IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v86y2017i1d10.1007_s11069-016-2672-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying risk to agriculture from volcanic ashfall: a case study from the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Anne Thompson

    (University of Auckland)

  • Jan M. Lindsay

    (University of Auckland)

  • Thomas M. Wilson

    (University of Canterbury)

  • Sebastien Biass

    (University of Geneva)

  • Laura Sandri

    (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV))

Abstract

Quantitatively assessing long-term volcanic risk can be challenging due to the many variables associated with volcanic hazard and vulnerability. This study presents a structured first-order approach for considering variables in hazard and vulnerability analyses, such as eruption style and cyclic fragility, in order to quantitatively estimate risk. Probabilistic volcanic hazard data derived from advection–diffusion–sedimentation tephra fall model TEPHRA2 and probabilistic volcanic hazard analysis tool BET_VH (Bayesian Event Tree for Volcanic Hazards) are combined with fragility functions and seasonal vulnerability coefficients for agricultural production to calculate volcanic risk indices which represent the likelihood of damage or loss to farm production over a given time frame. The resulting dataset allows for approximations of quantitative risk over a continuous range of ash thickness thresholds, at multiple levels of uncertainty, and in the context of fluctuating hazard and vulnerability environments (e.g., seasonal wind patterns and crop phases). We illustrate this approach through a case study which evaluates the risk of incurring 90% damage to agricultural production at dairy and fruit farms in the Bay of Plenty region of New Zealand (BoP) due to ashfall from a Plinian eruption phase at the large local caldera volcano, the Okataina Volcanic Centre (OVC). Consideration of seasonal wind profiles, seasonal fluctuations in fruit and dairy farm vulnerability, multiple possible OVC eruption styles, different possible OVC vent locations, and a continuous distribution of ash thickness and damage thresholds enables a multi-dimensional analysis that aims to reflect the natural complexity and interdependencies associated with volcanic risk. A risk uncertainty matrix is introduced as a conceptual scheme to help guide evaluation and communication of the results of such quantitative risk analyses by showing how different types of uncertainty can yield “maximum”, “average”, or “minimum” estimates of risk. Results of this case study indicate that BoP fruit farms are at higher risk of experiencing damage and production loss from OVC ashfall than dairy farms, and farms to the east of the OVC are typically at higher risk than farms to the north of the OVC. Forecasts based on the annual maximum estimate of risk for fruit farms show a regional average of 2.3% probability (greater than 1 in 50 likelihood) of experiencing 90% damage from a basaltic or rhyolitic Plinian eruption from anywhere within the OVC over a period of 100 years. Seasonal-level analyses revealed that the risk of experiencing losses due to OVC ashfall at fruit farms is cyclic and fluctuates with time of year and harvest season, with the highest risk experienced during peak harvest season (15 October–14 April) when crop vulnerability is high and westerly winds dominate in the BoP.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Anne Thompson & Jan M. Lindsay & Thomas M. Wilson & Sebastien Biass & Laura Sandri, 2017. "Quantifying risk to agriculture from volcanic ashfall: a case study from the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 31-56, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:86:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2672-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2672-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2672-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-016-2672-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather Craig & Thomas Wilson & Carol Stewart & Gustavo Villarosa & Valeria Outes & Shane Cronin & Susanna Jenkins, 2016. "Agricultural impact assessment and management after three widespread tephra falls in Patagonia, South America," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 1167-1229, June.
    2. Thomas Wilson & James Cole, 2007. "Potential impact of ash eruptions on dairy farms from a study of the effects on a farm in eastern Bay of Plenty, New Zealand; implications for hazard mitigation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 43(1), pages 103-128, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Camilo Gomez-Zapata & Cristhian Parrado & Theresa Frimberger & Fernando Barragán-Ochoa & Fabio Brill & Kerstin Büche & Michael Krautblatter & Michael Langbein & Massimiliano Pittore & Hugo Rosero, 2021. "Community Perception and Communication of Volcanic Risk from the Cotopaxi Volcano in Latacunga, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heather Craig & Thomas Wilson & Carol Stewart & Gustavo Villarosa & Valeria Outes & Shane Cronin & Susanna Jenkins, 2016. "Agricultural impact assessment and management after three widespread tephra falls in Patagonia, South America," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(2), pages 1167-1229, June.
    2. Sólveig Thorvaldsdóttir & Ragnar Sigbjörnsson, 2015. "Framing the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption from a farming-disaster perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 77(3), pages 1619-1653, July.
    3. Juan Camilo Gomez-Zapata & Cristhian Parrado & Theresa Frimberger & Fernando Barragán-Ochoa & Fabio Brill & Kerstin Büche & Michael Krautblatter & Michael Langbein & Massimiliano Pittore & Hugo Rosero, 2021. "Community Perception and Communication of Volcanic Risk from the Cotopaxi Volcano in Latacunga, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Hanna Huitu & Kim Kaustell & Matti Pastell, 2020. "The effect of storms on Finnish dairy farms: electrical outage statistics and the effect on milk production," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(2), pages 1695-1704, November.
    5. Thomas Wilson & Jim Cole & Shane Cronin & Carol Stewart & David Johnston, 2011. "Impacts on agriculture following the 1991 eruption of Vulcan Hudson, Patagonia: lessons for recovery," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 57(2), pages 185-212, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk; Ashfall; Tephra; Hazard; Vulnerability; BET_VH; TEPHRA2;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:86:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2672-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.