IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v104y2020i1d10.1007_s11069-020-04143-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy risk analysis of dam overtopping from snowmelt floods in the nonstationarity case of the Manas River catchment, China

Author

Listed:
  • Kuan Yang

    (Shihezi University)

  • Fulong Chen

    (Shihezi University)

  • Chaofei He

    (Shihezi University)

  • Zhijun Zhang

    (Shihezi University)

  • Aihua Long

    (Shihezi University
    China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research)

Abstract

With the significant climate change that has occurred in the Manas River catchment, the temporal and spatial patterns of the natural changes in the regional water cycle have changed dramatically in the past 30 years, and the frequency of extreme hydrological events has increased, which has changed the overall stability of the hydrological system of the catchment. According to the annual maximum peak flow data for the period 1956–2014 in the Manas River catchment, we used variable fuzzy set theory and the Mann–Kendall test to conduct trend and change point tests, respectively, and decomposition synthesis theory was used to handle consistency correction. Combined with the flood routing results for the Kensiwate reservoir using Monte Carlo simulation, a reservoir overtopping risk model based on right-angle trapezoidal fuzzy numbers was established, and the fuzzy risk index intervals and the corresponding fuzzy risk rate intervals for the Kensiwate reservoir were considered for past and present conditions. The results show that the local tendency and jumping of the maximum flood peak series showed significant changes; the annual runoff had an obvious growth trend in the period 1985–2006 and a gradually varying qualitative change from 1975 to 2000. In particular, the characteristic parameter reached an extreme qualitative change level of − 0.0016 in 1993. Then, we used decomposition synthesis theory to process the sequence with jumping points and obtained the past and present hydrological time series. Under the present conditions, the average flood peak sequence is 58.10% higher than in the past, and the flood design value decreases with increasing design frequency; however, when the present sequence increases, the change rates of both flood design values increase. The reservoir overtopping risk increased under the current conditions of snowmelt floods, which was affected by a significant increase in catchment temperature. Moreover, the use of right-angle trapezoidal fuzzy numbers to describe the reservoir overtopping risk was more in line with the objective reality than a traditional triangular fuzzy number. The results of this study can be used for the efficient utilization of water resources in the Manas River catchment and provide a new reference for the scientific management of reservoirs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuan Yang & Fulong Chen & Chaofei He & Zhijun Zhang & Aihua Long, 2020. "Fuzzy risk analysis of dam overtopping from snowmelt floods in the nonstationarity case of the Manas River catchment, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 27-49, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04143-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04143-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04143-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04143-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianzhu Li & Senming Tan & Zhaozhen Wei & Fulong Chen & Ping Feng, 2014. "A New Method of Change Point Detection Using Variable Fuzzy Sets Under Environmental Change," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(14), pages 5125-5138, November.
    2. Chong-Xun Mo & Gui-Yan Mo & Liu Peng & Qing Yang & Xin-Rong Zhu & Qing-Ling Jiang & Ju-Liang Jin, 2019. "Quantitative Vulnerability Model of Earth Dam Overtopping and its Application," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(5), pages 1801-1815, March.
    3. Xingbo Zhou & Zuyu Chen & Shu Yu & Lin Wang & Gang Deng & Peijun Sha & Shouyi Li, 2015. "Risk analysis and emergency actions for Hongshiyan barrier lake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(3), pages 1933-1959, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueyou Zhang & Junfei Chen & Chong Yu & Qian Wang & Tonghui Ding, 2024. "Emergency risk assessment of sudden water pollution in South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China based on driving force–pressure–state–impact–response (DPSIR) model and variable fuzzy set," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20233-20253, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao Gu & Xiao Fu & Yantao Zhu & Yijun Chen & Lixian Huang, 2020. "Analysis of Social and Environmental Impact of Earth-Rock Dam Breaks Based on a Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Xingbo Zhou & Zuyu Chen & Jianping Zhou & Xinlei Guo & Xiaohu Du & Qiang Zhang, 2020. "A quantitative risk analysis model for cascade reservoirs overtopping: principle and application," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 249-277, October.
    3. Wang, Te & Li, Zongkun & Ge, Wei & Zhang, Hua & Zhang, Yadong & Sun, Heqiang & Jiao, Yutie, 2023. "Risk consequence assessment of dam breach in cascade reservoirs considering risk transmission and superposition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Junfei Chen & Menghua Deng & Lu Xia & Huimin Wang, 2017. "Risk Assessment of Drought, Based on IDM-VFS in the Nanpan River Basin, Yunnan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Guanjie He & Junrui Chai & Yuan Qin & Zengguang Xu & Shouyi Li, 2020. "Coupled Model of Variable Fuzzy Sets and the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application to the Social and Environmental Impact Evaluation of Dam Breaks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(9), pages 2677-2697, July.
    6. Feng Yan & Ling Liu & You Zhang & Musong Chen & Ning Chen, 2016. "The Research of Dynamic Variable Fuzzy Set Assessment Model in Water Quality Evaluation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 63-78, January.
    7. Sizhong He & Zhenzhen Ma & Huashan Wang & Yuqin Gao, 2024. "Evolution in Patterns of Urban Water Consumption Accompanying Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:104:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04143-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.