IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v26y2024i5d10.1007_s10796-021-10138-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligible Description Language Contract (IDLC) – A Novel Smart Contract Model

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Qin

    (University of Macau)

  • Weiming Tan

    (University of Macau)

  • Jingzhi Guo

    (University of Macau)

  • Bingqing Shen

    (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)

Abstract

The development of Industry 4.0, smart contract is one of critical application in the blockchain platform, which is the remove of intermediary services to facilitate transactions directly between stakeholders, in which the trust between stakeholders is guaranteed by a blockchain system. However, existing solution of automated execution of smart contract is simply given by the prescribed program code. This solution results in two negative effects: the contract is not human-readable and difficult to modify; contracting parties cannot collaboratively draft the contract and cannot assure the shared consent of the contract. Therefore, we will introduce a brand-new solution of smart contract, called Intelligible Description Language Contract (IDLC). It will allow contracting parties to draft a contract collaboratively just as working on text editor with a supportive tool of concept disambiguation through Supervised Sentence Contract (SSC). SSC consists of Machine Natural language (MNL) via Semantic input method (SIM). SIM provides a method of supervised contract obligation creation. MNL provides the capability of universal computer-understandability. Meanwhile, in the complex contract transactions and management, especially in supply chain management, a chained evidence sequence is designed to avoid collusion. IDLC is a first paradigm that bridges the traditional contract based on natural languages and the smart contract based on blockchain platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Qin & Weiming Tan & Jingzhi Guo & Bingqing Shen, 2024. "Intelligible Description Language Contract (IDLC) – A Novel Smart Contract Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1597-1614, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-021-10138-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-021-10138-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-021-10138-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-021-10138-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maryam Abdirad & Krishna Krishnan & Deepak Gupta, 2021. "A two-stage metaheuristic algorithm for the dynamic vehicle routing problem in Industry 4.0 approach," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 69-83, January.
    2. Sebahattin Demirkan & Irem Demirkan & Andrew McKee, 2020. "Blockchain technology in the future of business cyber security and accounting," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 189-208, April.
    3. Ling Li, 2020. "Education supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 579-592, July.
    4. Paul Rimba & An Binh Tran & Ingo Weber & Mark Staples & Alexander Ponomarev & Xiwei Xu, 2020. "Correction to: Quantifying the Cost of Distrust: Comparing Blockchain and Cloud Services for Business Process Execution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 509-510, April.
    5. Andrew J. Ehrenberg & John Leslie King, 2020. "Blockchain in Context," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 29-35, February.
    6. Turner, J.R., 2001. "Project Contract Management and a Theory of Organization," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-43-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Juan Du & Hengqing Jing & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo & Vijayan Sugumaran & Daniel Castro-Lacouture, 2020. "An Ontology and Multi-Agent Based Decision Support Framework for Prefabricated Component Supply Chain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1467-1485, December.
    8. Paul Rimba & An Binh Tran & Ingo Weber & Mark Staples & Alexander Ponomarev & Xiwei Xu, 2020. "Quantifying the Cost of Distrust: Comparing Blockchain and Cloud Services for Business Process Execution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 489-507, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ling Li, 2024. "Industry 4.0 and Beyond," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1581-1583, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vineet Paliwal & Shalini Chandra & Suneel Sharma, 2020. "Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review and a Classification Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    2. Sujata Seshadrinathan & Shalini Chandra, 2025. "Trusting the trustless blockchain for its adoption in accounting: theorizing the mediating role of technology-organization-environment framework," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Yong Chen & Yang Lu & Larisa Bulysheva & Mikhail Yu. Kataev, 2024. "Applications of Blockchain in Industry 4.0: a Review," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1715-1729, October.
    4. Hanisch, Marvin & Goldsby, Curtis M. & Fabian, Nicolai E. & Oehmichen, Jana, 2023. "Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Ping Yung, 2015. "A new institutional economic theory of project management," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 228-243, February.
    6. Gajendra Liyanaarachchi & Giampaolo Viglia & Fidan Kurtaliqi, 2024. "Addressing challenges of digital transformation with modified blockchain," Post-Print hal-04440365, HAL.
    7. Joshua Steinfeld & Ron Carlee & Kouliga Koala, 2020. "DBFOM Contracting and Public Stewardship in the Norfolk-Portsmouth Elizabeth River Tunnels Public-Private Partnership," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-62, March.
    8. Lippman, Steven A. & McCardle, Kevin F. & Tang, Christopher S., 2013. "Using Nash bargaining to design project management contracts under cost uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 199-207.
    9. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2022. "An Empirical Framework for Assessing the Balanced Scorecard Impact on Sustainable Development in Healthcare Performance Measurement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Cezar-Petre SIMION & Stefan Catalin POPA, 2017. "Evolution Of Research In Project Management. An Analysis Of The Research Results Published In The Period 1999-2017," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 956-964, November.
    11. Wai Peng Wong & Muhammad Fahad Anwar & Keng Lin Soh, 2024. "Transportation 4.0 in supply chain management: State-of-the-art and future directions towards 5.0 in the transportation sector," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 683-710, June.
    12. Farheen Naz & Rohit Agrawal & Anil Kumar & Angappa Gunasekaran & Abhijit Majumdar & Sunil Luthra, 2022. "Reviewing the applications of artificial intelligence in sustainable supply chains: Exploring research propositions for future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2400-2423, July.
    13. Emilio Abad-Segura & Alfonso Infante-Moro & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Eloy López-Meneses, 2021. "Blockchain Technology for Secure Accounting Management: Research Trends Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Emilio Abad-Segura & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar, 2020. "Research Analysis on Emerging Technologies in Corporate Accounting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-29, September.
    15. Chunling Li & Nosherwan Khaliq & Leslie Chinove & Usama Khaliq & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2023. "Cryptocurrency Acceptance Model to Analyze Consumers’ Usage Intention: Evidence From Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    16. Diego Valentinetti & Michele A. Rea, 2022. "Blockchain e bilancio di esercizio: verso una convergenza di interessi "distribuita"?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 15-40.
    17. R. Ramesh & H. R. Rao, 2020. "ISF Editorial 2020," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-9, February.
    18. Xueling Li & Xiaoyan Zhang & Yuan Liu & Yuanying Mi & Yong Chen, 2022. "The impact of artificial intelligence on users' entrepreneurial activities," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 597-608, May.
    19. James R. Barth & Hemantha S. B. Herath & Tejaswini C. Herath & Pei Xu, 2020. "Cryptocurrency valuation and ethics: a text analytic approach," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 367-388, July.
    20. Nguyen Phu Giang & Hoang Thi Tam, 2023. "Impacts of Blockchain on Accounting in the Business," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s10796-021-10138-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.