IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jhappi/v21y2020i3d10.1007_s10902-019-00107-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Associations of Different Social Needs with Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being: An Empirical Investigation Based on Social Production Function Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nardi Steverink

    (University of Groningen
    University of Groningen)

  • Siegwart Lindenberg

    (University of Groningen
    Tilburg University)

  • Tali Spiegel

    (Utrecht University)

  • Anna P. Nieboer

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam)

Abstract

The fulfilment of social needs is essential for human beings to function well and thrive, but little is known about how social needs are differentially associated with types of well-functioning. This study investigates how the three social needs as proposed by Social Production Function theory—the needs for affection, behavioral confirmation, and status—relate to psychological strengths (self-evaluation, hope, and self-regulatory ability), loneliness, and subjective well-being (life satisfaction, positive and negative affect). Moreover, possible mechanisms are explored. Using the first release sample of the LifeLines study (N = 13,301) and four other samples (N = 1094, N = 456, N = 415, and N = 142), we found that the three social needs yielded a robust factor structure, and related differentially to gender and education. Their associations with all three psychological strengths were substantial. Affection need fulfilment related most strongly to both emotional and social loneliness, but the expected stronger association of behavioral confirmation with social loneliness was not found. As expected, affection related most strongly to life satisfaction and least strongly to positive affect, whereas status related most strongly to positive affect and least strongly to life satisfaction. Of all social needs, behavioral confirmation had comparatively the strongest negative association with negative affect. With regard to mechanisms, affection was found to have a partial indirect effect on life satisfaction via self-evaluation, hope, and self-regulatory ability, while status had a modest indirect effect via self-regulatory ability on positive affect. It is concluded that different need fulfillments make unique contributions to different types of well-functioning, implying that a mix of social need satisfiers (i.e. different kinds of social relationships and other social provisions) are needed for individuals to function well. This knowledge may support interventions and policy directed at both individual and societal well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Nardi Steverink & Siegwart Lindenberg & Tali Spiegel & Anna P. Nieboer, 2020. "The Associations of Different Social Needs with Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being: An Empirical Investigation Based on Social Production Function Theory," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 799-824, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10902-019-00107-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10902-019-00107-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10902-019-00107-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10902-019-00107-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holger Steinmetz & Peter Schmidt & Andrea Tina-Booh & Siegrid Wieczorek & Shalom Schwartz, 2009. "Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 599-616, July.
    2. Aqeel Khan, 2013. "Predictors of Positive Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being Among North Indian Adolescents: Role of Mentoring and Educational Encouragement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 1285-1293, December.
    3. Anna Nieboer & Siegwart Lindenberg & Anne Boomsma & Alinda Bruggen, 2005. "Dimensions Of Well-Being And Their Measurement: The Spf-Il Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 313-353, September.
    4. Melikşah Demir & Metin Özdemir, 2010. "Friendship, Need Satisfaction and Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 243-259, April.
    5. Nieboer, Anna P. & Cramm, Jane M., 2018. "How do older people achieve well-being? Validation of the Social Production Function Instrument for the level of well-being–short (SPF-ILs)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 304-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifat Rom & Ido Morag & Yuval Palgi & Michal Isaacson, 2024. "The Architectural Layout of Long-Term Care Units: Relationships between Support for Residents’ Well-Being and for Caregivers’ Burnout and Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Jelle J. Sijtsema & Marcel Zeelenberg & Siegwart M. Lindenberg, 2022. "Regret, Self-regulatory Abilities, and Well-Being: Their Intricate Relationships," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1189-1214, March.
    3. Vandepitte Sophie & Claes Sara & T’Jaeckx Jellen & Annemans Lieven, 2022. "The Role of ‘Peace of Mind’ and ‘Meaningfulness’ as Psychological Concepts in Explaining Subjective Well-being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3331-3346, October.
    4. Pankaj Tiwari, 2022. "Bank affection and customer retention: an empirical investigation of customer trust, satisfaction, loyalty," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(6), pages 1-27, June.
    5. Anna P. Nieboer & Chantie C. Luijten & Jane M. Cramm, 2024. "Measuring the Realisation of Well-Being Needs of Adolescents: Validation of the Social Production Function Instrument for the Level of Well-Being–Short (SPF-ILs)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 151-170, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna P. Nieboer & Chantie C. Luijten & Jane M. Cramm, 2024. "Measuring the Realisation of Well-Being Needs of Adolescents: Validation of the Social Production Function Instrument for the Level of Well-Being–Short (SPF-ILs)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 151-170, October.
    2. Lotte Vestjens & Jane Murray Cramm & Anna Petra Nieboer, 2021. "A cross-sectional study investigating the relationships between self-management abilities, productive patient-professional interactions, and well-being of community-dwelling frail older people," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 427-437, September.
    3. Yifat Rom & Ido Morag & Yuval Palgi & Michal Isaacson, 2024. "The Architectural Layout of Long-Term Care Units: Relationships between Support for Residents’ Well-Being and for Caregivers’ Burnout and Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Zhenzhen Qin & Yao Song, 2020. "The Sacred Power of Beauty: Examining the Perceptual Effect of Buddhist Symbols on Happiness and Life Satisfaction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Rosemary Hiscock & Pierpaolo Mudu & Matthias Braubach & Marco Martuzzi & Laura Perez & Clive Sabel, 2014. "Wellbeing Impacts of City Policies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-34, November.
    6. Holger Lengfeld & Jessica Ordemann, 2016. "The long shadow of occupation: Volunteering in retirement," Rationality and Society, , vol. 28(1), pages 3-23, February.
    7. Mukti Clarence & Viju P. D. & Lalatendu Kesari Jena & Tony Sam George, 2021. "Predictors of Positive Psychological Capital: An Attempt Among the Teacher Communities in Rural Jharkhand, India," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(2), pages 139-160, May.
    8. Seung Pil Lee, 2020. "Sustainable Reciprocity Mechanism of Social Initiatives in Sport: The Mediating Effect of Gratitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Nieboer, Anna P. & Cramm, Jane M., 2018. "How do older people achieve well-being? Validation of the Social Production Function Instrument for the level of well-being–short (SPF-ILs)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 304-313.
    10. Sanne J. Kuipers & Anna P. Nieboer & Jane M. Cramm, 2020. "The Need for Co-Creation of Care with Multi-Morbidity Patients—A Longitudinal Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-11, May.
    11. Daye Son & Laura M. Padilla-Walker, 2020. "Happy Helpers: A Multidimensional and Mixed-Method Approach to Prosocial Behavior and Its Effects on Friendship Quality, Mental Health, and Well-Being During Adolescence," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1705-1723, June.
    12. Jihye Kim & Minseong Kim, 2022. "Rise of Social Media Influencers as a New Marketing Channel: Focusing on the Roles of Psychological Well-Being and Perceived Social Responsibility among Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Nieboer, Anna P. & Koolman, Xander & Stolk, Elly A., 2010. "Preferences for long-term care services: Willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1317-1325, May.
    14. André Pirralha & Wiebke Weber, 2020. "Correction for measurement error in invariance testing: An illustration using SQP," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Yaël Drunen & Bram Spruyt & Filip Droogenbroeck, 2021. "The Salience of Perceived Societal Conflict in Europe: A 27 Country Study on the Development of a Measure for Generalized Conflict Thinking," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 595-635, December.
    16. Veljko Jovanović, 2019. "Evaluation of Domain Satisfaction Measure in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Austria and Four Countries of the Former Yugoslavia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1369-1385, February.
    17. Yue, Yafei & Yang, Dongfeng & Owen, Neville & Van Dyck, Delfien, 2022. "The built environment and mental health among older adults in Dalian: The mediating role of perceived environmental attributes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    18. Peter Meer, 2014. "Gender, Unemployment and Subjective Well-Being: Why Being Unemployed Is Worse for Men than for Women," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 23-44, January.
    19. Aqeel Khan & Mustapha Alhaji Grema & Adibah Binti Abdul Latif & Herwina Bahar & Iswan Iswan & Sriyanto S & Diana Lea Baranovich & Azlina Binti Mohd Kosnin & Arieff Salleh Rosman & Mahani Mokhtar & Zai, 2020. "Mediating Effect of Positive Psychological Strength and Study Skills on Examination Anxiety among Nigerian College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Elena del Barrio & Sandra Pinzón & Sara Marsillas & Francisco Garrido, 2021. "Physical Environment vs. Social Environment: What Factors of Age-Friendliness Predict Subjective Well-Being in Men and Women?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jhappi:v:21:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10902-019-00107-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.