IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v44y2022i4d10.1007_s10878-021-00723-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principal–agent problem under the linear contract

Author

Listed:
  • Guichen Gao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xinxin Han

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Li Ning

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Hing-Fung Ting

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Yong Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

We consider a classical principal–agent model in the contract theory. A principal designs the payment $$\mathbf {w}=\left\{ w_{0},w_{1},\ldots ,w_{n}\right\} $$ w = w 0 , w 1 , … , w n to incentivize the agent to enter into the contract. Given the payment $$\mathbf {w}$$ w , the agent will take hidden actions from her strategy set $$\mathbf {S_{t}^{n}}$$ S t n to finish it and from the perspective of the agent, she will select the best strategy to maximize her expected utility. Due to the hidden strategy set, the principal obtains the expected revenue $$R(S_{t}^{n})$$ R ( S t n ) from the agent. Furthermore, the principal has a non-decreasing revenue function r(k), which is common information, where k is the number of successful tasks in the total n independent tasks. The objective of the problem is to maximize the principal’s expected profit, i.e., $$\max _{S,\mathbf {w}}\left\{ R(S_{t}^{n})-P(S_{t}^{n},\mathbf {w})\right\} $$ max S , w R ( S t n ) - P ( S t n , w ) , where $$P(S_{t}^{n},\mathbf {w})$$ P ( S t n , w ) is the agent’s expected payment. The difficulty of this problem is due to the asymmetric information. If the principal knows all the information about the agent, then the optimal contract can be solved by linear programming. Based on Dütting et al. (in: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387, 2019), we consider the more general model. When information is asymmetric, we further analyze that the approximation ratio of the linear contract can reach $$(1-\alpha _{N})/(1-\alpha _{N}^{N})$$ ( 1 - α N ) / ( 1 - α N N ) , which improves the results of Dütting et al. (in: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387, 2019), where $$\alpha _{N}\in [0,1)$$ α N ∈ [ 0 , 1 ) is a given constant and the coefficient of the linear contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Guichen Gao & Xinxin Han & Li Ning & Hing-Fung Ting & Yong Zhang, 2022. "Principal–agent problem under the linear contract," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2286-2301, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00723-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bichler, Martin & Paulsen, Per, 2018. "A principal-agent model of bidding firms in multi-unit auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 20-40.
    2. Singham, D.I., 2019. "Sample average approximation for the continuous type principal-agent problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1050-1057.
    3. Jakša Cvitanić & Dylan Possamaï & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Dynamic programming approach to principal–agent problems," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, January.
    4. Grant, Simon & Jude Kline, J. & Quiggin, John, 2018. "Contracting under uncertainty: A principal–agent model with ambiguity averse parties," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 582-597.
    5. Corgnet, Brice & Gómez-Miñambres, Joaquín & Hernán-González, Roberto, 2018. "Goal setting in the principal–agent model: Weak incentives for strong performance," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 311-326.
    6. Schosser, Josef, 2019. "Consistency between principal and agent with differing time horizons: Computing incentives under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1113-1123.
    7. Brice Corgnet & Joaquín Gómez-Miñambres & Roberto Hernán-González, 2018. "Goal Setting in the Principal-Agent Model : Weak Incentives for Strong Performance," Post-Print hal-02312063, HAL.
    8. Ross, Stephen A, 1973. "The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 134-139, May.
    9. Gabriel Carroll, 2015. "Robustness and Linear Contracts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(2), pages 536-563, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilo Hernández & Dylan Possamaï, 2024. "Time‐inconsistent contract theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 1022-1085, July.
    2. Victor Gonzalez-Jimenez & Patricio S. Dalton & Charles N. Noussair, 2019. "The Dark Side of Monetary Bonuses: Theory and Experimental Evidence," Vienna Economics Papers vie1909, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    3. Víctor González-Jiménez, 2021. "Incentive contracts when agents distort probabilities," Vienna Economics Papers vie2101, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    4. Koch, Alexander K. & Nafziger, Julia, 2020. "Motivational goal bracketing: An experiment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Veronica Rattini, 2023. "Worker autonomy and performance: Evidence from a real‐effort experiment," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 300-327, April.
    6. Nafziger, Julia & Kaiser, Jonas P. & Koch, Alexander K, 2021. "Self-Set Goals Are Effective Self-Regulation Tools -- Despite Goal Revision," CEPR Discussion Papers 15716, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Aleksandr Alekseev, 2022. "Give me a challenge or give me a raise," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(1), pages 170-202, February.
    8. Bao, Zhengyang & Leibbrandt, Andreas, 2024. "Tournaments with safeguards: A blessing or a curse for women?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 292-306.
    9. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2025. "Gaussian agency problems with memory and linear contracts," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 143-176, January.
    10. Villeneuve, Stéphane & Abi Jaber, Eduardo, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," TSE Working Papers 22-1363, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    11. Matthew Cedergren & Valerie Li, 2024. "Round number reference points and irregular patterns in reported gross margins," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 3293-3327, December.
    12. Víctor González-Jiménez, 2021. "Incentive contracts when agents distort probabilities," Vienna Economics Papers 2101, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    13. Zhou, Danping & Zhang, Pan & Guo, Junhua, 2024. "Is one plus one greater than two? How Double target incentives stimulate green growth in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 340-350.
    14. Cettolin, Elena & Cole, Kym & Dalton, Patricio, 2022. "Improving Workers’ Performance in Small Firms : A Randomized Experiment on Goal Setting in Ghana," Discussion Paper 2022-028, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Hangbo Liu & Xuemeng Guo & Dachen Sheng, 2024. "The Impact of Heterogeneous Market Sentiments on Corporate Risk-Taking and Governance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Post-Print hal-03783062, HAL.
    17. Camilo Hern'andez & Dylan Possamai, 2023. "Time-inconsistent contract theory," Papers 2303.01601, arXiv.org.
    18. Argyro Avgoustaki & Almudena Cañibano, 2020. "Motivational Drivers of Extensive Work Effort: Are Long Hours Always Detrimental to Well‐being?," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 355-398, July.
    19. James Fan & Joaquín Gómez‐Miñambres & Samuel Smithers, 2020. "Make it too difficult, and I'll give up; let me succeed, and I'll excel: The interaction between assigned and personal goals," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(6), pages 964-975, September.
    20. Sebastian Fest & Ola Kvaløy & Petra Nieken & Anja Schöttner, 2019. "Motivation and incentives in an online labor market," CESifo Working Paper Series 7526, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00723-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.