IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v23y2018i5d10.1007_s11027-017-9753-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget in the forestry of China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xiaoke Wang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Bojie Liu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd.)

  • Yunjian Luo

    (Yangzhou University)

  • Fei Lu

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
    Joint Center for Global Change Studies)

  • Zhiyun Ouyang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Forest management to increase carbon (C) sinks and reduce C emissions and forest resource utilization to store C and substitute for fossil fuel have been identified as attractive mitigation strategies. However, the greenhouse gas (GHG) budget of carbon pools and sinks in China are not fully understood, and the forestry net C sink must be determined. The objective of this study was to analyze potential forest management mitigation strategies by evaluating the GHG emissions from forest management and resource utilization and clarify the forestry net C sink, and its driving factors in China via constructing C accounting and net mitigation of forestry methodology. The results indicated that the GHG emissions under forest management and resource utilization were 17.7 Tg Ce/year and offset 8.5% of biomass and products C sink and GHG mitigation from substitution effects from 2000 to 2014, resulting in a net C sink of 189.8 Tg Ce/year. Forest resource utilization contributed the most to the national forestry GHG emissions, whereas the main driving factor underlying regional GHG emissions varied. Afforestation dominated the GHG emissions in the southwest and northwest, whereas resource utilization contributed the most to GHG emissions in the north, northeast, east, and south. Furthermore, decreased wood production, improved product use efficiency, and forests developed for bioenergy represented important mitigation strategies and should be targeted implementation in different regions. Our study provided a forestry C accounting in China and indicated that simulations of these activities could provide novel insights for mitigation strategies and have implications for forest management in other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Liu & Xiaoke Wang & Bojie Liu & Yunjian Luo & Fei Lu & Zhiyun Ouyang, 2018. "Full accounting of the greenhouse gas budget in the forestry of China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 643-666, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11027-017-9753-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-017-9753-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-017-9753-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-017-9753-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Buchholz & Stephen Prisley & Gregg Marland & Charles Canham & Neil Sampson, 2014. "Uncertainty in projecting GHG emissions from bioenergy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1045-1047, December.
    2. Tian, Yihui & Zhu, Qinghua & Geng, Yong, 2013. "An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 352-361.
    3. Chunhua Zhang & Weimin Ju & Jing Chen & Mei Zan & Dengqiu Li & Yanlian Zhou & Xiqun Wang, 2013. "China’s forest biomass carbon sink based on seven inventories from 1973 to 2008," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 933-948, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Buchholz & John Gunn & Bruce Springsteen & Gregg Marland & Max Moritz & David Saah, 2022. "Probability-based accounting for carbon in forests to consider wildfire and other stochastic events: synchronizing science, policy, and carbon offsets," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Chen Ya & Zhang Xintian & Liu Haoxiang, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Capacity Utilization on Carbon Dioxide Emission: Evidence from China’s Iron and Steel Industry," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(6), pages 681-703, December.
    3. Oskar Englund & Ioannis Dimitriou & Virginia H. Dale & Keith L. Kline & Blas Mola‐Yudego & Fionnuala Murphy & Burton English & John McGrath & Gerald Busch & Maria Cristina Negri & Mark Brown & Kevin G, 2020. "Multifunctional perennial production systems for bioenergy: performance and progress," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(5), September.
    4. Ouyang, Xiaoling & Lin, Boqiang, 2015. "An analysis of the driving forces of energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in China’s industrial sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 838-849.
    5. Yang Yi & Chen Zhang & Jinqi Zhu & Yugang Zhang & Hao Sun & Hongzhang Kang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Prediction and Optimization of LUCC Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Models: A Case Study of Mentougou District, Beijing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Alajmi, Reema Gh, 2021. "Factors that impact greenhouse gas emissions in Saudi Arabia: Decomposition analysis using LMDI," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. John M. DeCicco, 2018. "Methodological Issues Regarding Biofuels and Carbon Uptake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Jialin Liu & Yi Zhu & Qun Zhang & Fangyan Cheng & Xi Hu & Xinhong Cui & Lang Zhang & Zhenglin Sun, 2020. "Transportation Carbon Emissions from a Perspective of Sustainable Development in Major Cities of Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Li Dai & Yufang Zhang & Lei Wang & Shuanli Zheng & Wenqiang Xu, 2021. "Assessment of Carbon Density in Natural Mountain Forest Ecosystems at Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Chen, Qianqian & Gu, Yu & Tang, Zhiyong & Wei, Wei & Sun, Yuhan, 2018. "Assessment of low-carbon iron and steel production with CO2 recycling and utilization technologies: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 192-207.
    11. Huang, Jian-Bai & Luo, Yu-Mei & Feng, Chao, 2019. "An overview of carbon dioxide emissions from China's ferrous metal industry: 1991-2030," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 541-549.
    12. Zhang, Xi & Geng, Yong & Shao, Shuai & Dong, Huijuan & Wu, Rui & Yao, Tianli & Song, Jiekun, 2020. "How to achieve China’s CO2 emission reduction targets by provincial efforts? – An analysis based on generalized Divisia index and dynamic scenario simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Xiaolei, 2015. "Carbon emissions from energy intensive industry in China: Evidence from the iron & steel industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 746-754.
    14. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Decomposing the change in energy consumption in China's nonferrous metal industry: An empirical analysis based on the LMDI method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2652-2663.
    15. Nadiia Charkovska & Mariia Halushchak & Rostyslav Bun & Zbigniew Nahorski & Tomohiro Oda & Matthias Jonas & Petro Topylko, 2019. "A high-definition spatially explicit modelling approach for national greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes: reducing the errors and uncertainties in global emission modelling," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 907-939, August.
    16. Shouhao Li & Weiquan Cheng & Jingjing Li & Hao Shen, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility Development and Climate Change: Regional Evidence of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Wang, Xiaozhong & Liu, Bin & Wu, Gang & Sun, Yixiang & Guo, Xisheng & Jin, Zhenghui & Xu, Weining & Zhao, Yongzhi & Zhang, Fusuo & Zou, Chunqin & Chen, Xinping, 2018. "Environmental costs and mitigation potential in plastic-greenhouse pepper production system in China: A life cycle assessment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 186-194.
    18. Liu, Zhe & Adams, Michelle & Cote, Raymond P. & Geng, Yong & Chen, Qinghua & Liu, Weili & Sun, Lu & Yu, Xiaoman, 2017. "Comprehensive development of industrial symbiosis for the response of greenhouse gases emission mitigation: Challenges and opportunities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 88-95.
    19. Sumabat, Ana Karmela & Lopez, Neil Stephen & Yu, Krista Danielle & Hao, Han & Li, Richard & Geng, Yong & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2016. "Decomposition analysis of Philippine CO2 emissions from fuel combustion and electricity generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 795-804.
    20. Guo, Bin & Geng, Yong & Franke, Bernd & Hao, Han & Liu, Yaxuan & Chiu, Anthony, 2014. "Uncovering China’s transport CO2 emission patterns at the regional level," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 134-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s11027-017-9753-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.