IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v75y2015i1p33-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A novel assessment of the role of Danube floodplains in flood hazard reduction (FEM method)

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Schober
  • Christoph Hauer
  • Helmut Habersack

Abstract

During the last decades, river floods accounted for enormous damages especially in highly developed and/or densely populated regions worldwide. Moreover, due to anthropogenic alterations of hydrology and river morphology (climate change, land use changes in the catchment, channelling and constricting rivers) and due to the ongoing accumulation of values (such as settlements, infrastructure facilities, etc.) in flood prone areas, this amount of damages is likely to rise in future. Integrated flood risk management is legally in force and aims at reducing the negative effects of floods by combining structural and non-structural flood protection measures. Non-structural measures such as the preservation or restoration of floodplains are considered by the EU Floods Directive as an effective tool for reducing flood risks. For most of the rivers, however, very little is known about the effectiveness of floodplains in regard to hydrological and hydraulical flood hazard reduction. This lack in knowledge often obstructs the integration of these natural flood retention processes into the concepts of integrated flood risk management. In the present study, the Austrian Danube was investigated along its entire 350 km length, determining reaches and floodplains with high relevance for flood water retention and thus for reducing flood hazards downstream. A novel analysis based on one-dimensional and two-dimensional hydrodynamic-numerical modelling, using hydrological and hydraulic parameters defined under the so-called floodplain evaluation matrix method (FEM; Habersack et al. in Nat Hazards, in print, 2013 ), was carried out to evaluate retention effectiveness on various spatial scales. The results illustrate the magnitude and the variability of flood retention and hydraulic parameters with respect to different hydrological settings (flood wave shape, recurrence probability). Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Schober & Christoph Hauer & Helmut Habersack, 2015. "A novel assessment of the role of Danube floodplains in flood hazard reduction (FEM method)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 33-50, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:1:p:33-50
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0880-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11069-013-0880-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-013-0880-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Luc Kok & Malte Grossmann, 2010. "Large-scale assessment of flood risk and the effects of mitigation measures along the Elbe River," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 52(1), pages 143-166, January.
    2. José Barredo, 2007. "Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 42(1), pages 125-148, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcelle Nardelli Baptista & Ricardo Valcarcel & Felipe Araujo Mateus & William Soares Medeiros & Fernando Canto Andrade, 2017. "Impact of Urbanization on the Hydrodynamics of a Water Table in a Floodplain with High Potential for Renaturation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(13), pages 4091-4102, October.
    2. Gašper Rak & Daniel Kozelj & Franci Steinman, 2016. "The impact of floodplain land use on flood wave propagation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 425-443, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helmut Habersack & Bernhard Schober & Christoph Hauer, 2015. "Floodplain evaluation matrix (FEM): An interdisciplinary method for evaluating river floodplains in the context of integrated flood risk management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 5-32, February.
    2. Jan Philipp Schägner & Luke Brander & Joachim Maes & Volkmar Hartje, 2012. "Mapping Ecosystem Services’ Values: Current Practice and Future Prospects," Working Papers 2012.59, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    3. Hong Wang & Xiaodong Zhang, 2018. "A Decentralized Bi-Level Fuzzy Two-Stage Decision Model for Flood Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1615-1629, March.
    4. Natho, Stephanie & Hudson, Paul, 2024. "Accounting for the value of ecosystem services of floodplains in Germany – National studies matter," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Schägner, Jan Philipp & Brander, Luke & Maes, Joachim & Hartje, Volkmar, 2013. "Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 33-46.
    6. Balqis M. Rehan, 2018. "An innovative micro-scale approach for vulnerability and flood risk assessment with the application to property-level protection adoptions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1039-1057, April.
    7. D. Skublics & P. Rutschmann, 2015. "Progress in natural flood retention at the Bavarian Danube," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 51-67, February.
    8. Gábor Ungvári, 2022. "Combining Flood Risk Mitigation and Carbon Sequestration to Optimize Sustainable Land Management Schemes: Experiences from the Middle-Section of Hungary’s Tisza River," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Jie Yin & Dapeng Yu & Zhane Yin & Jun Wang & Shiyuan Xu, 2013. "Multiple scenario analyses of Huangpu River flooding using a 1D/2D coupled flood inundation model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 66(2), pages 577-589, March.
    10. H. Moel & B. Jongman & H. Kreibich & B. Merz & E. Penning-Rowsell & P. Ward, 2015. "Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 865-890, August.
    11. Helmut Habersack & Daniel Haspel & Bernhard Schober, 2015. "Flood prevention and mitigation at large rivers," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 1-3, February.
    12. Hauer, C. & Wagner, B. & Aigner, J. & Holzapfel, P. & Flödl, P. & Liedermann, M. & Tritthart, M. & Sindelar, C. & Pulg, U. & Klösch, M. & Haimann, M. & Donnum, B.O. & Stickler, M. & Habersack, H., 2018. "State of the art, shortcomings and future challenges for a sustainable sediment management in hydropower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 40-55.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:75:y:2015:i:1:p:33-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.