IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i13d10.1007_s11069-024-06634-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing flood wave modelling of reservoir failure: a comparative study of structure-from-motion based 2D and 3D methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • Jong-hyuk Lee

    (Seoul National University)

  • Sang-ik Lee

    (Kyungpook National University)

  • Youngjoon Jeong

    (Seoul National University)

  • Byung-hun Seo

    (Seoul National University)

  • Dong-su Kim

    (Seoul National University)

  • Ye-jin Seo

    (Seoul National University)

  • Younggu Her

    (University of Florida)

  • Won Choi

    (Seoul National University)

Abstract

Predicting flood wave propagation from reservoir failures is critical to practical flood hazard assessment and risk management. Flood waves are sensitive to topography, channel geometry, structures, and natural features along floodplain paths. Thus, the accuracy of flood wave modelling depends on how precisely those features are represented. This study introduces an enhancing approach to flood wave modelling by accurately representing three-dimensional objects in floodplains using the structure-from-motion (SfM). This method uses an unmanned aerial vehicle to capture topographic complexities and account for ground objects that impact flood propagation. Using the three-dimensional volume of fluid numerical approach significantly improves an enhanced representation of turbulent flow dynamics and computational efficiency, especially in handling large topography datasets. Reproductions from this enhanced three-dimensional approach were validated against recent reservoir failure observations and contrasted with traditional two-dimensional models. The results revealed that the suggested three-dimensional methodology achieved a significant 84.4% reproducibility when juxtaposed with actual inundation traces. It was 35.5%p more accurate than the two-dimensional diffusion wave equation (DWE) and 17.1%p more than the shallow water equation (SWE) methods in predicting flood waves. This suggests that the reproducibility of the DWE and SWE decreases compared to the three-dimensional approach when considering more complex floodplains. These results demonstrate that three-dimensional flood wave analysis with the SfM methodology is optimal for effectively minimising topographic and flood wave reproduction errors across extensive areas. This dual reduction in errors significantly enhances the reliability of flood hazard assessments and improves risk management by providing more precise and realistic predictions of flood waves.

Suggested Citation

  • Jong-hyuk Lee & Sang-ik Lee & Youngjoon Jeong & Byung-hun Seo & Dong-su Kim & Ye-jin Seo & Younggu Her & Won Choi, 2024. "Enhancing flood wave modelling of reservoir failure: a comparative study of structure-from-motion based 2D and 3D methodologies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 11611-11640, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06634-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06634-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06634-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06634-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Damme, 2020. "An analytical process-based approach to predicting breach width in levees constructed from dilatant soils," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(1), pages 59-85, March.
    2. Ahmed Mohammed Sami Al-Janabi & Abdul Halim Ghazali & Yousry Mahmoud Ghazaw & Haitham Abdulmohsin Afan & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Zaher Mundher Yaseen, 2020. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis for Earth-Fill Dam Seepage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. G. Papaioannou & A. Loukas & L. Vasiliades & G. T. Aronica, 2016. "Flood inundation mapping sensitivity to riverine spatial resolution and modelling approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(1), pages 117-132, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. P. V. Timbadiya & K. M. Krishnamraju, 2023. "A 2D hydrodynamic model for river flood prediction in a coastal floodplain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1143-1165, January.
    2. Tewodros Assefa Nigussie & Abdusselam Altunkaynak, 2019. "Modeling the effect of urbanization on flood risk in Ayamama Watershed, Istanbul, Turkey, using the MIKE 21 FM model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(2), pages 1031-1047, November.
    3. Peyman Yariyan & Saeid Janizadeh & Tran Phong & Huu Duy Nguyen & Romulus Costache & Hiep Le & Binh Thai Pham & Biswajeet Pradhan & John P. Tiefenbacher, 2020. "Improvement of Best First Decision Trees Using Bagging and Dagging Ensembles for Flood Probability Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 3037-3053, July.
    4. Chengwei Lu & Jianzhong Zhou & Zhongzheng He & Shuai Yuan, 2018. "Evaluating typical flood risks in Yangtze River Economic Belt: application of a flood risk mapping framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1187-1210, December.
    5. Muhammad Farooq & Muhammad Shafique & Muhammad Shahzad Khattak, 2019. "Flood hazard assessment and mapping of River Swat using HEC-RAS 2D model and high-resolution 12-m TanDEM-X DEM (WorldDEM)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(2), pages 477-492, June.
    6. Yan Chen & Hao Hou & Yao Li & Luoyang Wang & Jinjin Fan & Ben Wang & Tangao Hu, 2022. "Urban Inundation under Different Rainstorm Scenarios in Lin’an City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Vineela Nandam & P. L. Patel, 2024. "On the role of digital terrain topography and land use dynamics in flood hazard assessment of urban floodplain," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(13), pages 11877-11902, October.
    8. Emrah Yalcin, 2020. "Assessing the impact of topography and land cover data resolutions on two-dimensional HEC-RAS hydrodynamic model simulations for urban flood hazard analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(3), pages 995-1017, April.
    9. H. Zaifoglu & A. M. Yanmaz & B. Akintug, 2019. "Developing flood mitigation measures for the northern part of Nicosia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 98(2), pages 535-557, September.
    10. Nikunj K. Mangukiya & Ashutosh Sharma, 2022. "Flood risk mapping for the lower Narmada basin in India: a machine learning and IoT-based framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1285-1304, September.
    11. Neslihan Beden & Asli Ulke Keskin, 2021. "Flood map production and evaluation of flood risks in situations of insufficient flow data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(3), pages 2381-2408, February.
    12. Mayara Maria Arruda Gomes & Lívia Fragoso Melo Verçosa & José Almir Cirilo, 2021. "Hydrologic models coupled with 2D hydrodynamic model for high-resolution urban flood simulation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3121-3157, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:13:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06634-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.