IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v34y2023i5d10.1007_s10845-022-01941-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital twin-based decision making paradigm of raise boring method

Author

Listed:
  • Fuwen Hu

    (North China University of Technology)

  • Xianjin Qiu

    (North China University of Technology)

  • Guoye Jing

    (China Coal Research Institute)

  • Jian Tang

    (Quzhou University)

  • Yuanzhi Zhu

    (North China University of Technology)

Abstract

Raise boring is an important method to construct underground shafts of mines and other underground infrastructures by drilling down the pilot hole and then reaming up to the desired diameter. As a typical cyber-physical system, the raise boring construction project is full of high heterogeneity, complexity and intrinsic uncertainty. Currently, its decision making loop is mainly based on the document-based system engineering and expertise experience. Regarding the intrinsic invisibility and uncertain risks in the underground engineering, especially for the remotely underground constructions on the extraterrestrial planets, it is absolutely required to shift the document-based and experience-dependent decision making paradigm into a digital and smart way. To this end, a systematic framework of the digital twin-driven process planning system for the raise boring method was conceived and presented. Then following the principles of open architecture, modularization and extensibility, a five-dimension architecture of digital twinning was built comprehensively that contained physical entity, digital representation, service entity, cross-systems entity and connection entity. Furthermore, a digital twin-driven decision making prototype system for the raise boring process was developed by the hybrid modeling of data-based model, visual geometric models, domain knowledge-based model and physics-based model. System verification indicated that the presented system had great potentials to facilitate the already very complicated process planning via the planning recommendation, visual simulation and models fusion. Finally, the contributions, novelty and limitations of this endeavour to extend the current digital twin practice were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuwen Hu & Xianjin Qiu & Guoye Jing & Jian Tang & Yuanzhi Zhu, 2023. "Digital twin-based decision making paradigm of raise boring method," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 2387-2405, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-022-01941-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-01941-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-022-01941-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-022-01941-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendrik Yan Hong Lim & Pai Zheng & Chun-Hsien Chen, 2020. "A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 1313-1337, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    2. Remigiusz Iwańkowicz & Radosław Rutkowski, 2023. "Digital Twin of Shipbuilding Process in Shipyard 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Saporiti, Nicolò & Cannas, Violetta Giada & Pozzi, Rossella & Rossi, Tommaso, 2023. "Challenges and countermeasures for digital twin implementation in manufacturing plants: A Delphi study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    4. Fromhold-Eisebith, Martina & Marschall, Philip & Peters, Robert & Thomes, Paul, 2021. "Torn between digitized future and context dependent past – How implementing ‘Industry 4.0’ production technologies could transform the German textile industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Angelo Corallo & Vito Del Vecchio & Marianna Lezzi & Paola Morciano, 2021. "Shop Floor Digital Twin in Smart Manufacturing: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Weifei Hu & Jinyi Shao & Qing Jiao & Chuxuan Wang & Jin Cheng & Zhenyu Liu & Jianrong Tan, 2023. "A new differentiable architecture search method for optimizing convolutional neural networks in the digital twin of intelligent robotic grasping," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 2943-2961, October.
    7. Rong Xie & Muyan Chen & Weihuang Liu & Hongfei Jian & Yanjun Shi, 2021. "Digital Twin Technologies for Turbomachinery in a Life Cycle Perspective: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Paula Morella & María Pilar Lambán & Jesús Royo & Juan Carlos Sánchez & Jaime Latapia, 2023. "Technologies Associated with Industry 4.0 in Green Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    9. Lim, Kendrik Yan Hong & Dang, Le Van & Chen, Chun-Hsien, 2024. "Incorporating supply and production digital twins to mitigate demand disruptions in multi-echelon networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    10. Fabrizio Banfi & Raffaella Brumana & Graziano Salvalai & Mattia Previtali, 2022. "Digital Twin and Cloud BIM-XR Platform Development: From Scan-to-BIM-to-DT Process to a 4D Multi-User Live App to Improve Building Comfort, Efficiency and Costs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Gurtej Singh Saini & AmirHossein Fallah & Pradeepkumar Ashok & Eric van Oort, 2022. "Digital Twins for Real-Time Scenario Analysis during Well Construction Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Lan, Lan & Zhou, Zhifang, 2024. "Complementary or substitutive effects? The duality of digitalization and ESG on firm's innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Elisa Negri & Vibhor Pandhare & Laura Cattaneo & Jaskaran Singh & Marco Macchi & Jay Lee, 2021. "Field-synchronized Digital Twin framework for production scheduling with uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1207-1228, April.
    14. Leung, Eric K.H. & Lee, Carmen Kar Hang & Ouyang, Zhiyuan, 2022. "From traditional warehouses to Physical Internet hubs: A digital twin-based inbound synchronization framework for PI-order management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    15. SungKu Kang & Ran Jin & Xinwei Deng & Ron S. Kenett, 2023. "Challenges of modeling and analysis in cybermanufacturing: a review from a machine learning and computation perspective," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 415-428, February.
    16. Madalina CUC, 2021. "Improving The Decision-Making Process By Modeling Digital Twins In A Big Data Environment," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 138-154, May.
    17. Georgios Falekas & Athanasios Karlis, 2021. "Digital Twin in Electrical Machine Control and Predictive Maintenance: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    18. Yujie Ma & Xueer Chen & Shuang Ma, 2024. "Optimal Sustainable Manufacturing for Product Family Architecture in Intelligent Manufacturing: A Hierarchical Joint Optimization Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-28, March.
    19. Mohammed M. Mabkhot & Pedro Ferreira & Antonio Maffei & Primož Podržaj & Maksymilian Mądziel & Dario Antonelli & Michele Lanzetta & Jose Barata & Eleonora Boffa & Miha Finžgar & Łukasz Paśko & Paolo M, 2021. "Mapping Industry 4.0 Enabling Technologies into United Nations Sustainability Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-33, February.
    20. Maksim Dli & Andrei Puchkov & Valery Meshalkin & Ildar Abdeev & Rail Saitov & Rinat Abdeev, 2020. "Energy and Resource Efficiency in Apatite-Nepheline Ore Waste Processing Using the Digital Twin Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-022-01941-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.