IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v23y2022i7d10.1007_s10902-022-00551-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Well-being Monism Defended

Author

Listed:
  • Emelia Miller

    (University of Massachusetts, Amherst, (Department of Philosophy))

Abstract

In “Well-Being and Pluralism” (2021), Polly Mitchell and Anna Alexandrova defend conceptual pluralism about well-being. Conceptual pluralism about well-being holds that there are multiple, irreducible concepts of well-being that are employed in different contexts, all equally legitimate as concepts of well-being. Moreover, "Conceptual pluralism about well-being entails that there is no single essence which characterises all and only instances of well-being” (Mitchell and Alexandrova in J Happiness Stud 22:2411–2433, 2021). Conceptual monism about well-being, on the other hand, holds, at a minimum, that there is some essence that unites all legitimate uses of 'well-being'. In this paper, I will argue that there is a version of conceptual monism about well-being, the network theory of well-being defended by Michael Bishop in his book The Good Life (2015), that can secure all of the benefits of Mitchell and Alexandrova's conceptual pluralism, namely accommodating the wide range of uses of “well-being” in the sciences of well-being and in ordinary language. Mitchell and Alexandrova’s argument for pluralism depends on the inability of a monistic theory of well-being to account for this diversity of conceptions of well-being and the diversity of instruments used to measure well-being in the sciences. Bishop’s network theory, like Mitchell and Alexandrova’s pluralism, is designed to accommodate the scientific study of well-being. Because of this, it avoids the pitfalls of traditional, monistic conceptions of well-being despite its monistic credentials. I conclude with two novel arguments for the network theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Emelia Miller, 2022. "Well-being Monism Defended," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3407-3427, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:23:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10902-022-00551-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-022-00551-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-022-00551-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-022-00551-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judge, Timothy A. & Higgins, Chad A., 1998. "Affective Disposition and the Letter of Reference," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 207-221, September.
    2. Josep M. Antó & José Luis Martí & Jaume Casals & Paul Bou-Habib & Paula Casal & Marc Fleurbaey & Howard Frumkin & Manel Jiménez-Morales & Jacint Jordana & Carla Lancelotti & Humberto Llavador & Lela M, 2021. "The Planetary Wellbeing Initiative: Pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Polly Mitchell & Anna Alexandrova, 2021. "Well-Being and Pluralism," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2411-2433, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madera, Juan M. & Spitzmueller, Christiane & Yu, Heyao & Edema-Sillo, Ebenezer & Clarke, Mark S.F., 2024. "External review letters in academic promotion and tenure decisions are reflective of reviewer characteristics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    2. Gaea Morales & Erin Bromaghim & Angela Kim & Caroline Diamond & Alejo Maggini & Avery Everhart & Sofia Gruskin & Anthony Tirado Chase, 2021. "Classroom Walls and City Hall: Mobilizing Local Partnerships to Advance the Sustainable Development Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Huizhao Yang & Sailesh Ranjitkar & Wenxuan Xu & Lei Han & Jianbo Yang & Liqing Wu & Jianchu Xu, 2021. "Crop-climate model in support of adjusting local ecological calendar in the Taxkorgan, eastern Pamir Plateau," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Muhammad Asaduzzaman & Rifat Ara & Sadia Afrin & James E. Meiring & K. M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, 2022. "Planetary Health Education and Capacity Building for Healthcare Professionals in a Global Context: Current Opportunities, Gaps and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Remco Kort & Jeremy Pivor & Josep M. Antó & Annemarie Bergsma & Peter J. Blankestijn & Olette Bollen & Egid van Bree & Joyce L. Browne & Judith de Bruin & Jasper Buikx & Chiara Cadeddu & Jennifer Cole, 2023. "Outcomes from the First European Planetary Health Hub Convening at ARTIS in Amsterdam," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Mark Fabian & Anna Alexandrova & Yamini Cinamon Nair, 2023. "Coproducing Wellbeing Policy: A Theory of Thriving in Financial Hardship," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2309-2330, October.
    7. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Oliva M. D. Martins & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniş & Cătălin Gheorghiță & Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Enhances Sustainable Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    8. James L. D. Brown & Sophie Potter, 2024. "Integrating the Philosophy and Psychology of Well-Being: An Opinionated Overview," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Lowri Wilkie & Zoe Fisher & Andrew H. Kemp, 2022. "The ‘Rippling’ Waves of Wellbeing: A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Surf-Therapy Intervention on Patients with Acquired Brain Injury," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-25, August.
    10. Takeshi Kato, 2023. "Well-being policy evaluation methodology based on WE pluralism," Papers 2305.04500, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:23:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s10902-022-00551-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.