-016-0466-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-016-0466-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forsberg, Rolf, 1995. "Optimization of order-up-to-S policies for two-level inventory systems with compound Poisson demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 143-153, February.
    2. C Larsen & A Thorstenson, 2008. "A comparison between the order and the volume fill rate for a base-stock inventory control system under a compound renewal demand process," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(6), pages 798-804, June.
    3. Larsen, C. & Thorstenson, A., 2014. "The order and volume fill rates in inventory control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 13-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prak, Dennis & Rogetzer, Patricia, 2022. "Timing intermittent demand with time-varying order-up-to levels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1126-1136.
    2. Teunter, R.H. & Syntetos, A.A. & Babai, M.Z., 2017. "Stock keeping unit fill rate specification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 917-925.
    3. V. Radhamani & B. Sivakumar & G. Arivarignan, 2022. "A Comparative Study on Replenishment Policies for Perishable Inventory System with Service Facility and Multiple Server Vacation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 229-265, March.
    4. Dreyfuss, Michael & Giat, Yahel, 2017. "Optimal spares allocation to an exchangeable-item repair system with tolerable wait," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 584-594.
    5. Prak, Derk & Teunter, Rudolf & Babai, M. Z. & Syntetos, A. A. & Boylan, D, 2018. "Forecasting and Inventory Control with Compound Poisson Demand Using Periodic Demand Data," Research Report 2018010, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    6. Kouki, Chaaben & Babai, M. Zied & Jemai, Zied & Minner, Stefan, 2019. "Solution procedures for lost sales base-stock inventory systems with compound Poisson demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 172-182.
    7. Sofia Estelles-Miguel & Manuel Cardos & Jose Miguel Albarracin Guillem & Marta Palmer Gato, 2014. "Calculation of the Approaches to Cycle Service Level in Continuous Review Policy: A Tool for Corporate Entrepreneur," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 54-60, March.
    8. R.E. Lillo, 2001. "Optimal control of an M/G/1 queue with impatient priority customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 201-209, April.
    9. Andersson, Jonas & Malmberg, Filip & Marklund, Johan, 2023. "Exact analysis of One-Warehouse-Multiple-Retailer inventory systems with quantity restricted deliveries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1161-1172.
    10. Chong, You Quan & Wang, Bin & Yue Tan, Gladys Li & Cheong, Siew Ann, 2014. "Diversified firms on dynamical supply chain cope with financial crisis better," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 239-245.
    11. Howard, Christian & Marklund, Johan, 2011. "Evaluation of stock allocation policies in a divergent inventory system with shipment consolidation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 298-309, June.
    12. Johan Marklund, 2006. "Controlling Inventories in Divergent Supply Chains with Advance-Order Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 988-1010, October.
    13. Du, Bisheng & Larsen, Christian, 2011. "Base stock policies with degraded service to larger orders," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 326-333, September.
    14. Stefanny Ramirez & Laurence H. Brandenburg & Dario Bauso, 2023. "Coordinated Replenishment Game and Learning Under Time Dependency and Uncertainty of the Parameters," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 326-352, March.
    15. Disney, Stephen M. & Gaalman, Gerard J.C. & Hedenstierna, Carl Philip T. & Hosoda, Takamichi, 2015. "Fill rate in a periodic review order-up-to policy under auto-correlated normally distributed, possibly negative, demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 501-512.
    16. Nenes, George & Panagiotidou, Sofia & Tagaras, George, 2010. "Inventory management of multiple items with irregular demand: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 313-324, September.
    17. Haji, Rasoul & Neghab, Mohammadali Pirayesh & Baboli, Armand, 2009. "Introducing a new ordering policy in a two-echelon inventory system with Poisson demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 212-218, January.
    18. Larsen, C. & Thorstenson, A., 2014. "The order and volume fill rates in inventory control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 13-19.
    19. Lamghari-Idrissi, Douniel & Basten, Rob & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2020. "Spare parts inventory control under a fixed-term contract with a long-down constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 123-137.
    20. Babai, M.Z. & Jemai, Z. & Dallery, Y., 2011. "Analysis of order-up-to-level inventory systems with compound Poisson demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 552-558, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:39:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-016-0466-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.