IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v30y2025i1d10.1007_s11027-024-10184-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Definitions and mechanisms for managing durability and reversals in standards and procurers of carbon dioxide removal

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Arcusa

    (Arizona State University)

  • Emily Hagood

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

Carbon markets are expanding to include various forms of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). Standards used in the certification of CDR must define the durability of removals and implement mechanisms to manage carbon that escapes from storage. These definitions and mechanisms will impact the ability of a global carbon management system to reach and maintain carbon neutrality targets in the long term. Collecting data from 28 international standard developing organizations (SDOs) and 268 proposals received by one large carbon removal purchaser, we reviewed the different definitions and mechanisms proposed to implement durability and manage carbon loss from storage. We find that standards most often use a stipulated contractual duration of storage of 100 years, but ranges from 10 to beyond 100 years. Project developers expect their storage to last between 1 year and 10 million years and most seem willing to provide a guarantee of storage duration. Six different mechanisms are used by SDOs to manage durability and four to manage carbon loss from storage during the contractual timeframe, but the rationale for a choice is not clearly associated with the CDR method, the stipulated duration, or the type of market. The most used mechanisms are commitment periods for durability, and buffer pools and required compensation for reversal management. Although it is an incomplete picture, this global system covers a wide range of durability and stipulated contractual durations; shows signs of common practices; shows a willingness to guarantee storage; has multiple mechanism options; and has no clear association between the choice of mechanism and the type of CDR method, stipulated duration, or type of market. Further work should focus on analyzing the trade-offs for each mechanism and informing the definition of permanent storage so a global carbon management system can develop to maintain carbon neutrality targets in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Arcusa & Emily Hagood, 2025. "Definitions and mechanisms for managing durability and reversals in standards and procurers of carbon dioxide removal," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10184-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-024-10184-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-024-10184-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-024-10184-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10184-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.