IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v61y2024i3d10.1007_s12597-023-00734-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical fuzzy DEA model with double frontiers combined with TOPSIS technique: application on mobile money agents locations

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Muvingi

    (Harare Institute of Technology
    University of Technology, Mauritius)

  • Arshad Ahmud Iqbal Peer

    (University of Technology, Mauritius)

  • Josef Jablonský

    (Prague University of Economics and Business)

  • Hossein Azizi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi

    (Islamic Azad University)

Abstract

Hierarchical data envelopment analysis (DEA) models evaluate the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) with a hierarchical group structure, where sub-DMUs are grouped into main DMUs. Contrary to early hierarchical DEA models, which were based on crisp input and output data, the model adopted in this study considers fuzziness attributes in the input and output data. The efficiency analysis was mainly based on the optimistic frontier in the early conventional fuzzy DEA models. To get a full view of the efficiency of the DMUs, we incorporated a second frontier based on the pessimistic assumption. In this study, two levels of analysis were implemented for the sub-DMUs and main DMUs. A combination of the optimistic and pessimistic efficiency ratings for both levels of analysis was done to get the overall performance measures. We applied the proposed approach to analyse the mobile money agents’ locations. Aggregating sub-DMUs with ratings of the main DMUs improved the segregation of sub-DMUs in different groups. However, within groups, most sub-DMUs had similar ratings, making it difficult to distinguish the performance of the DMUs. To further improve the segregation of the DMUs, we applied the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) based on the overall performance measures. The performance of 75% of the sub-DMUs was completely segregated, whilst 100% was achieved for the main DMUs. The final TOPSIS results were validated using the principal component analysis (PCA). A Spearman correlation of 50% was observed between the TOPSIS and the PCA results. The accuracy of the district location TOPSIS rankings on the final suburb location TOPSIS rankings was 72%.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Muvingi & Arshad Ahmud Iqbal Peer & Josef Jablonský & Hossein Azizi & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, 2024. "Hierarchical fuzzy DEA model with double frontiers combined with TOPSIS technique: application on mobile money agents locations," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1154-1191, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:61:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-023-00734-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-023-00734-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-023-00734-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-023-00734-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Saber Saati & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi, 2018. "Efficiency analysis in two-stage structures using fuzzy data envelopment analysis," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(4), pages 909-932, December.
    2. Azadeh, Ali & Rahimi-Golkhandan, Armin & Moghaddam, Mohsen, 2014. "Location optimization of wind power generation–transmission systems under uncertainty using hierarchical fuzzy DEA: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 877-885.
    3. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: Two decades in the making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 457-472, November.
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Thanh Tam Le & Nguyen Dieu Linh Dang & Thi Dieu Thu Nguyen & Thanh Son Vu & Manh Dung Tran, 2019. "Determinants of Financial Inclusion: Comparative Study of Asian Countries," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(10), pages 1107-1123.
    6. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1962. "Programming with linear fractional functionals," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(3‐4), pages 181-186, September.
    7. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    8. Jacob Muvingi & Arshad Ahmud Iqbal Peer & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Volkan Soner Özsoy, 2022. "Hierarchical groups DEA cross-efficiency and TOPSIS technique: an application on mobile money agents locations," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(2), pages 171-199.
    9. Abubakar Adamu Magaji & Daneji Bashir Ahmad & Muhammed Ahmed Ibrahim & Chekene Imam-Ahmad Buba, 2020. "Driving faster financial inclusion in developing nations," Technology audit and production reserves, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 2(4(52)), pages 35-40.
    10. Thanh Tam Le & Nguyen Dieu Linh Dang & Thi Dieu Thu Nguyen & Thanh Son Vu & Manh Dung Tran, 2019. "Determinants of Financial Inclusion: Comparative Study of Asian Countries," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(10), pages 1107-1123, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Hui-hui & Yang, Guo-liang & Liu, Xiao-xiao & Song, Yao-yao, 2020. "R&D performance assessment of industrial enterprises in China: A two-stage DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Toloo, Mehdi & Mensah, Emmanuel Kwasi & Salahi, Maziar, 2022. "Robust optimization and its duality in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Jie Wu & Lulu Shen & Ganggang Zhang & Zhixiang Zhou & Qingyuan Zhu, 2024. "Efficiency evaluation with data uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1379-1403, August.
    4. Azarnoosh Kafi & Behrouz Daneshian & Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, 2021. "Forecasting the confidence interval of efficiency in fuzzy DEA," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 41-59.
    5. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Bao-Ngoc Tong & Cheng-Ping Cheng & Lien-Wen Liang & Yi-Jun Liu, 2023. "Using Network DEA to Explore the Effect of Mobile Payment on Taiwanese Bank Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Harald Dyckhoff & Katrin Allen, 1999. "Theoretische Begründung einer Effizienzanalyse mittels Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 411-436, May.
    8. Phung, Manh-Trung & Cheng, Cheng-Ping & Guo, Chuanyin & Kao, Chen-Yu, 2020. "Mixed Network DEA with Shared Resources: A Case of Measuring Performance for Banking Industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    9. Nakamoto, Yuya & Eguchi, Shogo & Takayabu, Hirotaka, 2024. "Efficiency and benchmarks for photovoltaic power generation amid uncertain conditions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Maciej Jewczak & Agata Zoltaczek, 2011. "Technical efficiency evaluation of health care entities in 1999-2009 - spatial and dynamic analysis - a case study of general care hospitals, with the use of DEA method (Ocena efektywnosci technicznej," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(33), pages 194-210.
    11. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2020. "A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Huang, Shwu-Huei & Yu, Ming-Miin & Huang, Ya-Ling, 2022. "Evaluation of the efficiency of the local tax administration in Taiwan: Application of a dynamic network data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    13. Loske, Dominic & Klumpp, Matthias, 2021. "Human-AI collaboration in route planning: An empirical efficiency-based analysis in retail logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    14. Ece Ucar & E. Ertugrul Karsak, 2024. "Evaluating Educational Performance of OECD Countries with Common-Weight DEA-Based Models," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13673-13700, September.
    15. Ming-Fu Hsu & Ying-Shao Hsin & Fu-Jiing Shiue, 2022. "Business analytics for corporate risk management and performance improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 629-669, August.
    16. Azadi, Majid & Yousefi, Saeed & Farzipoor Saen, Reza & Shabanpour, Hadi & Jabeen, Fauzia, 2023. "Forecasting sustainability of healthcare supply chains using deep learning and network data envelopment analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    19. Kao, Chiang, 2020. "Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 980-988.
    20. Shaher Z. Zahran & Jobair Bin Alam & Abdulrahem H. Al-Zahrani & Yiannis Smirlis & Stratos Papadimitriou & Vangelis Tsioumas, 2020. "Analysis of port efficiency using imprecise and incomplete data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 219-246, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hierarchical models; Data envelopment analysis; Double frontiers; TOPSIS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:61:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-023-00734-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.