IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jogath/v49y2020i4d10.1007_s00182-020-00722-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can players avoid the tragedy of the commons in a joint debt game?

Author

Listed:
  • Hiromasa Takahashi

    (Hiroshima City University)

  • Toru Takemoto

    (Nihon University)

  • Akihiro Suzuki

    (Yamagata University)

Abstract

Joint debts are debts that more than one debtor guarantees mutually. They are sometimes interpreted as a version of the tragedy of the commons. However, a simple model of the dynamic tragedy of the commons fails to capture an important feature of joint debts. The authors model joint debts as a joint borrowing limit game and compare the model with the dynamic tragedy of the commons model. Thereby, the authors show the difference in the achievability of efficiency between these two models and present the conditions for efficiency. The conditions for efficiency are as follows: (i) a not too large economic disparity between the players; (ii) not too many players. The joint borrowing limit game has a broad range of applications because the model can be applied to a case where creditors and debtors expect a debt guarantee of someone unilaterally even without an explicit contract of joint debt. For example, this model can be applied to the Eurosystem that led to Greek overborrowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiromasa Takahashi & Toru Takemoto & Akihiro Suzuki, 2020. "Can players avoid the tragedy of the commons in a joint debt game?," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(4), pages 975-1002, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jogath:v:49:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00182-020-00722-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00182-020-00722-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00182-020-00722-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00182-020-00722-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nassiry, Darius, 2018. "Green Bond Experience in the Nordic Countries," ADBI Working Papers 816, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    2. Paul De Grauwe, 2014. "The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Exchange Rates and Global Financial Policies, chapter 12, pages 297-320, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Paul De Grauwe, 2012. "A Fragile Eurozone in Search of a Better Governance," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 1-30.
    4. Sundaram, Rangarajan K., 1989. "Perfect equilibrium in non-randomized strategies in a class of symmetric dynamic games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 153-177, February.
    5. David Levhari & Leonard J. Mirman, 1980. "The Great Fish War: An Example Using a Dynamic Cournot-Nash Solution," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 11(1), pages 322-334, Spring.
    6. Hansen, Lars Peter & Singleton, Kenneth J, 1982. "Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(5), pages 1269-1286, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Mathieu & Henri Sterdyniak, 2012. "Faut-il des règles de politique budgétaire ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(7), pages 299-346.
    2. Christophe Blot & Jérôme Creel & Paul Hubert & Fabien Labondance, 2015. "The QE experience : Worth a try ?," Post-Print hal-03459951, HAL.
    3. Catherine Mathieu & Henri Sterdyniak, 2014. "Redemption?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 51-91.
    4. Alexandra Ferreira-Lopes & Tiago Neves Sequeira, 2012. "Business Cycles Association in a Small Monetary Union: The Case of Switzerland," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 9-30, March.
    5. Bartzokas, Anthony & Giacon, Renato & Macchiarelli, Corrado, 2022. "Exogenous shocks and proactive resilience in the EU," MERIT Working Papers 2022-025, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Antoniadou, Elena & Koulovatianos, Christos & Mirman, Leonard J., 2013. "Strategic exploitation of a common-property resource under uncertainty," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 28-39.
    7. Andrea Bonilla‐Bolaños, 2021. "A step further in the theory of regional integration: A look at the South American integration strategy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 845-873, July.
    8. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/eo6779thqgm5r489maqa474kg is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Giovanni Dosi & Marcello Minenna & Andrea Roventini & Roberto Violi, 2021. "Making the Eurozone work: a risk-sharing reform of the European Stability Mechanism," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 617-657, April.
    10. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:1-10 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Christophe Blot & Jérôme Creel & Paul Hubert & Fabien Labondance, 2014. "Les enjeux du triple mandat de la BCE," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(3), pages 175-186.
    12. Deborah Mabbett & Waltraud Schelkle, 2014. "Searching under the lamp-post: the evolution of fiscal surveillance," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 5, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    13. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/7gjmt2p0l896bo3oar8rqd4vvr is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mariam Camarero & Josep Lluís Carrion‐i‐Silvestre & Cecilio Tamarit, 2021. "External imbalances from a GVAR perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(11), pages 3202-3245, November.
    15. Bethmann, Dirk, 2008. "The open-loop solution of the Uzawa-Lucas model of endogenous growth with N agents," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 396-414, March.
    16. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/eo6779thqgm5r489m6u1i2a0o is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Carnazza, Giovanni & Liberati, Paolo, 2021. "The asymmetric impact of the pandemic crisis on interest rates on public debt in the Eurozone," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 521-542.
    18. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7gjmt2p0l896bo3oar8rqd4vvr is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Saungweme, Talknice & Odhiambo, Nicholas M, 2019. "Relative impact of domestic and foreign public debt on economic growth in South Africa," Working Papers 25664, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    20. Tapan Mitra & Gerhard Sorger, 2015. "Noncooperative Resource Exploitation by Patient Players," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 361-377, September.
    21. Collignon, Stefan & Esposito, Piero, 2021. "Macroeconomic imbalances in Europe: How to overcome the fallacy of unit labour costs," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 673-691.
    22. Singh, Manish K. & Gómez-Puig, Marta & Sosvilla-Rivero, Simón, 2021. "Quantifying sovereign risk in the euro area," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 76-96.
    23. Kapeller, Jakob & Gräbner, Claudius & Heimberger, Philipp, 2019. "Economic polarisation in Europe: Causes and policy options," ifso working paper series 5, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    24. Christophe Blot & Jérôme Creel & Paul Hubert & Fabien Labondance, 2014. "Dealing with the ECB's triple mandate?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01072114, HAL.
    25. Terzi, Alessio, 2020. "Macroeconomic adjustment in the euro area," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jogath:v:49:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s00182-020-00722-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.