IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v107y2021i2d10.1007_s11069-021-04634-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Downscaling of real-time coastal flooding predictions for decision support

Author

Listed:
  • C. A. Rucker

    (North Carolina State University
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)

  • N. Tull

    (North Carolina State University
    University of Texas at Austin)

  • J. C. Dietrich

    (North Carolina State University)

  • T. E. Langan

    (North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program, NC Emergency Management)

  • H. Mitasova

    (North Carolina State University)

  • B. O. Blanton

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

  • J. G. Fleming

    (Seahorse Coastal Consulting)

  • R. A. Luettich

    (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)

Abstract

During coastal storms, forecasters and researchers use numerical models to predict the magnitude and extent of coastal flooding. These models must represent the large regions that may be affected by a storm, and thus, they can be computationally costly and may not use the highest geospatial resolution. However, predicted flood extents can be downscaled (by increasing resolution) as a post-processing step. Existing downscaling methods use either a static extrapolation of the flooding as a flat surface, or rely on subsequent simulations with nested, full-physics models at higher resolution. This research explores a middle way, in which the downscaling includes simplified physics to improve accuracy. Using results from a state-of-the-art model, we downscale its flood predictions with three methods: (1) static, in which the water surface elevations are extrapolated horizontally until they intersect the ground surface; (2) slopes, in which the gradient of the water surface is used; and (3) head loss, which accounts for energy losses due to land cover characteristics. The downscaling methods are then evaluated for forecasts and hindcasts of Hurricane Florence (2018), which caused widespread flooding in North Carolina. The static and slopes methods tend to over-estimate the flood extents. However, the head loss method generates a downscaled flooding extent that is a close match to the predictions from a higher-resolution, full-physics model. These results are encouraging for the use of these downscaling methods to support decision-making during coastal storms.

Suggested Citation

  • C. A. Rucker & N. Tull & J. C. Dietrich & T. E. Langan & H. Mitasova & B. O. Blanton & J. G. Fleming & R. A. Luettich, 2021. "Downscaling of real-time coastal flooding predictions for decision support," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(2), pages 1341-1369, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:107:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04634-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04634-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04634-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-04634-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorge A. Ramirez & Michal Lichter & Tom J. Coulthard & Chris Skinner, 2016. "Hyper-resolution mapping of regional storm surge and tide flooding: comparison of static and dynamic models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 571-590, May.
    2. Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts & Ning Lin & Wouter Botzen & Kerry Emanuel & Hans de Moel, 2013. "Low‐Probability Flood Risk Modeling for New York City," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(5), pages 772-788, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johnathan Woodruff & J. C. Dietrich & D. Wirasaet & A. B. Kennedy & D. Bolster, 2023. "Storm surge predictions from ocean to subgrid scales," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2989-3019, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. J. Rasmussen & Scott Kulp & Robert E. Kopp & Michael Oppenheimer & Benjamin H. Strauss, 2022. "Popular extreme sea level metrics can better communicate impacts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Yi‐Ping Fang & Giovanni Sansavini & Enrico Zio, 2019. "An Optimization‐Based Framework for the Identification of Vulnerabilities in Electric Power Grids Exposed to Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1949-1969, September.
    3. Alaa Ahmed & Guna Hewa & Abdullah Alrajhi, 2021. "Flood susceptibility mapping using a geomorphometric approach in South Australian basins," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 629-653, March.
    4. Edward Helderop & Tony H. Grubesic, 2022. "Hurricane storm surge: toward a normalized damage index for coastal regions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1179-1197, January.
    5. Y. Androulidakis & C. Makris & Z. Mallios & I. Pytharoulis & V. Baltikas & Y. Krestenitis, 2023. "Storm surges and coastal inundation during extreme events in the Mediterranean Sea: the IANOS Medicane," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 939-978, May.
    6. Xinmeng Shan & Jiahong Wen & Min Zhang & Luyang Wang & Qian Ke & Weijiang Li & Shiqiang Du & Yong Shi & Kun Chen & Banggu Liao & Xiande Li & Hui Xu, 2019. "Scenario-Based Extreme Flood Risk of Residential Buildings and Household Properties in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Łukasz Kuźmiński & Michał Nadolny & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2020. "Probabilistic Quantification in the Analysis of Flood Risks in Cross-Border Areas of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Anna Timonina & Stefan Hochrainer‐Stigler & Georg Pflug & Brenden Jongman & Rodrigo Rojas, 2015. "Structured Coupling of Probability Loss Distributions: Assessing Joint Flood Risk in Multiple River Basins," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(11), pages 2102-2119, November.
    9. Arnaud Mignan, 2022. "Categorizing and Harmonizing Natural, Technological, and Socio-Economic Perils Following the Catastrophe Modeling Paradigm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-32, October.
    10. Meri Davlasheridze & Qin Fan & Wesley Highfield & Jiaochen Liang, 2021. "Economic impacts of storm surge events: examining state and national ripple effects," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Bouchra Zellou & Hassane Rahali, 2017. "Assessment of reduced-complexity landscape evolution model suitability to adequately simulate flood events in complex flow conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 1-29, March.
    12. Solecki William & Leichenko Robin & Eisenhauer David, 2017. "Extreme Climate Events, Household Decision-Making and Transitions in the Immediate Aftermath of Hurricane Sandy," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Sciendo, vol. 21(4), pages 139-150, December.
    13. Hai Sun & Jin Wang & Wentao Ye, 2021. "A Data Augmentation-Based Evaluation System for Regional Direct Economic Losses of Storm Surge Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    15. Arnaud Mignan, 2022. "A Digital Template for the Generic Multi-Risk (GenMR) Framework: A Virtual Natural Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Toon Haer & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Hans de Moel & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, 2017. "Integrating Household Risk Mitigation Behavior in Flood Risk Analysis: An Agent‐Based Model Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(10), pages 1977-1992, October.
    17. Daniel Caparros‐Midwood & Stuart Barr & Richard Dawson, 2017. "Spatial Optimization of Future Urban Development with Regards to Climate Risk and Sustainability Objectives," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(11), pages 2164-2181, November.
    18. W. J. Wouter Botzen & Howard Kunreuther & Erwann Michel-Kerjan, 2019. "Protecting against disaster risks: Why insurance and prevention may be complements," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 151-169, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:107:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04634-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.