IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v13y2023i1d10.1007_s13412-022-00795-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservation awareness through social media

Author

Listed:
  • Heather A. Fischer

    (Oregon State University)

  • Miranda L. Bernard

    (Duke University)

  • Krista Kemppinen

    (Arizona State University)

  • Leah R. Gerber

    (Arizona State University)

Abstract

While many conservation scientists trace their interest in the subject to experiences with nature, today social media is a powerful tool to reach younger generations. In this study, we sought to understand the role of social media in Generation Z’s awareness of conservation issues and if social media spurs any pro-environmental behavior change related to conservation amongst Generation Z. We surveyed students at Arizona State University to better understand how they become aware of conservation issues. Findings indicate that while students became aware of conservation issues in many ways, online sources—especially social media and online news sources—are prominent for many. Our results suggest the strong potential of social media for communicating science and conservation issues to young people. We encourage scientists to leverage social media to engage young people because it is a straightforward and high-impact avenue for science communication and public engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather A. Fischer & Miranda L. Bernard & Krista Kemppinen & Leah R. Gerber, 2023. "Conservation awareness through social media," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 23-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00795-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-022-00795-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-022-00795-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-022-00795-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emily L Howell & Julia Nepper & Dominique Brossard & Michael A Xenos & Dietram A Scheufele, 2019. "Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Oswald Devisch & Daniel Veestraeten, 2013. "From Sharing to Experimenting: How Mobile Technologies Are Helping Ordinary Citizens Regain Their Positions as Scientists," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 63-76, April.
    3. D. Shiffman, 2012. "Twitter as a tool for conservation education and outreach: what scientific conferences can do to promote live-tweeting," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(3), pages 257-262, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annika Miller & Stefan Heiland, 2021. "#ProtectNature—How Characteristics of Nature Conservation Posts Impact User Engagement on Facebook and Twitter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Jenni Partanen, 2016. "Liquid planning, wiki-design—Learning from the Case Pispala," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 997-1018, November.
    3. E. Parsons, 2015. "So you think you want to run an environmental conservation meeting? Advice on the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune that accompany academic conference planning," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 5(4), pages 735-744, December.
    4. João Carlos Nabout & Fabrício Barreto Teresa & Karine Borges Machado & Vitor Hugo Mendonça Prado & Luis Mauricio Bini & José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho, 2018. "Do traditional scientometric indicators predict social media activity on scientific knowledge? An analysis of the ecological literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 1007-1015, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:13:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00795-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.