IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jecstr/v11y2022i1d10.1186_s40008-022-00266-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reswitching and capital models

Author

Listed:
  • Thijs ten Raa

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

Reswitching of techniques was shown to be possible in Leontief’s input–output model with flow and stock matrices. The finding is unearthed and related to the capital debate based on Sraffian models.

Suggested Citation

  • Thijs ten Raa, 2022. "Reswitching and capital models," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-5, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:11:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-022-00266-8
    DOI: 10.1186/s40008-022-00266-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40008-022-00266-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40008-022-00266-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avi J. Cohen, 2003. "Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 199-214, Winter.
    2. Thijs ten Raa & Debesh Chakraborty & Tuhin Das, 2009. "Working Capital in an Input–Output Model," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 15, pages 263-281, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. Zonghie Han & Bertram Schefold, 2006. "An empirical investigation of paradoxes: reswitching and reverse capital deepening in capital theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 30(5), pages 737-765, September.
    4. Stefano Zambelli, 2018. "The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical [Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(2), pages 383-426.
    5. Paul A. Samuelson, 1966. "A Summing Up," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(4), pages 568-583.
    6. Thijs ten Raa, 2019. "The use–make framework and the derivation of functional forms in production theory," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 132-141, January.
    7. Thijs ten Raa, 2009. "Dynamic Input–Output Analysis with Distributed Activities," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Input–Output Economics: Theory And Applications Featuring Asian Economies, chapter 13, pages 197-224, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vienneau, Robert L., 2019. "Structural economic dynamics, markups, real Wicksell effects, and the reverse substitution of labor," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 216-226.
    2. Stefano Zambelli, 2018. "Production of commodities by means of commodities and non‐uniform rates of profits," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 791-819, November.
    3. J. Barkley Rosser, 2020. "Austrian themes and the Cambridge capital theory controversies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 415-431, December.
    4. Carlo Milana, 2019. "Solving the Reswitching Paradox in the Sraffian Theory of Capital," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(6), pages 97-125, November.
    5. Michael Osborne & Ian Davidson, 2016. "The Cambridge capital controversies: contributions from the complex plane," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 251-269, April.
    6. Schefold, Bertram, 2022. "The Rarity of Reswitching Explained," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP58, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    7. Robert L. Vienneau, 2017. "The Choice of Technique with Multiple and Complex Interest Rates," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 440-453, July.
    8. Kersting, Götz & Schefold, Bertram, 2021. "Best techniques leave little room for substitution. A new critique of the production function," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 509-533.
    9. Schefold, Bertram, 2023. "The rarity of reswitching explained," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 128-150.
    10. Jonathan F. Cogliano & Roberto Veneziani & Naoki Yoshihara, 2022. "Computational methods and classical‐Marxian economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 310-349, April.
    11. Hosseiny, Ali & Gallegati, Mauro, 2017. "Role of intensive and extensive variables in a soup of firms in economy to address long run prices and aggregate data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 470(C), pages 51-59.
    12. Carlo Milana, 2024. "Refuting Samuelson’s capitulation on the re-switching of techniques in the Cambridge capital controversy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 179-197, June.
    13. Eduard Braun, 2020. "Capital as in capitalism, or capital as in capital goods, or both?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 383-395, September.
    14. Nadia Garbellini, 2018. "Inequality in the 21st Century:A Critical Analysis of Piketty`s Work," Working Papers Series 69, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    15. Schefold, Bertram, 2008. "C.E.S. production functions in the light of the Cambridge critique," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 783-797, June.
    16. Kurose, Kazuhiro & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2016. "The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model and the Cambridge Capital Controversies," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2016-05, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    17. Roger W. Garrison, 2004. "A Roundabout Approach to Macroeconomics: Some Autobiographical Reflections," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 48(2), pages 26-40, October.
    18. Matteo Degasperi & Thomas Fredholm, 2010. "Productivity Accounting Based On Production Prices," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 267-281, May.
    19. Eric Kemp-Benedict & Crystal Drakes & Timothy J. Laing, 2018. "Export-Led Growth, Global Integration, and the External Balance of Small Island Developing States," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-25, June.
    20. van Suntum, Ulrich, 2008. "Dynamic efficiency and reswitching," CAWM Discussion Papers 8, University of Münster, Münster Center for Economic Policy (MEP).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jecstr:v:11:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s40008-022-00266-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.