IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v28y2017i3d10.1007_s10845-014-1010-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian equilibria for uncertain bimatrix game with asymmetric information

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangfeng Yang

    (Renmin University of China
    Tsinghua University)

  • Jinwu Gao

    (Renmin University of China)

Abstract

In an uncertain bimatrix game, there are two solution concepts of $$(\alpha ,\beta )$$ ( α , β ) -optimistic equilibrium strategy and $$(u,v)$$ ( u , v ) -maximum chance equilibrium strategy. This paper goes further by assuming that the confidence levels $$\alpha , \beta $$ α , β and payoff levels $$u, v$$ u , v are private information. Then, the so-called uncertain bimatrix game with asymmetric information is investigated. Two solution concepts of Bayesian optimistic equilibrium strategy and Bayesian maximum chance equilibrium strategy as well as their existence theorems are presented. Moreover, sufficient and necessary conditions are given for finding the Bayesian equilibrium strategies. Finally, a two-firm advertising problem is analyzed for illustrating our modelling idea.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangfeng Yang & Jinwu Gao, 2017. "Bayesian equilibria for uncertain bimatrix game with asymmetric information," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 515-525, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-014-1010-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-1010-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-014-1010-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-014-1010-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger A. Blau, 1974. "Random-Payoff Two-Person Zero-Sum Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1243-1251, December.
    2. John C. Harsanyi, 1967. "Games with Incomplete Information Played by "Bayesian" Players, I-III Part I. The Basic Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 159-182, November.
    3. R. G. Cassidy & C. A. Field & M. J. L. Kirby, 1972. "Solution of a Satisficing Model for Random Payoff Games," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 266-271, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boyang Dai & Xiangfeng Yang & Xiaoyue Liu, 2022. "Shapley Value of Uncertain Coalitional Game based on Hurwicz Criterion with Application to Water Resource Allocation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 241-260, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Singh, Vikas Vikram & Lisser, Abdel & Arora, Monika, 2021. "An equivalent mathematical program for games with random constraints," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Chunsheng Cui & Zhongwei Feng & Chunqiao Tan, 2018. "Credibilistic Loss Aversion Nash Equilibrium for Bimatrix Games with Triangular Fuzzy Payoffs," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-16, December.
    3. Rossana Riccardi & Giorgia Oggioni & Elisabetta Allevi & Abdel Lisser, 2023. "Complementarity formulation of games with random payoffs," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, December.
    4. Singh, Vikas Vikram & Lisser, Abdel, 2019. "A second-order cone programming formulation for two player zero-sum games with chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 839-845.
    5. Shen Peng & Navnit Yadav & Abdel Lisser & Vikas Vikram Singh, 2021. "Chance-constrained games with mixture distributions," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(1), pages 71-97, August.
    6. Cheng, Jianqiang & Leung, Janny & Lisser, Abdel, 2016. "Random-payoff two-person zero-sum game with joint chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 213-219.
    7. Martin Meier & Burkhard Schipper, 2014. "Bayesian games with unawareness and unawareness perfection," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(2), pages 219-249, June.
    8. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2004. "Configuration of Detection Software: A Comparison of Decision and Game Theory Approaches," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 131-148, September.
    9. Strzalecki, Tomasz, 2014. "Depth of reasoning and higher order beliefs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 108-122.
    10. Yoo, Seung Han, 2014. "Learning a population distribution," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 188-201.
    11. Olivier Coibion & Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Saten Kumar & Jane Ryngaert, 2021. "Do You Know that I Know that You Know…? Higher-Order Beliefs in Survey Data," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(3), pages 1387-1446.
    12. Hausken, Kjell & Levitin, Gregory, 2009. "Minmax defense strategy for complex multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 577-587.
    13. Yehuda Levy, 2013. "A Cantor Set of Games with No Shift-Homogeneous Equilibrium Selection," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 492-503, August.
    14. Amanda Friedenberg & H. Jerome Keisler, 2021. "Iterated dominance revisited," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 377-421, September.
    15. Pintér, Miklós & Udvari, Zsolt, 2011. "Generalized type spaces," MPRA Paper 34107, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Arun G. Chandrasekhar & Robert Townsend & Juan Pablo Xandri, 2018. "Financial Centrality and Liquidity Provision," NBER Working Papers 24406, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    18. Michael Müller, 2024. "Belief-independence and (robust) strategy-proofness," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 443-461, May.
    19. Sundström, David, 2016. "On Specification and Inference in the Econometrics of Public Procurement," Umeå Economic Studies 931, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    20. Scandizzo, Pasquale L. & Ventura, Marco, 2010. "Sharing risk through concession contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 363-370, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:28:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-014-1010-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.