IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v112y2022i1d10.1007_s11069-021-05189-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood disaster risk assessment of and countermeasures toward Yangtze River Delta by considering index interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiling Sun

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
    Nanjing Research Institute of Ecological and Environmental Protection)

  • Zaiwu Gong

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Weiwei Guo

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Ashfaq Ahmad Shah

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Jie Wu

    (Jiangsu Institute of Quality and Standardization
    Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics)

  • Haiying Xu

    (Nanjing Research Institute of Ecological and Environmental Protection)

Abstract

An effective risk assessment and response to flood disasters will help ensure the sustainable development of a region. A perfect flood disaster assessment index system should consider the interactions between indexes. The Choquet integral method can effectively solve the problems of index interactions and information overlap and can be used to aggregate relevant decision criteria and express the preferences of decision makers, making it a useful supplement to traditional indicator integration methods. A flood disaster risk assessment model based on the Choquet integral was constructed by considering the meteorological factors, geographical conditions, economic development, population status, medical conditions, education level, and crop sowing in the Yangtze River Delta region (including Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui) from 2006 to 2017. The model quantified the interaction between the evaluation indexes, taking the minimum information redundancy as the goal; subsequently, a flood disaster risk assessment was performed. The results showed that the meteorological conditions, geographical factors, exposure, and vulnerability have negative interactions with emergency and recovery capabilities. Because of the influence of the first three criteria, the information contained in the criteria for emergency and recovery capabilities is weakened or underestimated. Anhui Province was the largest flood disaster risk area in the Yangtze River Delta region from 2006 to 2017. Zhejiang Province ranked second, and Jiangsu Province and Shanghai City ranked third and fourth, respectively. The assessment results can provide a useful reference for flood disaster risk management in the Yangtze River Delta region.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiling Sun & Zaiwu Gong & Weiwei Guo & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Jie Wu & Haiying Xu, 2022. "Flood disaster risk assessment of and countermeasures toward Yangtze River Delta by considering index interaction," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 112(1), pages 475-500, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:112:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-05189-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-05189-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-05189-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-05189-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marichal, Jean-Luc & Roubens, Marc, 2000. "Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 641-650, August.
    2. Enliang Guo & Jiquan Zhang & Xuehui Ren & Qi Zhang & Zhongyi Sun, 2014. "Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in central Liaoning Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 947-965, November.
    3. Grabisch, Michel & Kojadinovic, Ivan & Meyer, Patrick, 2008. "A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 766-785, April.
    4. Stanislaw Heilpern, 2002. "Using Choquet integral in economics," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 53-73, January.
    5. Chengwei Lu & Jianzhong Zhou & Zhongzheng He & Shuai Yuan, 2018. "Evaluating typical flood risks in Yangtze River Economic Belt: application of a flood risk mapping framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(3), pages 1187-1210, December.
    6. Li, Gang & Law, Rob & Vu, Huy Quan & Rong, Jia, 2013. "Discovering the hotel selection preferences of Hong Kong inbound travelers using the Choquet Integral," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 321-330.
    7. Yi Ge & Wei Xu & Zhi-Hui Gu & Yu-Chao Zhang & Lei Chen, 2011. "Risk perception and hazard mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta region, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 56(3), pages 633-648, March.
    8. Rio Yonson & Ilan Noy & JC Gaillard, 2018. "The measurement of disaster risk: An example from tropical cyclones in the Philippines," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 736-765, May.
    9. Milad Moradi & Mahmoud Reza Delavar & Behzad Moshiri, 2017. "A GIS-based multi-criteria analysis model for earthquake vulnerability assessment using Choquet integral and game theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1377-1398, July.
    10. J. Birkmann & O. Cardona & M. Carreño & A. Barbat & M. Pelling & S. Schneiderbauer & S. Kienberger & M. Keiler & D. Alexander & P. Zeil & T. Welle, 2013. "Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 193-211, June.
    11. Jidong Wu & Ying Li & Ning Li & Peijun Shi, 2018. "Development of an Asset Value Map for Disaster Risk Assessment in China by Spatial Disaggregation Using Ancillary Remote Sensing Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 17-30, January.
    12. Guillermo Owen, 1972. "Multilinear Extensions of Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5-Part-2), pages 64-79, January.
    13. Alexa Tanner & Joseph Árvai, 2018. "Perceptions of Risk and Vulnerability Following Exposure to a Major Natural Disaster: The Calgary Flood of 2013," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 548-561, March.
    14. Lianfa Li & Jinfeng Wang & Hareton Leung & Chengsheng Jiang, 2010. "Assessment of Catastrophic Risk Using Bayesian Network Constructed from Domain Knowledge and Spatial Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(7), pages 1157-1175, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuming Wang & Xianrui Yu & Xiaobing Yu, 2022. "Flood Disaster Risk Assessment Based on DEA Model in Southeast Asia along “The Belt and Road”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Wahid Ullah & Nasir Abbas Khan & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Chong Xu, 2024. "Mapping Rural Household Vulnerability to Flood-Induced Health Risks in Disaster-Stricken Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruiling Sun & Ge Gao & Zaiwu Gong & Jie Wu, 2020. "A review of risk analysis methods for natural disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 100(2), pages 571-593, January.
    2. Pelegrina, Guilherme Dean & Duarte, Leonardo Tomazeli & Grabisch, Michel & Romano, João Marcos Travassos, 2020. "The multilinear model in multicriteria decision making: The case of 2-additive capacities and contributions to parameter identification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 945-956.
    3. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Bilbao-Terol, Celia, 2024. "The Choquet integral supported by a hedonic approach for modelling preferences in hotel selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    4. Fujimoto, Katsushige & Kojadinovic, Ivan & Marichal, Jean-Luc, 2006. "Axiomatic characterizations of probabilistic and cardinal-probabilistic interaction indices," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 72-99, April.
    5. Lorenza Campagnolo & Carlo Carraro & Fabio Eboli & Luca Farnia, 2015. "Assessing SDGs: A New Methodology to Measure Sustainability," Working Papers 2015.89, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    7. Mayag, Brice & Bouyssou, Denis, 2020. "Necessary and possible interaction between criteria in a 2-additive Choquet integral model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 308-320.
    8. Ferreira, João J.M. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F., 2018. "Enhancing the decision-making virtuous cycle of ethical banking practices using the Choquet integral," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 492-497.
    9. Angilella, Silvia & Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto, 2010. "Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 277-288, February.
    10. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2019. "An Analysis of Winsorized Weighted Means," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 907-933, October.
    11. Mikhail Timonin, 2012. "Maximization of the Choquet integral over a convex set and its application to resource allocation problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 543-579, July.
    12. Kojadinovic, Ivan, 2004. "Estimation of the weights of interacting criteria from the set of profiles by means of information-theoretic functionals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 741-751, June.
    13. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2016. "Combining analytical hierarchy process and Choquet integral within non-additive robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 2-18.
    14. Siskos, Eleftherios & Burgherr, Peter, 2022. "Multicriteria decision support for the evaluation of electricity supply resilience: Exploration of interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 611-626.
    15. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Luping & Zhou, Peng & Zhou, Dequn, 2015. "A non-additive multiple criteria analysis method for evaluation of airline service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 154-161.
    16. Mikhail Timonin, 2016. "Choquet integral in decision analysis - lessons from the axiomatization," Papers 1611.09926, arXiv.org.
    17. Michel Grabisch & Christophe Labreuche, 2010. "A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 247-286, March.
    18. Silvia Angilella & Marta Bottero & Salvatore Corrente & Valentina Ferretti & Salvatore Greco & Isabella M. Lami, 2016. "Non Additive Robust Ordinal Regression for urban and territorial planning: an application for siting an urban waste landfill," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 427-456, October.
    19. Mehmet Pinar, 2022. "Choquet-Integral Aggregation Method to Aggregate Social Indicators to Account for Interactions: An Application to the Human Development Index," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 1-53, January.
    20. Campagnolo, Lorenza & Eboli, Fabio & Farnia, Luca & Carraro, Carlo, 2018. "Supporting the UN SDGs transition: Methodology for sustainability assessment and current worldwide ranking," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:112:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-021-05189-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.