IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v17y2019i1d10.1007_s10257-018-0374-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business process runtime models: towards bridging the gap between design, enactment, and evaluation of business processes

Author

Listed:
  • Anat Goldstein

    (Tel Aviv University)

  • Thomas Johanndeiter

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Ulrich Frank

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

Abstract

Business process management (BPM) broadly covers a lifecycle of four distinct phases: design, configuration, enactment, and analysis and evaluation. Most BPM tool suites impose a strict separation between these phases, i.e., in each phase different languages and tools are used and the transition between phases is indirect and costly. This paper presents an environment for integrating all phases of the BPM lifecycle in which business process (BP) types and their instances can be modeled, visualized, managed and automatically synchronized, using a shared representation of models and code. The environment extends the capabilities of BP models to be used not only for specifying BPs but also for: (1) enactment—creating instance objects that capture BP operational data; (2) monitoring BP instances as they progress; (3) visualizing performance indicators of executed BPs at runtime; and (4) navigating from a BP type model to its respective instance population. As opposed to existing tools, the proposed environment does not require regenerating the workflow schema when BP designs change, nor does it require additional adaptations to support monitoring. Thereby, we facilitate a continuous and dynamic BPM environment, where workflow specifications can be changed at runtime. Our solution integrates a meta-programming language called eXecutable Modeling Facility (XMF) and the multi-perspective enterprise modeling framework (MEMO).

Suggested Citation

  • Anat Goldstein & Thomas Johanndeiter & Ulrich Frank, 2019. "Business process runtime models: towards bridging the gap between design, enactment, and evaluation of business processes," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 27-64, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:17:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-018-0374-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-018-0374-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-018-0374-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-018-0374-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anonymous, 2001. "Abstracts of 2001 Conference Papers," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 769-808, December.
    2. Anat Goldstein & Ulrich Frank, 2016. "Components of a multi-perspective modeling method for designing and managing IT security systems," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 101-140, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Subashanthini & M. Pounambal, 2020. "Three stage hybrid encryption of cloud data with penta-layer security for online business users," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 379-404, September.
    2. Oliver Thomas & Simon Hagen & Ulrich Frank & Jan Recker & Lauri Wessel & Friedemann Kammler & Novica Zarvic & Ingo Timm, 2020. "Global Crises and the Role of BISE," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 385-396, August.
    3. Eckes Alfred E. & Bird Graham & Rajan Ramkishen S. & Canterbery E. Ray & Zaman M. Raquibuz & Taskin Fatma & Zaim Osman, 2000. "Global Economy Quarterly, Issue 2," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 109-109, December.
    4. Raslavicius, Laurencas & Grzybek, Anna & Dubrovin, Valeriy, 2011. "Bioenergy in Ukraine--Possibilities of rural development and opportunities for local communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3370-3379, June.
    5. Tianhui Chen & Lu Li, 2009. "Influence of health-related quality of life on health service utilization in addition to socio-demographic and morbidity variables among primary care patients in China," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 54(5), pages 325-332, October.
    6. Martin (Dae Youp) Kang & Anat Hovav, 2020. "Benchmarking Methodology for Information Security Policy (BMISP): Artifact Development and Evaluation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 221-242, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:17:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-018-0374-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.