IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v12y2010i3d10.1007_s10796-008-9144-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ontological modelling of user requirements for personalised information provision

Author

Listed:
  • Lily Sun

    (University of Reading)

  • Khadidjatou Ousmanou

    (University of Reading)

  • Matthew Cross

    (University of Reading)

Abstract

The knowledge economy offers opportunity to a broad and diverse community of information systems users to efficiently gain information and know-how for improving qualifications and enhancing productivity in the work place. Such demand will continue and users will frequently require optimised and personalised information content. The advancement of information technology and the wide dissemination of information endorse individual users when constructing new knowledge from their experience in the real-world context. However, a design of personalised information provision is challenging because users’ requirements and information provision specifications are complex in their representation. The existing methods are not able to effectively support this analysis process. This paper presents a mechanism which can holistically facilitate customisation of information provision based on individual users’ goals, level of knowledge and cognitive styles preferences. An ontology model with embedded norms represents the domain knowledge of information provision in a specific context where users’ needs can be articulated and represented in a user profile. These formal requirements can then be transformed onto information provision specifications which are used to discover suitable information content from repositories and pedagogically organise the selected content to meet the users’ needs. The method is provided with adaptability which enables an appropriate response to changes in users’ requirements during the process of acquiring knowledge and skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Lily Sun & Khadidjatou Ousmanou & Matthew Cross, 2010. "An ontological modelling of user requirements for personalised information provision," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 337-356, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:12:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-008-9144-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-008-9144-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-008-9144-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-008-9144-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dongsong Zhang & Jay F. Nunamaker, 2003. "Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 207-218, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. I-Ching Hsu, 2013. "Personalized web feeds based on ontology technologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 465-479, July.
    2. Chulhwan Chris Bang, 2015. "Information systems frontiers: Keyword analysis and classification," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 217-237, February.
    3. Álvaro Carrera & Carlos A. Iglesias & Mercedes Garijo, 2014. "Beast methodology: An agile testing methodology for multi-agent systems based on behaviour driven development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 169-182, April.
    4. Hui Huang & Xueguang Chen & Zhiwu Wang, 2015. "Failure recovery in distributed model composition with intelligent assistance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 673-689, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Temperini, Valerio & Gregori, Gian Luca & Pizzichini, Lucia, 2019. "E-learning as a marketing tool for Tour Operators. The ‘Go Academy’ case study," MPRA Paper 94075, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Yan Mandy Dang & Yulei Gavin Zhang & James Morgan, 0. "Integrating switching costs to information systems adoption: An empirical study on learning management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    3. Wenan Tan & Senbo Chen & Leer Li & Ling Xia Li & Anqiong Tang & Tong Wang, 0. "A method toward dynamic e-learning services modeling and the cooperative learning mechanism," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-12.
    4. Rose Chikopela & Francis S. Sikanyika & Cynthia N. Kalizinje & Grace Sondashi, 2021. "Digitalization of Teaching and Learning: Experiences and Opportunities in Selected Higher Learning Institutions in Zambia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(09), pages 43-53, September.
    5. Shakeel Iqbal, 2011. "Learning Management Systems (LMS): Inside Matters," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(4), pages 206-216.
    6. Ugljesa Marjanovic & Milan Delić & Bojan Lalic, 2016. "Developing a model to assess the success of e-learning systems: evidence from a manufacturing company in transitional economy," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 253-272, May.
    7. Budi Harsanto, 2014. "Innovation to Enhance Blended Learning Experience: Applying Google Sites in Higher Education," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(1), pages 17-24.
    8. Thompson S. H. Teo & Sojung Lucia Kim & Li Jiang, 2020. "E-Learning Implementation in South Korea: Integrating Effectiveness and Legitimacy Perspectives," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 511-528, April.
    9. Zoroja Jovana, 2016. "Impact of ICTs on Innovation Activities: Indication for selected European countries," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 62(3), pages 39-51, September.
    10. Minhong Wang, 2011. "Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in Web 2.0-based workplace e-learning," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 191-205, April.
    11. Shouhong Wang & Hai Wang, 2012. "Organizational schemata of e-portfolios for fostering higher-order thinking," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 395-407, April.
    12. Zaikin, Oleg & Kushtina, Emma & Rozewski, Przemyslaw, 2006. "Model and algorithm of the conceptual scheme formation for knowledge domain in distance learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1379-1399, December.
    13. Nguyen Chau Bich Tuyen & Nguyen Thuy Nga & Nguyen Thi Xuan Mai, 2022. "Applying Project-Based-Learning to improve English speaking skills of remote learners at tertiary education," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 12(2), pages 85-103.
    14. Wenan Tan & Senbo Chen & Leer Li & Ling Xia Li & Anqiong Tang & Tong Wang, 2017. "A method toward dynamic e-learning services modeling and the cooperative learning mechanism," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 119-130, June.
    15. Yan Mandy Dang & Yulei Gavin Zhang & James Morgan, 2017. "Integrating switching costs to information systems adoption: An empirical study on learning management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 625-644, June.
    16. T Darvenkumar & W Christopher Rajasekaran, 2023. "Unlocking the Power of Online Gaming: Exploring Its Potential as a Language and Communication Tool in the English Classroom - A Survey," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(6), pages 197-207, September.
    17. Asad Afzal Humayoun & Kashif Ur Rehman, 2013. "Technology Based Employees Training and Organizational Performance as Perceived by Employees," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 5(8), pages 417-423.
    18. Dominici, Gandolfo & Palumbo, Federica, 2013. "How to build an e-learning product: Factors for student/customer satisfaction," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 87-96.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:12:y:2010:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-008-9144-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.