IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v23y2018i5d10.1007_s11027-017-9753-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget in the forestry of China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xiaoke Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Bojie Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd.)

  • Yunjian Luo

    (Yangzhou University)

  • Fei Lu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Joint Center for Global Change Studies)

  • Zhiyun Ouyang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Forest management to increase carbon (C) sinks and reduce C emissions and forest resource utilization to store C and substitute for fossil fuel have been identified as attractive mitigation strategies. However, the greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of carbon pools and sinks in China are not fully understood, and the forestry net C sink must be determined. The objective of this study was to analyze potential forest management mitigation strategies by evaluating the GHG emissions from forest management and resource utilization and clarify the forestry net C sink, and its driving factors in China via constructing C accounting and net mitigation of forestry methodology. The results indicated that the GHG emissions under forest management and resource utilization were 17.7 Tg Ce/year and offset 8.5% of biomass and products C sink and GHG mitigation from substitution effects from 2000 to 2014, resulting in a net C sink of 189.8 Tg Ce/year. Forest resource utilization contributed the most to the national forestry GHG emissions, whereas the main driving factor underlying regional GHG emissions varied. Afforestation dominated the GHG emissions in the southwest and northwest, whereas resource utilization contributed the most to GHG emissions in the north, northeast, east, and south. Furthermore, decreased wood production, improved product use efficiency, and forests developed for bioenergy represented important mitigation strategies and should be targeted implementation in different regions. Our study provided a forestry C accounting in China and indicated that simulations of these activities could provide novel insights for mitigation strategies and have implications for forest management in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Liu & Xiaoke Wang & Bojie Liu & Yunjian Luo & Fei Lu & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2018. "Full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget in the forestry of China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 643-666, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11027-017-9753-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-017-9753-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-017-9753-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-017-9753-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Buchholz & Stephen Prisley & Gregg Marland & Charles Canham & Neil Sampson, 2014. "Uncertainty in projecting GHG emissions from bioenergy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1045-1047, December.
    2. Chunhua Zhang & Weimin Ju & Jing Chen & Mei Zan & Dengqiu Li & Yanlian Zhou & Xiqun Wang, 2013. "China’s forest biomass carbon sink based on seven inventories from 1973 to 2008," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 933-948, June.
    3. Tian, Yihui & Zhu, Qinghua & Geng, Yong, 2013. "An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 352-361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John M. DeCicco, 2018. "Methodological Issues Regarding Biofuels and Carbon Uptake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Jialin Liu & Yi Zhu & Qun Zhang & Fangyan Cheng & Xi Hu & Xinhong Cui & Lang Zhang & Zhenglin Sun, 2020. "Transportation Carbon Emissions from a Perspective of Sustainable Development in Major Cities of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Li Dai & Yufang Zhang & Lei Wang & Shuanli Zheng & Wenqiang Xu, 2021. "Assessment of Carbon Density in Natural Mountain Forest Ecosystems at Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Xiaolei, 2015. "Carbon emissions from energy intensive industry in China: Evidence from the iron & steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 746-754.
    5. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Decomposing the change in energy consumption in China's nonferrous metal industry: An empirical analysis based on the LMDI method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2652-2663.
    6. Liu, Zhe & Adams, Michelle & Cote, Raymond P. & Geng, Yong & Chen, Qinghua & Liu, Weili & Sun, Lu & Yu, Xiaoman, 2017. "Comprehensive development of industrial symbiosis for the response of greenhouse gases emission mitigation: Challenges and opportunities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 88-95.
    7. Sumabat, Ana Karmela & Lopez, Neil Stephen & Yu, Krista Danielle & Hao, Han & Li, Richard & Geng, Yong & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2016. "Decomposition analysis of Philippine CO2 emissions from fuel combustion and electricity generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 795-804.
    8. Huang, Beijia & Zhao, Juan & Geng, Yong & Tian, Yihui & Jiang, Ping, 2017. "Energy-related GHG emissions of the textile industry in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 69-77.
    9. Lin, Boqiang & Zhang, Zihan, 2016. "Carbon emissions in China׳s cement industry: A sector and policy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1387-1394.
    10. Ming-Ming Zhao & Rongrong Li, 2018. "Decoupling and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions from economic output in Chinese Guangdong Province: A sector perspective," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(4), pages 543-555, June.
    11. Liu, Zhe & Geng, Yong & Adams, Michelle & Dong, Liang & Sun, Lina & Zhao, Jingjing & Dong, Huijuan & Wu, Jiao & Tian, Xu, 2016. "Uncovering driving forces on greenhouse gas emissions in China’ aluminum industry from the perspective of life cycle analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 253-263.
    12. Mihaela Simionescu & Yuriy Bilan & Stanisław Gędek & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "The Effects of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Cereal Production in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Ke Wang & Linan Che & Chunbo Ma & Yi-Ming Wei, 2017. "The Shadow Price of CO2 Emissions in China's Iron and Steel Industry," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 105, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    14. Zhili Chen & Jinzhuo Wu, 2022. "Evolution of Logistics Industry Carbon Emissions in Heilongjiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Wang, Xiaoyang & Yu, Biying & An, Runying & Sun, Feihu & Xu, Shuo, 2022. "An integrated analysis of China’s iron and steel industry towards carbon neutrality," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    16. Wang, Peng & Jiang, Zeyi & Geng, Xinyi & Hao, Shiyu & Zhang, Xinxin, 2014. "Quantification of Chinese steel cycle flow: Historical status and future options," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 191-199.
    17. Tan, Xianchun & Dong, Lele & Chen, Dexue & Gu, Baihe & Zeng, Yuan, 2016. "China’s regional CO2 emissions reduction potential: A study of Chongqing city," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1345-1354.
    18. Li, Shupeng & Niu, Liping & Yue, Qiang & Zhang, Tingan, 2022. "Trajectory, driving forces, and mitigation potential of energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China's primary aluminum industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    19. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Kuskana Kubaha, 2018. "A Relational Analysis Model of the Causal Factors Influencing CO 2 in Thailand’s Industrial Sector under a Sustainability Policy Adapting the VARIMAX-ECM Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Zhang, Wei & You, Jianmin & Lin, Weiwen, 2021. "Internet plus and China industrial system's low-carbon development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11027-017-9753-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.