IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/mathme/v57y2003i3p481-493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperation and competition in inventory games

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Meca
  • Ignacio García-Jurado
  • Peter Borm

Abstract

Inventory cost games are introduced in Meca et al. (1999). These games arise when considering the possibility of joint ordering in n-person EOQ inventory situations. Moreover, the SOC-rule is introduced and analysed as a cost allocation rule for this type of situations. In the current paper it is seen that n-person EPQ situations with shortages lead to exactly the same class of cost games. Furthermore, an alternative characterization of the SOC-rule is offered, primarily based on a transfer property which constitutes a special form of additivity. Necessary input variables for the SOC-rule are the (optimal) individual average number of orders per time unit in case there is no cooperation. Assuming that these average numbers are observable but not verifiable, we allow the players to select them strategically, while knowing that the SOC-rule will be (consecutively) applied as the cost allocation principle. Necessary and sufficient conditions are provided for the existence (and uniqueness) of a so-called constructive equilibrium in which all players make joint orders. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Meca & Ignacio García-Jurado & Peter Borm, 2003. "Cooperation and competition in inventory games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 57(3), pages 481-493, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:57:y:2003:i:3:p:481-493
    DOI: 10.1007/s001860200253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s001860200253
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s001860200253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Tri-Dung, 2024. "Game of banks - biform game theoretical framework for ATM network cost sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1158-1178.
    2. Evren Körpeoğlu & Alper Şen & Kemal Güler, 2012. "A private contributions game for joint replenishment," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(1), pages 67-82, February.
    3. Ana Meca & Luis Guardiola & Andrés Toledo, 2007. "p-additive games: a class of totally balanced games arising from inventory situations with temporary discounts," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(2), pages 322-340, December.
    4. M. Fiestras-Janeiro & I. García-Jurado & A. Meca & M. Mosquera, 2012. "Cost allocation in inventory transportation systems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(2), pages 397-410, July.
    5. Güler, Kemal & Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper, 2017. "Design and analysis of mechanisms for decentralized joint replenishment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 992-1002.
    6. Padilla Tinoco, Silvia Valeria & Creemers, Stefan & Boute, Robert N., 2017. "Collaborative shipping under different cost-sharing agreements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 827-837.
    7. Simai He & Jay Sethuraman & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2017. "A NonCooperative Approach to Cost Allocation in Joint Replenishment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1562-1573, December.
    8. Béal, Sylvain & Ferrières, Sylvain & Rémila, Eric & Solal, Philippe, 2018. "The proportional Shapley value and applications," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 93-112.
    9. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Slikker, Marco & Van Woensel, Tom, 2018. "Collaborative replenishment in the presence of intermediaries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 135-146.
    10. Bernstein, Fernando & Gürhan Kök, A. & Meca, Ana, 2015. "Cooperation in assembly systems: The role of knowledge sharing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 160-171.
    11. Körpeoğlu, Evren & Şen, Alper & Güler, Kemal, 2013. "Non-cooperative joint replenishment under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 434-443.
    12. D. Bauso & J. Timmer, 2009. "Robust dynamic cooperative games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(1), pages 23-36, March.
    13. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2009. "Production-inventory games: A new class of totally balanced combinatorial optimization games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 205-219, January.
    14. J. Drechsel & A. Kimms, 2010. "The subcoalition-perfect core of cooperative games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 591-601, December.
    15. Perea, F. & Puerto, J. & Fernández, F.R., 2009. "Modeling cooperation on a class of distribution problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 726-733, November.
    16. Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G. & García-Jurado, I. & Meca, A. & Mosquera, M.A., 2011. "Cooperative game theory and inventory management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 459-466, May.
    17. M. Mosquera & I. García-Jurado & M. Fiestras-Janeiro, 2008. "A note on coalitional manipulation and centralized inventory management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 183-188, February.
    18. Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Qian, Qian & Zhou, Yongwu, 2021. "Altruistic profit allocation rules for joint replenishment with carbon cap-and-trade policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 956-967.
    19. Behzad Hezarkhani & Greys Sošić, 2019. "Who’s Afraid of Strategic Behavior? Mechanisms for Group Purchasing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 933-954, April.
    20. Li, Jun & Feng, Hairong & Zeng, Yinlian, 2014. "Inventory games with permissible delay in payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 694-700.
    21. Ana Meca, 2007. "A core-allocation family for generalized holding cost games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 65(3), pages 499-517, June.
    22. M Dror & B C Hartman, 2011. "Survey of cooperative inventory games and extensions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 565-580, April.
    23. Guardiola, Luis A. & Meca, Ana & Puerto, Justo, 2008. "Production-inventory games and PMAS-games: Characterizations of the Owen point," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 96-108, July.
    24. Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G. & García-Jurado, I. & Meca, A. & Mosquera, M.A., 2015. "Cooperation on capacitated inventory situations with fixed holding costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(3), pages 719-726.
    25. Drechsel, J. & Kimms, A., 2010. "Computing core allocations in cooperative games with an application to cooperative procurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 310-321, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mathme:v:57:y:2003:i:3:p:481-493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.