IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v8y2017i3d10.1007_s13198-016-0553-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating MTTF of 2-out-of-3 redundant systems with common cause failure and load share based on alpha factor and capacity flow models

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi

    (Islamic Azad University)

  • Mahdi Karbasian

    (Malek Ashtar University of Technology)

  • Sareh Goli

    (Isfahan University of Technology)

Abstract

K-out-of-n redundant systems are used to increase reliability in various industries. The failure of a component in such systems is dependent upon the failure of other components. Therefore, if an appropriate model is not developed to take dependent failures into consideration, reliability and MTTF of redundant systems are evaluated wrongly. One of the most crucial varieties of dependent failures is common cause failure. Common cause failure refers to the failure of two or more components of a k-out-of-n system which occurs simultaneously or within a short time interval and thus components are direct failures resulting from a shared cause. Another type of dependent failure in k-out-of-n redundant systems is load share, where the failure of one component leads to increased load in surviving components, hence changing their failure rate. In this paper, using Markov chain, three models are used to evaluate the MTTF of a 2-out-of-3 redundant system by taking dependent failures into account. Model I addresses the MTTF of a 2-out-of-3 redundant system by considering common cause failure based on alpha factor model. In Model II, both dependent failures (common cause failure and load share) are examined based on capacity flow and alpha factor model. In Model III, in addition to common cause failure and load share, component repair is studied, too. In order to examine the validity of the models introduced and conduct sensitivity analysis, some diagrams are drawn for each model. Considering the dependent failures in the 2-out-of-3 redundant systems, all the three proposed models can be practical and be used to evaluate MTTF.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Mohammad Mortazavi & Mahdi Karbasian & Sareh Goli, 2017. "Evaluating MTTF of 2-out-of-3 redundant systems with common cause failure and load share based on alpha factor and capacity flow models," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(3), pages 542-552, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-016-0553-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-016-0553-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-016-0553-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-016-0553-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madhu Jain & Ritu Gupta, 2012. "Load sharing M-out of-N: G system with non-identical components subject to common cause failure," International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5), pages 586-605.
    2. Sergey V. Gurov & Lev V. Utkin, 2015. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing m-out-of-n systems with arbitrary load and different probability distributions of time to failure," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 21-35.
    3. Mohammed A. Hajeeh, 2011. "Reliability and availability of a standby system with common cause failure," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 343-363.
    4. Madhu Jain, 2013. "Availability prediction of imperfect fault coverage system with reboot and common cause failure," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 374-397.
    5. Mohammad Asjad & Makarand S. Kulkarni & O.P. Gandhi, 2015. "An insight to availability for O%M support of mechanical systems," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 462-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S. Z. Taj & S. M. Rizwan & B. M. Alkali & D. K. Harrison & G. Taneja, 2020. "Three reliability models of a building cable manufacturing plant: a comparative analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(2), pages 239-246, July.
    2. S. Z. Taj & S. M. Rizwan & B. M. Alkali & D. K. Harrison & G. Taneja, 0. "Three reliability models of a building cable manufacturing plant: a comparative analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-8.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chandra Shekhar & Madhu Jain & Ather Aziz Raina & Javid Iqbal, 2018. "Reliability prediction of fault tolerant machining system with reboot and recovery delay," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(2), pages 377-400, April.
    2. Nezakati, Ensiyeh & Razmkhah, Mostafa, 2020. "Reliability analysis of a load sharing k-out-of-n:F degradation system with dependent competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Gao, Shan, 2023. "Reliability analysis and optimization for a redundant system with dependent failures and variable repair rates," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 637-659.
    4. Sergey V. Gurov & Lev V. Utkin, 2015. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing m-out-of-n systems with arbitrary load and different probability distributions of time to failure," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 21-35.
    5. Brown, Bodunrin & Liu, Bin & McIntyre, Stuart & Revie, Matthew, 2022. "Reliability analysis of load-sharing systems with spatial dependence and proximity effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. He, Gang & Wu, Wenqing & Zhang, Yuanyuan, 2018. "Analysis of a multi-component system with failure dependency, N-policy and vacations," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 191-198.
    7. Mi, Jinhua & Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Bai, Libing, 2022. "An evidential network-based hierarchical method for system reliability analysis with common cause failures and mixed uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Wang, Naichao & Li, Mingyuan & Xiao, Boping & Ma, Lin, 2019. "Availability analysis of a general time distribution system with the consideration of maintenance and spares," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Zhang, Nan & Fouladirad, Mitra & Barros, Anne, 2017. "Maintenance analysis of a two-component load-sharing system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 67-74.
    10. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2018. "Connectivity modeling and optimization of linear consecutively connected systems with repairable connecting elements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(2), pages 732-741.
    11. Pramendra Singh Pundir & Puneet Kumar Gupta, 2018. "Reliability Estimation in Load-Sharing System Model with Application to Real Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 69-91, March.
    12. Ahuja, Anjali & Jain, Anamika & Jain, Madhu, 2022. "Transient analysis and ANFIS computing of unreliable single server queueing model with multiple stage service and functioning vacation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 464-490.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s13198-016-0553-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.