IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v21y2023i1d10.1007_s10257-022-00570-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can I help you? Design principles for task-oriented speech dialog systems in customer service

Author

Listed:
  • Thuy Duong Oesterreich

    (Osnabrück University)

  • Eduard Anton

    (Osnabrück University)

  • Julian Schuir

    (Osnabrück University)

  • Alexander Brehm

    (Osnabrück University)

  • Frank Teuteberg

    (Osnabrück University)

Abstract

Organizations are increasingly delegating customer inquiries to speech dialog systems (SDSs) to save personnel resources. However, customers often report frustration when interacting with SDSs due to poorly designed solutions. Despite these issues, design knowledge for SDSs in customer service remains elusive. To address this research gap, we employ the design science approach and devise a design theory for SDSs in customer service. The design theory, including 14 requirements and five design principles, draws on the principles of dialog theory and undergoes validation in three iterations using five hypotheses. A summative evaluation comprising a two-phase experiment with 205 participants yields positive results regarding the user experience of the artifact. This study contributes to design knowledge for SDSs in customer service and supports practitioners striving to implement similar systems in their organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thuy Duong Oesterreich & Eduard Anton & Julian Schuir & Alexander Brehm & Frank Teuteberg, 2023. "How can I help you? Design principles for task-oriented speech dialog systems in customer service," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 37-79, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:21:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-022-00570-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-022-00570-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-022-00570-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-022-00570-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Pfeuffer & Alexander Benlian & Henner Gimpel & Oliver Hinz, 2019. "Anthropomorphic Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 523-533, August.
    2. Nicolas Pfeuffer & Alexander Benlian & Henner Gimpel & Oliver Hinz, 2019. "Anthropomorphic Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 523-533, August.
    3. Anna-Maria Seeger & Armin Heinzl, 2018. "Human Versus Machine: Contingency Factors of Anthropomorphism as a Trust-Inducing Design Strategy for Conversational Agents," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 129-139, Springer.
    4. Stephan Diederich & Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2020. "Designing Anthropomorphic Enterprise Conversational Agents," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(3), pages 193-209, June.
    5. Joseph G. Walls & George R. Widmeyer & Omar A. El Sawy, 1992. "Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 36-59, March.
    6. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    7. Xueming Luo & Siliang Tong & Zheng Fang & Zhe Qu, 2019. "Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 937-947, November.
    8. Mathieu Templier & Guy Paré, 2018. "Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 503-550, September.
    9. Moon, Youngme, 2000. "Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 323-339, March.
    10. Jill Walsh & Brittany Leigh Andersen & James E. Katz & Jacob Groshek, 2018. "Personal Power and Agency When Dealing with Interactive Voice Response Systems and Alternative Modalities," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 60-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrich Gnewuch & Stefan Morana & Marc T. P. Adam & Alexander Maedche, 2022. "Opposing Effects of Response Time in Human–Chatbot Interaction," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 773-791, December.
    2. Sara Moussawi & Marios Koufaris & Raquel Benbunan-Fich, 2021. "How perceptions of intelligence and anthropomorphism affect adoption of personal intelligent agents," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 343-364, June.
    3. Mengjun Li & Ayoung Suh, 2022. "Anthropomorphism in AI-enabled technology: A literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2245-2275, December.
    4. Stephan Diederich & Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2020. "Designing Anthropomorphic Enterprise Conversational Agents," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(3), pages 193-209, June.
    5. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Rana, Omer F. & Ranjan, Rajiv & Morgan, Graham, 2022. "“Alexa, let’s talk about my productivity”: The impact of digital assistants on work productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 572-584.
    6. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Ciro Troise, 2023. "Live support by chatbots with artificial intelligence: A future research agenda," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    7. Stefan Stieglitz & Milad Mirbabaie & Nicholas R. J. Möllmann & Jannik Rzyski, 2022. "Collaborating with Virtual Assistants in Organizations: Analyzing Social Loafing Tendencies and Responsibility Attribution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 745-770, June.
    8. Justina Sidlauskiene & Yannick Joye & Vilte Auruskeviciene, 2023. "AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Mariani, Marcello M. & Hashemi, Novin & Wirtz, Jochen, 2023. "Artificial intelligence empowered conversational agents: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    10. Thure Georg Weimann & Hannes Schlieter & Alfred Benedikt Brendel, 2022. "Virtual Coaches," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(4), pages 515-528, August.
    11. Alexander Maedche & Christine Legner & Alexander Benlian & Benedikt Berger & Henner Gimpel & Thomas Hess & Oliver Hinz & Stefan Morana & Matthias Söllner, 2019. "AI-Based Digital Assistants," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 535-544, August.
    12. Frederik Ahlemann & Sven Dittes & Tim Fillbrunn & Kevin Rehring & Stefan Reining & Nils Urbach, 2023. "Managing In-Company IT Standardization: A Design Theory," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1161-1178, June.
    13. Adam, Martin & Wessel, Michael & Benlian, Alexander, 2024. "AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 144613, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    14. Rizomyliotis, Ioannis & Kastanakis, Minas N. & Giovanis, Apostolos & Konstantoulaki, Kleopatra & Kostopoulos, Ioannis, 2022. "“How mAy I help you today?” The use of AI chatbots in small family businesses and the moderating role of customer affective commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 329-340.
    15. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Ertugrul Uysal & Sascha Alavi & Valéry Bezençon, 2022. "Trojan horse or useful helper? A relationship perspective on artificial intelligence assistants with humanlike features," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1153-1175, November.
    17. Scott Schanke & Gordon Burtch & Gautam Ray, 2021. "Estimating the Impact of “Humanizing” Customer Service Chatbots," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 736-751, September.
    18. Jonas Wanner & Lukas-Valentin Herm & Kai Heinrich & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2079-2102, December.
    19. Martin Adam & Michael Wessel & Alexander Benlian, 2021. "AI-based chatbots in customer service and their effects on user compliance," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(2), pages 427-445, June.
    20. TaeWoo Kim & Hyejin Lee & Michelle Yoosun Kim & SunAh Kim & Adam Duhachek, 2023. "AI increases unethical consumer behavior due to reduced anticipatory guilt," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 785-801, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:21:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-022-00570-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.