IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecstr/v13y2024i1d10.1186_s40008-024-00330-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stone–Geary meets CES: the properties of an extended linear expenditure system

Author

Listed:
  • Ferran Sancho

    (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)

Abstract

The structure of demand plays a fundamental role in shaping economic equilibrium. In computable general equilibrium analysis, comparative statics allow us to simulate how policies or external adjustments impact the equilibrium state. The results of these simulations are significantly influenced by the nature of the adopted demand structure. Typically, homothetic demand structures are frequently used for simplicity in these equilibrium models, but they do not accurately capture demand behavior. In this text, we study the properties of a demand system that eliminates demand constraints often found in general equilibrium models. Specifically, we first explore the characteristics of a demand system that generalizes the standard Stone–Geary linear demand structure. Second, we illustrate its possibilities with an empirical application using available Spanish data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferran Sancho, 2024. "Stone–Geary meets CES: the properties of an extended linear expenditure system," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:13:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-024-00330-5
    DOI: 10.1186/s40008-024-00330-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40008-024-00330-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40008-024-00330-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mette Christensen, 2014. "Heterogeneity in Consumer Demands and the Income Effect: Evidence from Panel Data," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 116(2), pages 335-355, April.
    2. Whalley, John & Yeung, Bernard, 1984. "External sector closing rules in applied general equilibrium models," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 123-138, February.
    3. Deaton,Angus & Muellbauer,John, 1980. "Economics and Consumer Behavior," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521296762, January.
    4. Sébastien Lecocq & Jean-Marc Robin, 2006. "Estimating Demand Response with Panel Data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1043-1060, November.
    5. Ana-Isabel Guerra & Laura Varela-Candamio & Jesús López-Rodríguez, 2022. "Tax reforms in Spain: efficiency levels and distributional patterns," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 41-68, January.
    6. Shoven, John B & Whalley, John, 1984. "Applied General-Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 1007-1051, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferran Sancho, 2022. "Stone-Geary Meets CES: An Extended Linear Expenditure System," Working Papers 1328, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    3. repec:rre:publsh:v:34:y:2004:i:1:p:37-56 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Böhringer, Christoph & Rutherford, Thomas Fox & Wiegard, Wolfgang, 2003. "Computable general equilibrium analysis: Opening a black box," ZEW Discussion Papers 03-56, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Schmidt, Tobias F. N. & Koschel, Henrike, 1998. "Modelling of foreign trade in applied general equilibrium models: theoretical approaches and sensitivity analysis with the GEM-E3 model," ZEW Discussion Papers 98-08, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Ferreira FIlho, Joaquim Bento de Souza & Horridge, Mark, 2005. "The Doha Round, Poverty and Regional Inequality in Brazil," Conference papers 331332, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Núñez-Sánchez, Ramón & Otoya-Chavarría, Marco & Soberón, Alexandra, 2024. "Price and budget elasticities under utility poverty policies in Spain," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Adelman, Irma & Robinson, Sherman, 1986. "The Application of General Equilibrium Models to Analyze U.S. Agriculture," CUDARE Working Papers 198352, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Taniguchi, Kiyoshi, 2001. "A General Equilibrium Analysis Of Japanese Rice Market Trade Liberalization," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20660, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. James Alm & William H. Kaempfer, 2002. "Who Pays the Ticket Tax?," Public Finance Review, , vol. 30(1), pages 27-40, January.
    12. Barry J. Seldon & Roy G. Boyd, 1995. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of a Reduction in Capital Gains Taxes," Public Finance Review, , vol. 23(2), pages 193-216, April.
    13. Boadway, Robin, 1999. "Le rôle de la théorie de l’optimum du second rang en économie publique," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 75(1), pages 29-65, mars-juin.
    14. Hjertstrand, Per, 2020. "Income Elasticities Without Parameters," Working Paper Series 1324, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    15. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman, 1998. "Regional Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: A Survey and Critical Appraisal," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 21(3), pages 205-248, December.
    16. Bergman, Lars, 2005. "CGE Modeling of Environmental Policy and Resource Management," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 24, pages 1273-1306, Elsevier.
    17. van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2013. "Modeling the Global Economy – Forward-Looking Scenarios for Agriculture," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 933-994, Elsevier.
    18. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    19. Rajeev K. Goel & Shoji Haruna, 2021. "Unmasking the demand for masks: Analytics of mandating coronavirus masks," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 580-591, July.
    20. Lee, Jonq-Ying & Brown, Mark G. & Schwartz, Brooke, 1986. "The Demand For National Brand And Private Label Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice: A Switching Regression Analysis," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, July.
    21. Richard Chisik & Nazanin Behzadan & Harun Onder & Apurva Sanghi, 2016. "Aid, Remittances, the Dutch Disease, Refugees, and Kenya," Working Papers 062, Toronto Metropolitan University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Linear expenditure systems; Constant elasticity of substitution; Calibrated demand functions; Computable general equilibrium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:13:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-024-00330-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.