IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v42y2021i2d10.1007_s10878-021-00706-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A 5-parameter complexity classification of the two-stage flow shop scheduling problem with job dependent storage requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Yakov Zinder

    (University of Technology)

  • Alexandr Kononov

    (Sobolev Institute of Mathematics)

  • Joey Fung

    (BHP)

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the two-machine scheduling problem where each job is to be processed on the first-stage machine and after that on the second-stage machine. In order to be processed, each job requires storage space that it seizes at the start of its processing on the first-stage machine and releases only at the completion of processing on the second-stage machine. The storage space is limited and its consumption varies from job to job. The goal is to minimise the time needed for the completion of all jobs. All instances of the considered scheduling problem are classified by means of five parameters. This leads to the sixty four families of instances. For each family, the paper establishes its computational complexity and, in the case of polynomial-time solvability, presents a polynomial-time algorithm, constructing an optimal schedule.

Suggested Citation

  • Yakov Zinder & Alexandr Kononov & Joey Fung, 2021. "A 5-parameter complexity classification of the two-stage flow shop scheduling problem with job dependent storage requirements," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 276-309, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:42:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00706-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-021-00706-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-021-00706-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-021-00706-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamilton Emmons & George Vairaktarakis, 2013. "Flow Shop Scheduling," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-5152-5, March.
    2. S. M. Johnson, 1954. "Optimal two‐ and three‐stage production schedules with setup times included," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 61-68, March.
    3. Peter Brucker, 2007. "Scheduling Algorithms," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-69516-5, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geser, Philine & Le, Hoang Thanh & Hartmann, Tom & Middendorf, Martin, 2022. "On permutation schedules for two-machine flow shops with buffer constraints and constant processing times on one machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 593-601.
    2. Alexander Kononov & Julia Memar & Yakov Zinder, 2022. "On a borderline between the NP-hard and polynomial-time solvable cases of the flow shop with job-dependent storage requirements," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 445-456, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vincent T’kindt & Federico Della Croce & Mathieu Liedloff, 2022. "Moderate exponential-time algorithms for scheduling problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 533-566, December.
    2. Alexander Kononov & Julia Memar & Yakov Zinder, 2022. "On a borderline between the NP-hard and polynomial-time solvable cases of the flow shop with job-dependent storage requirements," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 445-456, July.
    3. Mohamed Amine Mkadem & Aziz Moukrim & Mehdi Serairi, 2021. "Exact method for the two-machine flow-shop problem with time delays," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 375-406, March.
    4. Bock, Felix & Bruhn, Henning, 2021. "Case study on scheduling cyclic conveyor belts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Lee, Kangbok & Zheng, Feifeng & Pinedo, Michael L., 2019. "Online scheduling of ordered flow shops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 50-60.
    6. Wlodzimierz Szwarc & Jatinder N. D. Gupta, 1987. "A flow‐shop problem with sequence‐dependent additive setup times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 619-627, October.
    7. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu & Shisheng Li, 2016. "New results on two-machine flow-shop scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1493-1504, May.
    8. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    9. Vineet Jain & Tilak Raj, 2018. "An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for makespan estimation of flexible manufacturing system assembly shop: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1302-1314, December.
    10. Golpîra, Hêriş, 2020. "Smart Energy-Aware Manufacturing Plant Scheduling under Uncertainty: A Risk-Based Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Alexander Grigoriev & Martijn Holthuijsen & Joris van de Klundert, 2005. "Basic scheduling problems with raw material constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(6), pages 527-535, September.
    12. A. G. Leeftink & R. J. Boucherie & E. W. Hans & M. A. M. Verdaasdonk & I. M. H. Vliegen & P. J. Diest, 2018. "Batch scheduling in the histopathology laboratory," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 171-197, June.
    13. Yadong Wang & Baoqiang Fan & Jingang Zhai & Wei Xiong, 2019. "Two-machine flowshop scheduling in a physical examination center," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 363-374, January.
    14. Chen, Xin & Miao, Qian & Lin, Bertrand M.T. & Sterna, Malgorzata & Blazewicz, Jacek, 2022. "Two-machine flow shop scheduling with a common due date to maximize total early work," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 504-511.
    15. Wenchang Luo & Lin Chen & Guochuan Zhang, 2012. "Approximation schemes for two-machine flow shop scheduling with two agents," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 229-239, October.
    16. Miri Gilenson & Dvir Shabtay & Liron Yedidsion & Rohit Malshe, 2021. "Scheduling in multi-scenario environment with an agreeable condition on job processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 153-173, December.
    17. Rhonda Righter, 1997. "A generalized Johnson's rule for stochastic assembly systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 211-220, March.
    18. Vahid Nasrollahi & Ghasem Moslehi & Mohammad Reisi-Nafchi, 2022. "Minimizing the weighted sum of maximum earliness and maximum tardiness in a single-agent and two-agent form of a two-machine flow shop scheduling problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1403-1442, April.
    19. Talebiyan, Hesam & Dueñas-Osorio, Leonardo, 2023. "Auctions for resource allocation and decentralized restoration of interdependent networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    20. Goodchild, Anne V. & Daganzo, Carlos, 2005. "Performance Comparison of Crane Double CyclingStrategies," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt65s0d62v, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:42:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00706-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.