IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v16y2018i1d10.1007_s10257-017-0354-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a compliance requirement management for SMSEs: a model and architecture

Author

Listed:
  • A. M. Mustapha

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • O. T. Arogundade

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • O. R. Vincent

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

  • O. J. Adeniran

    (Federal University of Agriculture)

Abstract

Today’s business entities face an ever-growing number of laws and regulations due to recent high profile business scandals and failures. Small and medium scale enterprises (SMSE) in developing countries do not have an efficient compliance checking mechanism to make their business processes compliant with these regulatory standards. This checking mechanism is needed to give the enterprises full assurance of complete adherence to regulatory standards, bodies, or Service Level Agreements. Therefore, a structured and efficient compliance management model is needed to aid SMSE in launching their businesses safely and to ensure business processes fit into the classical regulatory standards. This paper presents a business rules compliance checking model and architecture for SMSEs in developing countries to verify and monitor their business process models at design time and at run time. It involves a systematic compliance requirements classification and analysis that employs a goal based requirement engineering approach prior to design time verification. It also introduces the idea and demonstration of network analysis for runtime business processes monitoring. The business process model will be verified at design time using a Simple PROMELA Interpreter model checker through Linear Temporal Logic rules. The approaches were tested on a financial institution in Nigeria, a developing nation in Africa at the time of this research. In order to ensure that the choice of the requirements analysis approach was efficient, a number of standard metrics for evaluating requirements engineering techniques were used and promising results were obtained. We also carried out a comparative analysis of the proposed approach in this paper with the approaches of previous research papers. This approach proved to be effective in terms of clarity, simplicity, flexibility and expressiveness while reducing incomplete adherence of business processes and enhancing the correctness of the business process.

Suggested Citation

  • A. M. Mustapha & O. T. Arogundade & O. R. Vincent & O. J. Adeniran, 2018. "Towards a compliance requirement management for SMSEs: a model and architecture," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 155-185, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-017-0354-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-017-0354-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linh Thao Ly & Stefanie Rinderle-Ma & Kevin Göser & Peter Dadam, 2012. "On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 195-219, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. M. Mustapha & O. T. Arogundade & Sanjay Misra & Robertas Damasevicius & Rytis Maskeliunas, 2020. "A systematic literature review on compliance requirements management of business processes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(3), pages 561-576, June.
    2. Akhil Kumar & Wen Yao & Chao-Hsien Chu, 2013. "Flexible Process Compliance with Semantic Constraints Using Mixed-Integer Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 543-559, August.
    3. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    4. Jörg Becker & Patrick Delfmann & Hanns-Alexander Dietrich & Matthias Steinhorst & Mathias Eggert, 2016. "Business process compliance checking – applying and evaluating a generic pattern matching approach for conceptual models in the financial sector," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 359-405, April.
    5. Mustafa Hashmi & Guido Governatori & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2016. "Normative requirements for regulatory compliance: An abstract formal framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 429-455, June.
    6. Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou & Konstantina Spanaki, 2016. "Understanding governance, risk and compliance information systems (GRC IS): The experts view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1251-1263, December.
    7. A. M. Mustapha & O. T. Arogundade & Sanjay Misra & Robertas Damasevicius & Rytis Maskeliunas, 0. "A systematic literature review on compliance requirements management of business processes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    8. Shazia Sadiq & Michael Muehlen & Marta Indulska, 2012. "Preface," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 119-121, April.
    9. Shaio Yan Huang & Chao-Hsiung Lee & An-An Chiu & David C. Yen, 2015. "How business process reengineering affects information technology investment and employee performance under different performance measurement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1133-1144, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10257-017-0354-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.