IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v19y2008i1p85-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Konzeption eines aktivitätsorientierten Instruments zur Anlaufkostenplanung

Author

Listed:
  • Herwig Winkler
  • Michael Slamanig

Abstract

The ramp-up of a new product leads to changes and adjustments within the production and logistics system of a firm. This change process causes additional costs. The forecasting and planning of costs incurred during the ramp-up phase is still an unsolved problem within ramp-up management. In order to avoid cost overruns the expected ramp-up costs have to be planned according to the input involved. Therefore, the planning of ramp-up costs has to be based on the processes and activities taking place in the ramp-up. By the use of innovative methods and instruments the planning of ramp-up costs can be supported effectively. Up to now, both in the scientific and business world adequate methods and/or instruments are entirely missing. This contribution provides considerations of how to design an adequate instrument for planning ramp-up costs. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2008

Suggested Citation

  • Herwig Winkler & Michael Slamanig, 2008. "Konzeption eines aktivitätsorientierten Instruments zur Anlaufkostenplanung," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 85-106, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:85-106
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-008-0043-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-008-0043-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-008-0043-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrillo, Janice E. & Franza, Richard M., 2006. "Investing in product development and production capabilities: The crucial linkage between time-to-market and ramp-up time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 536-556, June.
    2. Ben-Arieh, David & Qian, Li, 2003. "Activity-based cost management for design and development stage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 169-183, February.
    3. Terwiesch, Christian & E. Bohn, Roger, 2001. "Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 1-19, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    2. Annika Becker & Raik Stolletz & Thomas Stäblein, 2017. "Strategic ramp-up planning in automotive production networks," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 59-78, January.
    3. Doltsinis, Stefanos C. & Ratchev, Svetan & Lohse, Niels, 2013. "A framework for performance measurement during production ramp-up of assembly stations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 85-94.
    4. Agathe Gilain & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Managing Learning Curves In The Unknown: From ‘Learning By Doing’ To ‘Learning By Designing’," Post-Print hal-01900961, HAL.
    5. Fabio Magnacca & Riccardo Giannetti, 2024. "Management accounting and new product development: a systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 651-685, June.
    6. S. Göttlich & S. Kühn & J. A. Schwarz & R. Stolletz, 2016. "Approximations of time-dependent unreliable flow lines with finite buffers," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 83(3), pages 295-323, June.
    7. Ozer, Muammer, 2007. "Reducing the demand uncertainties at the fuzzy-front-end of developing new online services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 1372-1387, November.
    8. Gülru F. Özkan-Seely & Cheryl Gaimon & Stylianos Kavadias, 2015. "Dynamic Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Development for Product and Process Design Teams," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 177-190, May.
    9. Qian, Li & Ben-Arieh, David, 2008. "Parametric cost estimation based on activity-based costing: A case study for design and development of rotational parts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 805-818, June.
    10. Duffner, Fabian & Mauler, Lukas & Wentker, Marc & Leker, Jens & Winter, Martin, 2021. "Large-scale automotive battery cell manufacturing: Analyzing strategic and operational effects on manufacturing costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    11. Morgan, Horatio M. & Ngwenyama, Ojelanki, 2015. "Real options, learning cost and timing software upgrades: Towards an integrative model for enterprise software upgrade decision analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 211-223.
    12. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Sikstrom, Sverker, 2004. "A numerical comparison of three potential learning and forgetting models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 281-294, December.
    13. Shin, Jang-Sup, 2017. "Dynamic catch-up strategy, capability expansion and changing windows of opportunity in the memory industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 404-416.
    14. Filla, Patrick & Klingebiel, Katja, 2014. "A Risk Management Approach for the Pre-Series Logistics in Production Ramp-Up," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Next Generation Supply Chains: Trends and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), Vol. 18, volume 18, pages 407-422, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    15. Korn, Ralf & Melnyk, Yaroslav & Seifried, Frank Thomas, 2017. "Stochastic impulse control with regime-switching dynamics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1024-1042.
    16. Nadeau, Marie-Claude & Kar, Ashish & Roth, Richard & Kirchain, Randolph, 2010. "A dynamic process-based cost modeling approach to understand learning effects in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 223-234, November.
    17. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2005. "Activity Based Costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization - a case study and beyond," Management Accounting Research Group Working Papers M-2005-04, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    18. Goudarzi, Fatemeh (Sahar) & Olaru, Doina & Bergey, Paul, 2023. "Beyond risk attitude: Unpacking behavioral drivers of supply chain contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Negahban, Ashkan & Dehghanimohammadabadi, Mohammad, 2018. "Optimizing the supply chain configuration and production-sales policies for new products over multiple planning horizons," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 150-162.
    20. Ying-Ju Chen & Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2017. "Dual Coproduct Technologies: Implications for Process Development and Adoption," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 692-712, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:85-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.