IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v23y2021i1d10.1007_s10796-020-10001-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quarry: A User-centered Big Data Integration Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Petar Jovanovic

    (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech))

  • Sergi Nadal

    (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech))

  • Oscar Romero

    (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech))

  • Alberto Abelló

    (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech))

  • Besim Bilalli

    (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (BarcelonaTech))

Abstract

Obtaining valuable insights and actionable knowledge from data requires cross-analysis of domain data typically coming from various sources. Doing so, inevitably imposes burdensome processes of unifying different data formats, discovering integration paths, and all this given specific analytical needs of a data analyst. Along with large volumes of data, the variety of formats, data models, and semantics drastically contribute to the complexity of such processes. Although there have been many attempts to automate various processes along the Big Data pipeline, no unified platforms accessible by users without technical skills (like statisticians or business analysts) have been proposed. In this paper, we present a Big Data integration platform (Quarry) that uses hypergraph-based metadata to facilitate (and largely automate) the integration of domain data coming from a variety of sources, and provides an intuitive interface to assist end users both in: (1) data exploration with the goal of discovering potentially relevant analysis facets, and (2) consolidation and deployment of data flows which integrate the data, and prepare them for further analysis (descriptive or predictive), visualization, and/or publishing. We validate Quarry’s functionalities with the use case of World Health Organization (WHO) epidemiologists and data analysts in their fight against Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs).

Suggested Citation

  • Petar Jovanovic & Sergi Nadal & Oscar Romero & Alberto Abelló & Besim Bilalli, 2021. "Quarry: A User-centered Big Data Integration Platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 9-33, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10001-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-020-10001-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-020-10001-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-020-10001-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Artur Wojciechowski, 2018. "ETL workflow reparation by means of case-based reasoning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 21-43, February.
    2. Chong Ju Choi & Carla C. J. M. Millar & Caroline Y. L. Wong, 2005. "Knowledge and the State," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Knowledge Entanglements, chapter 0, pages 19-38, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Dimitrios Skoutas & Alkis Simitsis, 2007. "Ontology-Based Conceptual Design of ETL Processes for Both Structured and Semi-Structured Data," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 3(4), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Artur Wojciechowski, 0. "ETL workflow reparation by means of case-based reasoning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petar Jovanovic & Sergi Nadal & Oscar Romero & Alberto Abelló & Besim Bilalli, 0. "Quarry: A User-centered Big Data Integration Platform," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-25.
    2. Ladjel Bellatreche & Patrick Valduriez & Tadeusz Morzy, 2018. "Advances in Databases and Information Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-6, February.
    3. Oliver Hinz & Jochen Eckert, 2010. "The Impact of Search and Recommendation Systems on Sales in Electronic Commerce," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(2), pages 67-77, April.
    4. Xiao-Bai Li & Jialun Qin, 2017. "Anonymizing and Sharing Medical Text Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 332-352, June.
    5. Lawrence Bunnell & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Victoria Y. Yoon, 0. "RecSys Issues Ontology: A Knowledge Classification of Issues for Recommender Systems Researchers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-42.
    6. Martinovici, A., 2019. "Revealing attention - how eye movements predict brand choice and moment of choice," Other publications TiSEM 7dca38a5-9f78-4aee-bd81-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Joanna Sokolowska & Patrycja Sleboda, 2015. "The Inverse Relation Between Risks and Benefits: The Role of Affect and Expertise," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1252-1267, July.
    8. Donald R. Haurin & Stuart S. Rosenthal, 2009. "Language, Agglomeration and Hispanic Homeownership," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 155-183, June.
    9. Jong Won Min, 2019. "The Influence of Stigma and Views on Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness on Service Use by Age and Ethnicity: Evidence From the CDC BRFSS 2007, 2009, and 2012," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, September.
    10. Zhan (Michael) Shi & T. S. Raghu, 2020. "An Economic Analysis of Product Recommendation in the Presence of Quality and Taste-Match Heterogeneity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 399-411, June.
    11. Voxi Amavilah & Antonio R. Andrés, 2014. "Globalization, Peace & Stability, Governance, and Knowledge Economy," Research Africa Network Working Papers 14/012, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    12. Alwang, Jeffrey & Larochelle, Catherine & Barrera, Victor, 2017. "Farm Decision Making and Gender: Results from a Randomized Experiment in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 117-129.
    13. Yanina Welp & Ferran Urgell & Eduard Aibar, 2007. "From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Administration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 299-316, December.
    14. Brent Hammer & Helen Vallianatos & Candace Nykiforuk & Laura Nieuwendyk, 2015. "Perceptions of healthy eating in four Alberta communities: a photovoice project," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(4), pages 649-662, December.
    15. Amine Dadoun & Michael Defoin-Platel & Thomas Fiig & Corinne Landra & Raphaël Troncy, 2021. "How recommender systems can transform airline offer construction and retailing," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 301-315, June.
    16. Asma Dhaouadi & Khadija Bousselmi & Mohamed Mohsen Gammoudi & Sébastien Monnet & Slimane Hammoudi, 2022. "Data Warehousing Process Modeling from Classical Approaches to New Trends: Main Features and Comparisons," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-38, August.
    17. Parag, Yael & Darby, Sarah, 2009. "Consumer-supplier-government triangular relations: Rethinking the UK policy path for carbon emissions reduction from the UK residential sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 3984-3992, October.
    18. Umberto Panniello & Michele Gorgoglione & Alexander Tuzhilin, 2016. "Research Note—In CARSs We Trust: How Context-Aware Recommendations Affect Customers’ Trust and Other Business Performance Measures of Recommender Systems," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 182-196, March.
    19. Shiau, Wen-Lung & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Yang, Han Suan, 2017. "Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 390-399.
    20. Kim, Jae Kyeong & Kim, Hyea Kyeong & Oh, Hee Young & Ryu, Young U., 2010. "A group recommendation system for online communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 212-219.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:23:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10796-020-10001-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.