IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metcap/v16y2014i3d10.1007_s11009-012-9316-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value at Ruin and Tail Value at Ruin of the Compound Poisson Process with Diffusion and Efficient Computational Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Gatto

    (University of Bern)

  • Benjamin Baumgartner

    (University of Bern)

Abstract

We analyze the insurer risk under the compound Poisson risk process perturbed by a Wiener process with infinite time horizon. In the first part of this article, we consider the capital required to have fixed probability of ruin as a measure of risk and then a coherent extension of it, analogous to the tail value at risk. We show how both measures of risk can be efficiently computed by the saddlepoint approximation. We also show how to compute the stabilities of these measures of risk with respect to variations of probability of ruin. In the second part of this article, we are interested in the computation of the probability of ruin due to claim and the probability of ruin due to oscillation. We suggest a computational method based on upper and lower bounds of the probability of ruin and we compare it to the saddlepoint and to the Fast Fourier transform methods. This alternative method can be used to evaluate the proposed measures of risk and their stabilities with heavy-tailed individual losses, where the saddlepoint approximation cannot be used. The numerical accuracy of all proposed methods is very high and therefore these measures of risk can be reliably used in actuarial risk analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Gatto & Benjamin Baumgartner, 2014. "Value at Ruin and Tail Value at Ruin of the Compound Poisson Process with Diffusion and Efficient Computational Methods," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 561-582, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:16:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-012-9316-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11009-012-9316-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11009-012-9316-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11009-012-9316-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dufresne, François & Gerber, Hans U., 1989. "Three Methods to Calculate the Probability of Ruin," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 71-90, April.
    2. Riccardo Gatto, 2012. "Saddlepoint Approximations to Tail Probabilities and Quantiles of Inhomogeneous Discounted Compound Poisson Processes with Periodic Intensity Functions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1053-1074, December.
    3. Riccardo Gatto, 2010. "A Saddlepoint Approximation to the Distribution of Inhomogeneous Discounted Compound Poisson Processes," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 533-551, September.
    4. Dufresne, Francois & Gerber, Hans U., 1991. "Risk theory for the compound Poisson process that is perturbed by diffusion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 51-59, March.
    5. Wang, Suojin, 1995. "One-step saddlepoint approximations for quantiles," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 65-74, July.
    6. Patrick Cheridito & Freddy Delbaen & Michael Kupper, 2006. "Coherent and convex monetary risk measures for unbounded càdlàg processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 427-448, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne & Trufin, Julien & Zuyderhoff, Pierre, 2020. "Ruin-based risk measures in discrete-time risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 246-261.
    2. Riccardo Gatto & Benjamin Baumgartner, 2016. "Saddlepoint Approximations to the Probability of Ruin in Finite Time for the Compound Poisson Risk Process Perturbed by Diffusion," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 217-235, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gatto, Riccardo, 2008. "A saddlepoint approximation to the probability of ruin in the compound Poisson process with diffusion," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(13), pages 1948-1954, September.
    2. Yacine Koucha & Alfredo D. Egidio dos Reis, 2021. "Approximations to ultimate ruin probabilities with a Wienner process perturbation," Papers 2107.02537, arXiv.org.
    3. Gerber, Hans U. & Shiu, Elias S.W. & Yang, Hailiang, 2013. "Valuing equity-linked death benefits in jump diffusion models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 615-623.
    4. Riccardo Gatto, 2019. "Saddlepoint Approximation for Data in Simplices: A Review with New Applications," Stats, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Riccardo Gatto & Benjamin Baumgartner, 2016. "Saddlepoint Approximations to the Probability of Ruin in Finite Time for the Compound Poisson Risk Process Perturbed by Diffusion," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 217-235, March.
    6. Riccardo Gatto, 2012. "Saddlepoint Approximations to Tail Probabilities and Quantiles of Inhomogeneous Discounted Compound Poisson Processes with Periodic Intensity Functions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1053-1074, December.
    7. Franck Adékambi & Essodina Takouda, 2020. "Gerber–Shiu Function in a Class of Delayed and Perturbed Risk Model with Dependence," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Zhang, Aili & Li, Shuanming & Wang, Wenyuan, 2023. "A scale function based approach for solving integral-differential equations in insurance risk models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 450(C).
    9. Avram, F. & Pistorius, M., 2014. "On matrix exponential approximations of ruin probabilities for the classic and Brownian perturbed Cramér–Lundberg processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 57-64.
    10. Kolkovska, Ekaterina T. & Martín-González, Ehyter M., 2016. "Gerber–Shiu functionals for classical risk processes perturbed by an α-stable motion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 22-28.
    11. Loisel, Stéphane & Trufin, Julien, 2014. "Properties of a risk measure derived from the expected area in red," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 191-199.
    12. Yang, Hu & Zhang, Zhimin, 2009. "The perturbed compound Poisson risk model with multi-layer dividend strategy," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 70-78, January.
    13. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Parra-Alvarez, Juan Carlos & Serrano, Rafael, 2021. "Optimal control of investment, premium and deductible for a non-life insurance company," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 384-405.
    14. Liang, Xiaoqing & Liang, Zhibin & Young, Virginia R., 2020. "Optimal reinsurance under the mean–variance premium principle to minimize the probability of ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 128-146.
    15. Constantinescu, Corina & Hashorva, Enkelejd & Ji, Lanpeng, 2011. "Archimedean copulas in finite and infinite dimensions—with application to ruin problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 487-495.
    16. Chi, Yichun, 2010. "Analysis of the expected discounted penalty function for a general jump-diffusion risk model and applications in finance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 385-396, April.
    17. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel & Muhsin Tamturk & Sergey Utev, 2018. "A Quantum-Type Approach to Non-Life Insurance Risk Modelling," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani & Kehan Li, 2017. "Measuring risks in the extreme tail: The extreme VaR and its confidence interval," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01317391, HAL.
    19. Tsai, Cary Chi-Liang & Willmot, Gordon E., 2002. "A generalized defective renewal equation for the surplus process perturbed by diffusion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 51-66, February.
    20. Chi, Yichun & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2011. "On the threshold dividend strategy for a generalized jump-diffusion risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 326-337, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metcap:v:16:y:2014:i:3:d:10.1007_s11009-012-9316-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.