IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v18y2016i2d10.1007_s11009-015-9441-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preservation of Stochastic Orders under the Formation of Generalized Distorted Distributions. Applications to Coherent Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Navarro

    (Universidad de Murcia)

  • Yolanda Águila

    (Universidad de Almería)

  • Miguel A. Sordo

    (Universidad de Cádiz)

  • Alfonso Suárez-Llorens

    (Universidad de Cádiz)

Abstract

The preservation of stochastic orders under the formation of coherent systems is a relevant topic in the reliability theory. Several properties have been obtained under the assumption of identically distributed components. In this paper we obtain ordering preservation results for generalized distorted distributions (GDD) which, in particular, can be used to obtain preservation results for coherent systems with non-identically distributed components. We consider both the cases of independent and dependent components. The preservation results obtained here for GDD can also be applied to other statistical concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Navarro & Yolanda Águila & Miguel A. Sordo & Alfonso Suárez-Llorens, 2016. "Preservation of Stochastic Orders under the Formation of Generalized Distorted Distributions. Applications to Coherent Systems," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 529-545, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:18:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-015-9441-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-015-9441-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-015-9441-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-015-9441-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    2. Wang, Shaun, 1996. "Premium Calculation by Transforming the Layer Premium Density," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 71-92, May.
    3. Khaledi, Baha-Eldin & Shaked, Moshe, 2010. "Stochastic comparisons of multivariate mixtures," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(10), pages 2486-2498, November.
    4. Quiggin, John, 1982. "A theory of anticipated utility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 323-343, December.
    5. Jorge Navarro & Fabio Spizzichino, 2010. "Comparisons of series and parallel systems with components sharing the same copula," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 775-791, November.
    6. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2011. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted variability measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 11-17, July.
    7. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R., 1998. "Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus Yaari's dual theory of risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 145-161, June.
    8. Navarro, Jorge & Pellerey, Franco & Di Crescenzo, Antonio, 2015. "Orderings of coherent systems with randomized dependent components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 127-139.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Arriaza & Jorge Navarro & Alfonso Suárez‐Llorens, 2018. "Stochastic comparisons of replacement policies in coherent systems under minimal repair," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(6-7), pages 550-565, September.
    2. Jorge Navarro, 2018. "Distribution-free comparisons of residual lifetimes of coherent systems based on copula properties," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 781-800, June.
    3. M. Kelkinnama & M. Asadi, 2019. "Stochastic and ageing properties of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 805-821, June.
    4. Mansour Shrahili & Mohamed Kayid & Mhamed Mesfioui, 2023. "Relative Orderings of Modified Proportional Hazard Rate and Modified Proportional Reversed Hazard Rate Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-28, November.
    5. Siddhartha Chakraborty & Biswabrata Pradhan, 2024. "On cumulative residual extropy of coherent and mixed systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 340(1), pages 59-81, September.
    6. Patryk Miziuła & Jorge Navarro, 2017. "Sharp bounds for the reliability of systems and mixtures with ordered components," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 108-116, March.
    7. Jorge Navarro & Maria Longobardi & Franco Pellerey, 2017. "Comparison results for inactivity times of k-out-of-n and general coherent systems with dependent components," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(4), pages 822-846, December.
    8. Jorge Navarro & Yolanda Águila, 2017. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted distributions, coherent systems and mixtures with ordered components," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(6), pages 627-648, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Nitin & Misra, Neeraj & Kumar, Somesh, 2015. "Stochastic comparisons of residual lifetimes and inactivity times of coherent systems with dependent identically distributed components," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 425-430.
    2. Belles-Sampera, Jaume & Merigó, José M. & Guillén, Montserrat & Santolino, Miguel, 2013. "The connection between distortion risk measures and ordered weighted averaging operators," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 411-420.
    3. Francesca Greselin & Ričardas Zitikis, 2018. "From the Classical Gini Index of Income Inequality to a New Zenga-Type Relative Measure of Risk: A Modeller’s Perspective," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Greselin, Francesca & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2015. "Measuring economic inequality and risk: a unifying approach based on personal gambles, societal preferences and references," MPRA Paper 65892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Leitner, Johannes, 2005. "Dilatation monotonous Choquet integrals," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 994-1006, December.
    6. Kaluszka, M. & Laeven, R.J.A. & Okolewski, A., 2012. "A note on weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 379-381.
    7. Leili Javanmardi & Yuri Lawryshyn, 2016. "A new rank dependent utility approach to model risk averse preferences in portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 161-176, February.
    8. Belzunce, Félix & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso & Sordo, Miguel A., 2012. "Comparison of increasing directionally convex transformations of random vectors with a common copula," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 385-390.
    9. Elisa Pagani, 2015. "Certainty Equivalent: Many Meanings of a Mean," Working Papers 24/2015, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    10. Xiaoqing Liang & Ruodu Wang & Virginia Young, 2021. "Optimal Insurance to Maximize RDEU Under a Distortion-Deviation Premium Principle," Papers 2107.02656, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    11. Belzunce, Félix & Pinar, José F. & Ruiz, José M. & Sordo, Miguel A., 2012. "Comparison of risks based on the expected proportional shortfall," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 292-302.
    12. repec:bpj:demode:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:156-177:n:10 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Miguel Sordo & Jorge Navarro & José Sarabia, 2014. "Distorted Lorenz curves: models and comparisons," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 761-780, April.
    14. Boonen, Tim J., 2017. "Risk Redistribution Games With Dual Utilities," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 303-329, January.
    15. Robert, Christian Y. & Therond, Pierre-E., 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures, Ambiguity Aversion And Optimal Effort," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 277-302, May.
    16. van Bruggen, Paul & Laeven, Roger J. A. & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2024. "Higher-Order Risk Attitudes for Non-Expected Utility," Discussion Paper 2024-019, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    17. Ruodu Wang & Johanna F. Ziegel, 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures and Elicitability," Papers 1405.3769, arXiv.org, revised May 2014.
    18. Heilpern, S., 2003. "A rank-dependent generalization of zero utility principle," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 67-73, August.
    19. Holly Brannelly & Andrea Macrina & Gareth W. Peters, 2021. "Stochastic measure distortions induced by quantile processes for risk quantification and valuation," Papers 2201.02045, arXiv.org.
    20. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2011. "Stochastic comparisons of distorted variability measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 11-17, July.
    21. Huang, Helen & Wang, Yanjie & Zhang, Shunming, 2021. "Prudence attitude and limited participation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:18:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11009-015-9441-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.