IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v20y2020i3d10.1007_s12351-018-0375-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of k-out-of-n system under first and last replacement in reliability theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nizar Mannai

    (University of Carthage)

  • Soufiane Gasmi

    (University of Tunis)

Abstract

In various critical applications of many systems, economic use has been an essential architectural attribute for achieving high performance. A k-out-of-n system, which consists of n components and fails if at least $$n-k+1$$ n - k + 1 of the n components fail, is one of the most important systems in practice. Several researchers have shown that, there is an optimal design of such a system, so that the expected total cost of the system is minimized. The present paper aims to find the best compromise between age replacement and system configuration to design a k-out-of-n system when replacement first and last are applied i.e. the system undergoes preventive maintenances before failure at a planned time T or at a random working cycle Y whichever occurs first or last. Expected cost rates for the first and last replacement are formulated. Case studies are provided to illustrate the applications of the theoretical results developed and a numerical algorithm is made to obtain optimal k-out-of-n system configuration.

Suggested Citation

  • Nizar Mannai & Soufiane Gasmi, 2020. "Optimal design of k-out-of-n system under first and last replacement in reliability theory," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1353-1368, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:20:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-018-0375-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-018-0375-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-018-0375-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-018-0375-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yamamoto, Hisashi & Akiba, Tomoaki & Nagatsuka, Hideki & Moriyama, Yurie, 2008. "Recursive algorithm for the reliability of a connected-(1, 2)-or-(2, 1)-out-of-(m, n):F lattice system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(3), pages 854-864, August.
    2. Kim, Heungseob, 2017. "Optimal reliability design of a system with k-out-of-n subsystems considering redundancy strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 572-582.
    3. Xiang, Yanping & Levitin, Gregory, 2012. "Combined m-consecutive and k-out-of-n sliding window systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 105-113.
    4. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    5. Zhao, Xufeng & Qian, Cunhua & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2013. "Optimal policies for cumulative damage models with maintenance last and first," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 50-59.
    6. Wang, Yong & Li, Lin & Huang, Shuhong & Chang, Qing, 2012. "Reliability and covariance estimation of weighted k-out-of-n multi-state systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 138-147.
    7. Zhao, Xufeng & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2012. "Optimization problems of replacement first or last in reliability theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 141-149.
    8. Xie, Wei & Liao, Haitao & Jin, Tongdan, 2014. "Maximizing system availability through joint decision on component redundancy and spares inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 164-176.
    9. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2014. "Cold vs. hot standby mission operation cost minimization for 1-out-of-N systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 155-162.
    10. Toshio Nakagawa, 2005. "Maintenance Theory of Reliability," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-221-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junyuan Wang & Xufeng Zhao & Jiawei Xiang, 2024. "Optimum design and replacement policies for k-out-of-n systems with deviation time and cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 593-617, September.
    2. Chin-Chih Chang, 2023. "Optimal maintenance policy for a k-out-of-n system with replacement first and last," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 323(1), pages 31-43, April.
    3. Zhang, Qin & Fang, Zhigeng & Cai, Jiajia, 2021. "Preventive replacement policies with multiple missions and maintenance triggering approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Liu, Tzu-Hsin & Sheu, Wei-Teng & Zhang, Zhe-George & Ke, Jau-Chuan, 2021. "Optimal replacement policy with replacement last under cumulative damage models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernández, Arturo J., 2015. "Optimum attributes component test plans for k-out-of-n:F Weibull systems using prior information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 688-696.
    2. Xiaojun Liang & Yinghui Tang, 2019. "The improvement upon the reliability of the k-out-of-n:F system with the repair rates differentiation policy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 479-500, June.
    3. Hamidi, Maryam & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Szidarovszky, Miklos, 2016. "New one cycle criteria for optimizing preventive replacement policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 42-48.
    4. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Uan-Yu & Zhang, Zhe George, 2019. "Optimal replacement policies for a system based on a one-cycle criterion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Liu, Tzu-Hsin & Zhang, Zhe-George, 2019. "Extended optimal preventive replacement policies with random working cycle," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 398-415.
    6. Zhao, Xufeng & Liu, Hu-Chen & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2015. "Where does “whichever occurs first†hold for preventive maintenance modelings?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 203-211.
    7. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    8. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    9. Zheng, Junjun & Okamura, Hiroyuki & Dohi, Tadashi, 2021. "Age replacement with Markovian opportunity process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Doostparast, Mohammad & Kolahan, Farhad & Doostparast, Mahdi, 2014. "A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 98-106.
    11. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    12. Zhang, Qin & Fang, Zhigeng & Cai, Jiajia, 2021. "Preventive replacement policies with multiple missions and maintenance triggering approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Farhadi, Mohammad & Shahrokhi, Mahmoud & Rahmati, Seyed Habib A, 2022. "Developing a supplier selection model based on Markov chain and probability tree for a k-out-of-N system with different quality of spare parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    14. Ruiz-Castro, Juan Eloy & Dawabsha, Mohammed & Alonso, Francisco Javier, 2018. "Discrete-time Markovian arrival processes to model multi-state complex systems with loss of units and an indeterminate variable number of repairpersons," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 114-127.
    15. Endharta, Alfonsus Julanto & Yun, Won Young & Ko, Young Myoung, 2018. "Reliability evaluation of circular k-out-of-n: G balanced systems through minimal path sets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 226-236.
    16. Toledo, Maria Luíza Guerra de & Freitas, Marta A. & Colosimo, Enrico A. & Gilardoni, Gustavo L., 2015. "ARA and ARI imperfect repair models: Estimation, goodness-of-fit and reliability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 107-115.
    17. Shafiee, Mahmood & Chukova, Stefanka, 2013. "Maintenance models in warranty: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(3), pages 561-572.
    18. Zhao, Xufeng & Al-Khalifa, Khalifa N. & Magid Hamouda, Abdel & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2017. "Age replacement models: A summary with new perspectives and methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 95-105.
    19. Wu, Jing & Qian, Cunhua & Dohi, Tadashi, 2024. "Optimal opportunity-based age replacement policies in discrete time," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    20. Mingchih Chen & Xufeng Zhao & Toshio Nakagawa, 2019. "Replacement policies with general models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 277(1), pages 47-61, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:20:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s12351-018-0375-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.