IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v29y2024i7d10.1007_s11027-024-10166-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oil palm agroforestry systems store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than monoculture in the Amazon

Author

Listed:
  • Raimundo Leonardo Lima Oliveira

    (State University of Mato Grosso (UNEMAT))

  • Mila Façanha Gomes

    (Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA))

  • Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior

    (Graduate Program in Ecology and Conservation at the State University of Paraíba (UEPB))

  • Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira

    (Embrapa Soils (CNPS))

  • Débora Cristina Castellani

    (Natura Product Innovation and Technology Ltda)

  • Osvaldo Ryohei Kato

    (Embrapa Eastern Amazon (CPATU))

  • Steel Silva Vasconcelos

    (Embrapa Forestry)

Abstract

Agroforestry systems (AFSs) are known to store more carbon and nitrogen in the soil when compared with monocultures. However, studies involving carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates in oil palm plantations, an important global commodity, in AFSs and monocultures are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine whether oil palm AFSs are able to store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than when planted in monoculture. We collected soil samples in the 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm layers in an oil palm AFS (10 years old) and in an oil palm monoculture (9 years old) in Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon, Brazil. We determined soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen contents in macro and microaggregates, and root biomass. Overall, more carbon was stored in the macroaggregates than in the microaggregates in the oil palm plantations. The carbon storage was higher in macro and microaggregates in the AFSs (macro: 12.97 ± 0.35 and micro: 0.53 ± 0.01) than in the monoculture (macro: 11.60 ± 0.19 e micro: 0.29 ± 0.01) in the 0–10 cm layer of the soil. The total soil carbon stock in the 0–30 cm layer was higher in the AFSs (38.08 ± 0.13 Mg ha−1) than in the monoculture (31.79 ± 1.23 Mg ha−1). The AFSs showed a trend towards greater aggregate stability (range throughout the soil profile 4.70 ± 0.07 to 3.31 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the monoculture (4.71 ± 0.02 to 2.71 ± 0.23 mm). Therefore, oil palm AFSs have a greater potential to store carbon in soil aggregates and, consequently, contribute more to climate change mitigation than oil palm monocultures. As such, our results have important implications for the sustainable cultivation and exploitation of the oil palm in the Amazon and in other regions of the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimundo Leonardo Lima Oliveira & Mila Façanha Gomes & Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior & Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira & Débora Cristina Castellani & Osvaldo Ryohei Kato & Steel Silva Vasconcelos, 2024. "Oil palm agroforestry systems store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than monoculture in the Amazon," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:29:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10166-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:29:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s11027-024-10166-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.