IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jenvss/v12y2022i3d10.1007_s13412-022-00758-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three crucial considerations when presenting alternative paradigms in sustainability research

Author

Listed:
  • Chad S. Boda

    (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

  • David Harnesk

    (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

Abstract

Sustainability science (SS) is diverse field of problem-driven and solution-oriented research that is still developing. The further maturation of the field relies on its practitioners formulating alternative paradigms to use-inspired knowledge production to facilitate comparison and reasoned judgment on what constitutes scientific best practices. In this short article, we flag several blind spots that can arise in attempts to articulate potential paradigms in SS. We identify and discuss three crucial components that should be included when constructing and presenting potential paradigms in the field, namely the necessity of 1) comparing suggested alternatives with available competitors, 2) preserving scientific integrity in scientific knowledge production, and 3) clarifying the particular contribution of scientific knowledge to social change. Keeping sight of these three important issues will allow the still developing field of SS to mature in a way that builds on scientific comparison and reasoned judgment among the field’s practitioners, with implications for advancing its research agenda. The issues we outline here should not only concern authors, but reviewers and editors of SS journals as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad S. Boda & David Harnesk, 2022. "Three crucial considerations when presenting alternative paradigms in sustainability research," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(3), pages 652-656, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00758-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s13412-022-00758-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-022-00758-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13412-022-00758-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chad S. Boda & Turaj Faran, 2018. "Paradigm Found? Immanent Critique to Tackle Interdisciplinarity and Normativity in Science for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Guido Caniglia & C. Luederitz & T. Wirth & I. Fazey & B. Martín-López & K. Hondrila & A. König & H. Wehrden & N. A. Schäpke & M. D. Laubichler & D. J. Lang, 2021. "A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 93-100, February.
    3. Chad Stephen Boda & Anne Jerneck, 2019. "Enabling local adaptation to climate change: towards collective action in Flagler Beach, Florida, USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 631-649, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Jan Činčera & Grzegorz Mikusiński & Bohuslav Binka & Luis Calafate & Cristina Calheiros & Alexandra Cardoso & Marcus Hedblom & Michael Jones & Alex Koutsouris & Clara Vasconcelos & Katarzyna Iwińska, 2019. "Managing Diversity: The Challenges of Inter-University Cooperation in Sustainability Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Héloïse Berkowitz & Sanne Bor, 2024. "Meta-organizations for sustainability transformations: Navigating tensions between imperatives of transition and meta-organizationality," Post-Print hal-04493940, HAL.
    4. Joost Moor, 2022. "Prioritizing adaptation and mitigation in the climate movement: evidence from a cross-national protest survey of the Global Climate Strike, 2019," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Núñez, Angie Paola Bernal & Gutiérrez-Montes, Isabel & Hernández-Núñez, Héctor Eduardo & Suárez, David Ricardo Gutiérrez & García, Gustavo Adolfo Gutiérrez & Suárez, Juan Carlos & Casanoves, Fernando , 2023. "Diverse farmer livelihoods increase resilience to climate variability in southern Colombia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Michael Benson & Chad Boda & Runa R. Das & Leslie King & Chad Park, 2022. "Sustainable Development and Canada’s Transitioning Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Oscar Svensson & Jamil Khan & Roger Hildingsson, 2020. "Studying Industrial Decarbonisation: Developing an Interdisciplinary Understanding of the Conditions for Transformation in Energy-Intensive Natural Resource-Based Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Arnott, James C., 2021. "Pens and purse strings: Exploring the opportunities and limits to funding actionable sustainability science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    9. David O’Byrne & Altaaf Mechiche-Alami & Anna Tengberg & Lennart Olsson, 2022. "The Social Impacts of Sustainable Land Management in Great Green Wall Countries: An Evaluative Framework Based on the Capability Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Héloïse Berkowitz, 2023. "From organizations as systems of ocean destruction to organizations as systems of ocean thriving," Post-Print hal-04005729, HAL.
    11. Qing (Ray) Cao & Andrew N. K. Chen & Bradley T. Ewing & Mark A. Thompson, 2021. "Evaluating Information System Success and Impact on Sustainability Practices: A Survey and a Case Study of Regional Mesonet Information Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    12. David O’Byrne, 2022. "Restoring human freedoms: from utilitarianism to a capability approach to wetland restoration in Louisiana’s coastal master plan," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(2), pages 298-310, June.
    13. Samuel Stephen Wakdok & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2021. "Climate Change, Security, and the Resource Nexus: Case Study of Northern Nigeria and Lake Chad," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Chad Stephen Boda & Anne Jerneck, 2019. "Enabling local adaptation to climate change: towards collective action in Flagler Beach, Florida, USA," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 631-649, December.
    15. Chad S. Boda, 2019. "The road traveled and pathways forward: A review of Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options by Mechler, R., Bouwer, L., Schinko, T., Surminski, S. & Linnerooth-Bayer,," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 293-297, October.
    16. Smith, Thomas S.J. & Baranowski, Mariusz & Schmid, Benedikt, 2021. "Intentional degrowth and its unintended consequences: Uneven journeys towards post-growth transformations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Phoebe Koundouri & Angelos Alamanos & Jeffrey D Sachs, 2024. "Innovating for Sustainability: The Global Climate Hub," DEOS Working Papers 2403, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    18. Chad S. Boda & Turaj Faran & Murray Scown & Kelly Dorkenoo & Brian C. Chaffin & Maryam Nastar & Emily Boyd, 2021. "Loss and damage from climate change and implicit assumptions of sustainable development," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-18, January.
    19. Masahiko Haraguchi & Akihiko Nishino & Akira Kodaka & Maura Allaire & Upmanu Lall & Liao Kuei-Hsien & Kaya Onda & Kota Tsubouchi & Naohiko Kohtake, 2022. "Human mobility data and analysis for urban resilience: A systematic review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1507-1535, June.
    20. Christopher Luederitz & Guido Caniglia & Barry Colbert & Sarah Burch, 2021. "How do small businesses pursue sustainability? The role of collective agency for integrating planned and emergent strategy making," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3376-3393, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s13412-022-00758-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.