IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v75y2015i2p1075-1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfall events in Jakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Jiandong Liu
  • Chi Doan
  • Shie-Yui Liong
  • Richard Sanders
  • Anh Dao
  • Timothy Fewtrell

Abstract

Jakarta is vulnerable to flooding and extreme rainfall events are always the main cause of the occurrence of heavy flood events with loss of life and property. The flood in February 2007 is one of the most devastating events with the total rainfall during the 2-week period amounted to almost one-fourth of the total rainfall in 2007 at some stations. The huge scale of the loss due to this event as well as a series of big consecutive events the following years draw the attention to understand the flood risk in detail for Jakarta region. The study aimed to (1) estimate the return period for the February 2007 event in Jakarta, (2) develop intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves as well as the corresponding confidence intervals for Jakarta region up to 7-day duration and (3) understand the uncertainty of developed IDF curves induced with at-site and regional approaches. Daily rainfall data from 11 stations within Jakarta region with record lengths ranging from 15 to 22 years were collected. As the reliability of the frequency analysis is influenced by record length available, the frequencies and magnitudes of extreme rainfall events in the Jakarta region were analyzed by regional frequency analysis (RFA) based on the method of L-moments. One station (Darmaga) was removed from 11 stations after the data quality and homogenization check. The annual maximum rainfall series of duration of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 day at the 10 stations in Jakarta were then aggregated for the investigation. Because the value of discordancy measure exceeded the critical value, station Tangerang was subsequently removed from the group. Annual maximum series at these 9 stations were finally combined as the study region and passed the discordancy measure and heterogeneity measures of RFA. The accuracy of at-site rainfall quantile estimates by at-site and RFA was assessed and compared by error bounds at the confidence level of 90 %, based on Monte Carlo simulations by fitting generalized extreme value probability distributions to the regional average sample L-moment ratios. The results showed that the return period of the February 2007 extreme event in Jakarta is over 300 year for 3-day duration at Halim station; close to 200 and 150-year return periods for 7-day duration at Halim and Pdk Betung stations, respectively. For the first time, the Jakarta regional multi-day IDF curves together with the corresponding 90 % confidence intervals for 2, 5, 10, 30, 50, 100, 200, and 300 year were developed. For effective flood risk mapping/mitigation in Jakarta, duration of longer than 1-day design storm should be considered. Also frequent re-visit of the IDF curves is indeed important if severe storms occurred after the IDF curves are established. Finally, the study suggested that more stations/data should be acquired for the region so that the estimation is more robust and reliable. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Jiandong Liu & Chi Doan & Shie-Yui Liong & Richard Sanders & Anh Dao & Timothy Fewtrell, 2015. "Regional frequency analysis of extreme rainfall events in Jakarta," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(2), pages 1075-1104, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:2:p:1075-1104
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-014-1363-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-014-1363-5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-014-1363-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Ahani & S. Saeid Mousavi Nadoushani & Ali Moridi, 2020. "Regionalization of watersheds based on the concept of rough set," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 883-899, October.
    2. Evan Hajani & Ataur Rahman, 2018. "Design rainfall estimation: comparison between GEV and LP3 distributions and at-site and regional estimates," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(1), pages 67-88, August.
    3. M. T. Medina-Cobo & A. P. García-Marín & J. Estévez & F. J. Jiménez-Hornero & J. L. Ayuso-Muñoz, 2017. "Obtaining Homogeneous Regions by Determining the Generalized Fractal Dimensions of Validated Daily Rainfall Data Sets," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(7), pages 2333-2348, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:2:p:1075-1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.