IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v30y2025i1d10.1007_s11027-024-10184-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Definitions and mechanisms for managing durability and reversals in standards and procurers of carbon dioxide removal

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Arcusa

    (Arizona State University)

  • Emily Hagood

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

Carbon markets are expanding to include various forms of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). Standards used in the certification of CDR must define the durability of removals and implement mechanisms to manage carbon that escapes from storage. These definitions and mechanisms will impact the ability of a global carbon management system to reach and maintain carbon neutrality targets in the long term. Collecting data from 28 international standard developing organizations (SDOs) and 268 proposals received by one large carbon removal purchaser, we reviewed the different definitions and mechanisms proposed to implement durability and manage carbon loss from storage. We find that standards most often use a stipulated contractual duration of storage of 100 years, but ranges from 10 to beyond 100 years. Project developers expect their storage to last between 1 year and 10 million years and most seem willing to provide a guarantee of storage duration. Six different mechanisms are used by SDOs to manage durability and four to manage carbon loss from storage during the contractual timeframe, but the rationale for a choice is not clearly associated with the CDR method, the stipulated duration, or the type of market. The most used mechanisms are commitment periods for durability, and buffer pools and required compensation for reversal management. Although it is an incomplete picture, this global system covers a wide range of durability and stipulated contractual durations; shows signs of common practices; shows a willingness to guarantee storage; has multiple mechanism options; and has no clear association between the choice of mechanism and the type of CDR method, stipulated duration, or type of market. Further work should focus on analyzing the trade-offs for each mechanism and informing the definition of permanent storage so a global carbon management system can develop to maintain carbon neutrality targets in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Arcusa & Emily Hagood, 2025. "Definitions and mechanisms for managing durability and reversals in standards and procurers of carbon dioxide removal," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10184-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-024-10184-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-024-10184-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-024-10184-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Kalkuhl & Max Franks & Friedemann Gruner & Kai Lessmann & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2022. "Pigou’s Advice and Sisyphus’ Warning: Carbon Pricing with Non-Permanent Carbon-Dioxide Removal," CESifo Working Paper Series 10169, CESifo.
    2. Veronika Dornburg & Gregg Marland, 2008. "Temporary storage of carbon in the biosphere does have value for climate change mitigation: a response to the paper by Miko Kirschbaum," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 211-217, March.
    3. Johannes Bednar & Michael Obersteiner & Fabian Wagner, 2019. "On the financial viability of negative emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-4, December.
    4. Dutschke, Michael & Schlamadinger, Bernhard & Wong, Jenny L.P. & Rumberg, Michael, 2004. "Value and Risks of Expiring Carbon Credits from CDM Afforestation and Reforestation," Discussion Paper Series 26347, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    5. Miko Kirschbaum, 2006. "Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 1151-1164, September.
    6. Jessica F. Green, 2013. "Order out of Chaos: Public and Private Rules for Managing Carbon," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Dutschke, Michael & Schlamadinger, Bernhard & Wong-Leung, Jenny P. & Rumberg, Michael, 2004. "Value and Risks of Expiring Carbon Credits from CDM Afforestation and Reforestation," HWWA Discussion Papers 290, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    8. Arcusa, Stephanie & Lackner, Klaus, 2022. "Intergenerational equity and responsibility: a call to internalize impermanence into certifying carbon sequestration," OSF Preprints b3wkr, Center for Open Science.
    9. Lucas Joppa & Amy Luers & Elizabeth Willmott & S. Julio Friedmann & Steven P. Hamburg & Rafael Broze, 2021. "Microsoft’s million-tonne CO2-removal purchase — lessons for net zero," Nature, Nature, vol. 597(7878), pages 629-632, September.
    10. Till Neeff & Francisco Ascui, 2009. "Lessons from carbon markets for designing an effective REDD architecture," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 306-315, May.
    11. Tas Thamo & David J. Pannell, 2016. "Challenges in developing effective policy for soil carbon sequestration: perspectives on additionality, leakage, and permanence," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 973-992, November.
    12. Stephanie Arcusa & Starry Sprenkle-Hyppolite, 2022. "Snapshot of the Carbon Dioxide Removal certification and standards ecosystem (2021–2022)," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1319-1332, November.
    13. Matthew Brander, 2022. "There Should be More Normative Research on How Social and Environmental Accounting Should be Done," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1-2), pages 11-17, May.
    14. Annie Levasseur & Miguel Brandão & Pascal Lesage & Manuele Margni & David Pennington & Roland Clift & Réjean Samson, 2012. "Valuing temporary carbon storage," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(1), pages 6-8, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arcusa, Stephanie & Hagood, Emily, 2023. "Definitions and mechanisms for managing durability and reversals in standards and procurers of carbon dioxide removal," OSF Preprints 6bth5, Center for Open Science.
    2. Parisa, Zack & Marland, Eric & Sohngen, Brent & Marland, Gregg & Jenkins, Jennifer, 2022. "The time value of carbon storage," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Delacote, Philippe & Palmer, Charles & Bakkegaard, Riyong Kim & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2014. "Unveiling information on opportunity costs in REDD: Who obtains the surplus when policy objectives differ?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 508-527.
    4. H. Damon Matthews & Kirsten Zickfeld & Alexander Koch & Amy Luers, 2023. "Accounting for the climate benefit of temporary carbon storage in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Pajot, Guillaume, 8. "Carbon credits and the forest sector," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 41, May.
    6. Bode, Sven & Jung, Martina, 2004. "On the Integration of Carbon Capture and Storage into the International Climate Regime," Discussion Paper Series 26279, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.
    7. Sven Bode & Martina Jung, 2006. "Carbon dioxide capture and storage—liability for non-permanence under the UNFCCC," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 173-186, June.
    8. Chisholm, Ryan A., 2010. "Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1973-1987, August.
    9. Bode, Sven & Jung, Martina, 2004. "On the Integration of Carbon Capture and Storage into the International Climate Regime," HWWA Discussion Papers 303, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    10. Marshall, Liz & Kelly, Alexia, 2010. "The Time Value of Carbon and Carbon Storage: Clarifying the terms and the policy implications of the debate," MPRA Paper 27326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Feng, Jing-Chun & Sun, Liwei & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Carbon sequestration via shellfish farming: A potential negative emissions technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. Rickels, Wilfried & Rehdanz, Katrin & Oschlies, Andreas, 2010. "Methods for greenhouse gas offset accounting: A case study of ocean iron fertilization," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2495-2509, October.
    13. Rickels, Wilfried & Rehdanz, Katrin & Oschlies, Andreas, 2009. "Accounting aspects of ocean iron fertilization," Kiel Working Papers 1572, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Emma Paulsson, 2009. "A review of the CDM literature: from fine-tuning to critical scrutiny?," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 63-80, February.
    15. Paschen, Marius & Meier, Felix & Rickels, Wilfried, 2022. "Accounting for terrestrial and marine carbon sink enhancement," Kiel Working Papers 2204, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), revised 2022.
    16. J. Sartori, Pedro & Schons, Stella Z. & Amacher, Gregory S. & Burkhart, Harold, 2024. "Deferred rotation carbon programs for even-aged forests: Aligning landowner and societal objectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Thamo, Tas & Addai, Donkor & Kragt, Marit E. & Kingwell, Ross S. & Pannell, David J. & Robertson, Michael J., 2019. "Climate change reduces the mitigation obtainable from sequestration in an Australian farming system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(4), October.
    18. Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1437-1455, December.
    19. Blum, Mareike, 2020. "Whose climate? Whose forest? Power struggles in a contested carbon forestry project in Uganda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Howard, Rebecca Joy & Tallontire, Anne & Stringer, Lindsay & Marchant, Rob, 2015. "Unraveling the Notion of “Fair Carbon”: Key Challenges for Standards Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 343-356.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:30:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10184-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.