IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v9y2018i5d10.1007_s13198-018-0708-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-indicator modeling method for similarity-based residual useful life estimation with two selection processes

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyao Gu

    (Chongqing University)

  • Youling Chen

    (Chongqing University)

Abstract

The similarity-based residual useful life prediction (SbRLP) approach, a burgeoning technique, plays an increasingly important role in the residual useful life (RUL) prediction. Currently, studies on taking (a) the selection of degradation indicatorsf; and (b) the selection of reference samples into account are rare. While they have positive influence on improving the performance of the SbRLP method with multiple degradation indicator (MSbRLP). Driven by the abovementioned gap, two novel selection processes are advanced by this article and thus an improved MSbRLP method is developed. Then, in case study of the gyroscope RUL estimation, two selection processes and the improved MSbRLP method are illustrated to be reasonable and effective by comparison with the classical MSbRLP method. Furthermore, implementing results reveal that the existence of degradation indicator having bad reflection effect will truly increase the recognition error of the degradation state and hence decrease the accuracy of RUL estimation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyao Gu & Youling Chen, 2018. "A multi-indicator modeling method for similarity-based residual useful life estimation with two selection processes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(5), pages 987-998, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0708-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-018-0708-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-018-0708-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-018-0708-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Mosallam & K. Medjaher & N. Zerhouni, 2016. "Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 1037-1048, October.
    2. Zio, Enrico & Di Maio, Francesco, 2010. "A data-driven fuzzy approach for predicting the remaining useful life in dynamic failure scenarios of a nuclear system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 49-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikhil M. Thoppil & V. Vasu & C. S. P. Rao, 2021. "Health indicator construction and remaining useful life estimation for mechanical systems using vibration signal prognostics," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(5), pages 1001-1010, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merainani, Boualem & Laddada, Sofiane & Bechhoefer, Eric & Chikh, Mohamed Abdessamed Ait & Benazzouz, Djamel, 2022. "An integrated methodology for estimating the remaining useful life of high-speed wind turbine shaft bearings with limited samples," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1141-1151.
    2. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Le Son, Khanh & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoît, 2013. "Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 165-175.
    4. Xiaojia Wang & Ting Huang & Keyu Zhu & Xibin Zhao, 2022. "LSTM-Based Broad Learning System for Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Bellaera, R. & Bonifetto, R. & Di Maio, F. & Pedroni, N. & Savoldi, L. & Zanino, R. & Zio, E., 2020. "Integrated deterministic and probabilistic safety assessment of a superconducting magnet cryogenic cooling circuit for nuclear fusion applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Hao, Zhaojun & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "A sequential decision problem formulation and deep reinforcement learning solution of the optimization of O&M of cyber-physical energy systems (CPESs) for reliable and safe power production and supply," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Riku-Pekka Nikula & Konsta Karioja & Kauko Leiviskä & Esko Juuso, 2019. "Prediction of mechanical stress in roller leveler based on vibration measurements and steel strip properties," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1563-1579, April.
    8. Li, Mingxin & Jiang, Xiaoli & Carroll, James & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2022. "A multi-objective maintenance strategy optimization framework for offshore wind farms considering uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    9. Thi-Tinh Le & Seok-Ju Lee & Minh-Chau Dinh & Minwon Park, 2023. "Design of an Improved Remaining Useful Life Prediction Model Based on Vibration Signals of Wind Turbine Rotating Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    11. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Wang, Pingfeng & Taek Yoon, Joung, 2012. "Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 120-135.
    12. Yuanju Qu & Zengtao Hou, 2022. "Degradation principle of machines influenced by maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1521-1530, June.
    13. Zhe Li & Yi Wang & Kesheng Wang, 2020. "A data-driven method based on deep belief networks for backlash error prediction in machining centers," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1693-1705, October.
    14. Lu, Ningyun & Huang, Shoujin & Li, Yang & Jiang, Bin & Kaynak, Okyay & Zio, Enrico, 2024. "Dynamic weight-based accelerated test modeling for fault degradation and lifetime analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    15. Thirupathi Samala & Vijaya Kumar Manupati & Maria Leonilde R. Varela & Goran Putnik, 2021. "Investigation of Degradation and Upgradation Models for Flexible Unit Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Ahmad Farhat & Christophe Guyeux & Abdallah Makhoul & Ali Jaber & Rami Tawil & Abbas Hijazi, 2019. "Impacts of wireless sensor networks strategies and topologies on prognostics and health management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 2129-2155, June.
    17. Lewis, Austin D. & Groth, Katrina M., 2023. "A comparison of DBN model performance in SIPPRA health monitoring based on different data stream discretization methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Tian Wang & Meina Qiao & Mengyi Zhang & Yi Yang & Hichem Snoussi, 2020. "Data-driven prognostic method based on self-supervised learning approaches for fault detection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1611-1619, October.
    19. Mengyao Gu & Youling Chen, 2019. "Two improvements of similarity-based residual life prediction methods," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 303-315, January.
    20. Saideep Nannapaneni & Sankaran Mahadevan & Abhishek Dubey & Yung-Tsun Tina Lee, 2021. "Online monitoring and control of a cyber-physical manufacturing process under uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1289-1304, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0708-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.