IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v18y2016i4d10.1007_s10796-015-9559-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CHOOSE: Towards a metamodel for enterprise architecture in small and medium-sized enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Bernaert

    (Ghent University
    inno.com Institute)

  • Geert Poels

    (Ghent University)

  • Monique Snoeck

    (K.U. Leuven)

  • Manu Backer

    (Ghent University
    University of Antwerp)

Abstract

Enterprise architecture (EA) is a coherent whole of principles, methods, and models that are used in the design and realization of an enterprise’s organizational structure, business processes, information systems, and IT infrastructure. Recent research indicates the need for EA in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), important drivers of the economy, as they struggle with problems related to a lack of structure and overview of their business. However, existing EA frameworks are perceived as too complex and, to date, none of the EA approaches are sufficiently adapted to the SME context. Therefore, this paper presents the CHOOSE metamodel for EA in SMEs that was developed and evaluated through action research in an SME and further refined and validated through case study research in five other SMEs. This metamodel is based on the essential dimensions of EA frameworks and is kept simple so that it may be applied in an SME context. The final CHOOSE metamodel includes only four essential concepts (i.e. goal, actor, operation, object), one for each most frequently used EA focus. As an example, an extract is included from the specific model that was created for the SME used in our action research. Finally, the CHOOSE metamodel is evaluated according to the dimensions essential in EA and the requirements for EA in an SME context.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Bernaert & Geert Poels & Monique Snoeck & Manu Backer, 2016. "CHOOSE: Towards a metamodel for enterprise architecture in small and medium-sized enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 781-818, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9559-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-015-9559-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-015-9559-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-015-9559-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milind Kumar Sharma, 2007. "Information system architecture: a framework for Indian small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Enterprise Network Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 406-424.
    2. Jack van't Wout & Maarten Waage & Herman Hartman & Max Stahlecker & Aaldert Hofman, 2010. "The Integrated Architecture Framework Explained," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-11518-9, June.
    3. Henk Jonkers & Marc M. Lankhorst & Hugo W. L. ter Doest & Farhad Arbab & Hans Bosma & Roel J. Wieringa, 2006. "Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 63-66, February.
    4. Pavel Balabko & Alain Wegmann, 2006. "Systemic classification of concern-based design methods in the context of enterprise architecture," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 115-131, February.
    5. Hegge, H. M. H. & Wortmann, J. C., 1991. "Generic bill-of-material: a new product model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-3), pages 117-128, October.
    6. Åsa Lindström & Pontus Johnson & Erik Johansson & Mathias Ekstedt & Mårten Simonsson, 2006. "A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 81-90, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grafelmann, Michaela & Zlotos, Constatin & Lange, Ann-Kathrin & Jahn, Carlos, 2020. "Modelling the IT and business process landscapes at inland intermodal terminals," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 159-179, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    2. Gong, Yiwei & Janssen, Marijn, 2019. "The value of and myths about enterprise architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Negin Banaeianjahromi & Kari Smolander, 2019. "Lack of Communication and Collaboration in Enterprise Architecture Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 877-908, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    2. van der Vlist, Piet & Hoppenbrouwers, Jurgen J. E. M. & Hegge, Herman M. H., 1997. "Extending the enterprise through multi-level supply control," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 35-42, November.
    3. Gaigné, C. & Hovelaque, V. & Mechouar, Y., 2020. "Carbon tax and sustainable facility location: The role of production technology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Yiwei Gong & Marijn Janssen, 2023. "Why Organizations Fail in Implementing Enterprise Architecture Initiatives?," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1401-1419, August.
    5. Nino Rurua & Rik Eshuis & Maryam Razavian, 2019. "Representing Variability in Enterprise Architecture," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(2), pages 215-227, April.
    6. Harry Bouwman & Mark Reuver & Marikka Heikkilä & Erwin Fielt, 2020. "Business model tooling: where research and practice meet," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 413-419, September.
    7. Ralph Foorthuis & Marlies Steenbergen & Sjaak Brinkkemper & Wiel A. G. Bruls, 2016. "A theory building study of enterprise architecture practices and benefits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 541-564, June.
    8. Felix Laumann & Torben Tambo, 2018. "Enterprise Architecture for a Facilitated Transformation from a Linear to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    9. Duong Dang & Samuli Pekkola, 0. "Institutional Perspectives on the Process of Enterprise Architecture Adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    10. Duong Dang & Samuli Pekkola, 2020. "Institutional Perspectives on the Process of Enterprise Architecture Adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1433-1445, December.
    11. Struijs Peter & Camstra Astrea & Renssen Robbert & Braaksma Barteld, 2013. "Redesign of Statistics Production within an Architectural Framework: The Dutch Experience," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(1), pages 49-71, March.
    12. Na Zhang & Yu Yang & Yujie Zheng & Jiafu Su, 2019. "Module partition of complex mechanical products based on weighted complex networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1973-1998, April.
    13. Gong, Yiwei & Janssen, Marijn, 2019. "The value of and myths about enterprise architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.
    14. Ana Maria Magalhães Correia & Clarissa Figueredo Rocha & Luiz Carlos Duclós & Claudimar Pereira da Veiga, 2021. "Integration of Business Processes With Activities and Information: Evidence From Brazil," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    15. Hossein Safari & Zahra Faraji & Setareh Majidian, 2016. "Identifying and evaluating enterprise architecture risks using FMEA and fuzzy VIKOR," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 475-486, April.
    16. Michael Möhring & Barbara Keller & Rainer Schmidt & Kurt Sandkuhl & Alfred Zimmermann, 2023. "Digitalization and enterprise architecture management: a perspective on benefits and challenges," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Lopez-Nicolas, Carolina & Soto-Acosta, Pedro, 2010. "Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: An empirical investigation in SMEs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 521-528.
    18. Bertrand, J. W. M. & Zuijderwijk, M. & Hegge, H. M. H., 2000. "Using hierarchical pseudo bills of material for customer order acceptance and optimal material replenishment in assemble to order manufacturing of non-modular products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 171-184, June.
    19. Clément Chatras & Vincent Giard & Mustapha Sali, 2016. "Mass customisation impact on bill of materials structure and master production schedule development," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(18), pages 5634-5650, September.
    20. Kherbach OUALID & Marian Liviu MOCAN & Cristian DUMITRACHE & Ghoumrassi AMINE, 2016. "Overview Of Information Technology And A Theoretical Model In Supply Chain Management For Local Smes," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 12, pages 527-537, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:18:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10796-015-9559-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.