IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infotm/v17y2016i3d10.1007_s10799-015-0230-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role, formation mechanism, and dynamic mechanism of action of technology standards in industrial systems

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Jiang

    (Jilin University)

  • Shukuan Zhao

    (Jilin University)

  • Chang Liu

    (Jilin University)

  • Yong Chen

    (Old Dominion University)

Abstract

This paper asserts that industrial systems are a kind of complex system and that their evolvement mechanism fits a dissipative structure well. By applying complex system theory, this paper explores the role of technology standards in industrial systems from the perspective of order parameters. In addition, by adopting a low concentration trimolecular model to study how technologies transfer and diffuse, this paper illuminates the formation mechanism of technology standards and their dynamic mechanisms of action. Furthermore, this paper provides scales for the evolvement of industrial structures and attributes from the perspective of entropy theory. It also discusses organization formats and principles for promoting technology standardization in industrial systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Jiang & Shukuan Zhao & Chang Liu & Yong Chen, 2016. "The role, formation mechanism, and dynamic mechanism of action of technology standards in industrial systems," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 289-302, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:17:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10799-015-0230-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10799-015-0230-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10799-015-0230-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10799-015-0230-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Farrell & Garth Saloner, 1988. "Coordination through Committees and Markets," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 19(2), pages 235-252, Summer.
    2. Kano, Sadahiko, 2000. "Technical innovations, standardization and regional comparison -- a case study in mobile communications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 305-321, May.
    3. Sendil K. Ethiraj & Daniel Levinthal, 2004. "Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 159-173, February.
    4. Li, Ling, 2011. "Assessing the relational benefits of logistics services perceived by manufacturers in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 58-67, July.
    5. Hong Jiang & Shukuan Zhao & Kaiqi Yin & Yue Yuan & Zhuming Bi, 2014. "An Analogical Induction Approach to Technology Standardization and Technology Development," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 366-382, May.
    6. David, Paul A & Steinmueller, W Edward, 1996. "Standards, trade and competition in the emerging global information infrastructure environment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(10), pages 817-830, December.
    7. Hong Jiang & Shukuan Zhao & Xiangyu Wang & Zhuming Bi, 2013. "Applying Electromagnetic Field Theory to Study the Synergistic Relationships Between Technology Standardization and Technology Development," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 272-286, May.
    8. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich, 2012. "Licensing technology to shape standards: Examining the influence of the industry context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(5), pages 851-861.
    9. Bruce Kogut, 2000. "The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 405-425, March.
    10. Stanley M. Besen & Joseph Farrell, 1994. "Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 117-131, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seong-Taek Park & Jae-Rim Jung & Chang Liu, 2020. "A study on policy measure for knowledge-based management in ICT companies: focused on appropriability mechanisms," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Pan Wang & Sohail Chaudhry & Li Da Xu, 2016. "Introduction: Advances in e-business engineering and management," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 199-201, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Jiang & Shukuan Zhao & Zhi Li & Yong Chen, 2016. "Interaction between technology standardization and technology development: a coupling effect study," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 229-243, September.
    2. G. Kaa & M. J. Greeven, 2017. "Mobile telecommunication standardization in Japan, China, the United States, and Europe: a comparison of regulatory and industrial regimes," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 181-192, May.
    3. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Tobias Kretschmer & Katrin Muehlfeld, 2004. "Co-opetition in Standard-Setting: The Case of the Compact Disc," Working Papers 04-14, NET Institute, revised Oct 2004.
    5. Justus Baron & Daniel F. Spulber, 2018. "Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 462-503, September.
    6. Daniel P. Gross, 2020. "Collusive Investments in Technological Compatibility: Lessons from U.S. Railroads in the Late 19th Century," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5683-5700, December.
    7. Vitor Trindade & Johannes Moenius, 2007. "Networks, Standards and Intellectual Property Rights," Working Papers 0705, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    8. Megan Lawrence & Christopher Poliquin, 2023. "The growth of hierarchy in organizations: Managing knowledge scope," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3155-3184, December.
    9. Belleflamme, Paul, 2002. "Coordination on formal vs. de facto standards: a dynamic approach," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 153-176, March.
    10. Wiegmann, Paul Moritz & de Vries, Henk J. & Blind, Knut, 2017. "Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1370-1386.
    11. Oz Shy, 2011. "A Short Survey of Network Economics," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(2), pages 119-149, March.
    12. Tor Winston, 2006. "Innovation and Ex Ante Consideration of Licensing Terms in Standard Setting," EAG Discussions Papers 200603, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    13. Foucart, Renaud & Li, Qian Cher, 2021. "The role of technology standards in product innovation: Theory and evidence from UK manufacturing firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    14. van Wegberg, M.J., 2003. "The grand coalition versus competing coalitions: trade-offs in how to standardize," Research Memorandum 021, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    15. Kretschmer, Tobias & Muehlfeld, Katrin, 2006. "Co-opetition and prelaunch in standard-setting for developing technologies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19843, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Toivanen, Otto, 2004. "Choosing Standards," Discussion Papers 937, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    17. Achim Hecker & Tobias Kretschmer, 2014. "Public R&D as a Standard-Setting Device," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7-8), pages 599-615, November.
    18. Philipp Tuertscher & Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy, 2014. "Justification and Interlaced Knowledge at ATLAS, CERN," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1579-1608, December.
    19. Patrucco, Pier Paolo, 2013. "The Evolution of Knowledge Organization: The Emergence of Innovation Platform in the Turin Car System," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201315, University of Turin.
    20. Ewald Scherm & Christian Maaß, 2006. "Zum Stellenwert der Netzwerkökonomik in der Strategie-/Marketingforschung —Eine Analyse empirischer Untersuchungen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 27-46, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infotm:v:17:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10799-015-0230-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.