IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v8y2017i2d10.1007_s13198-017-0631-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data–information–knowledge hierarchy based decision support system for risk based inspection analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Maneesh Singh

    (Bergen University College
    University of Tromsø)

  • Stig Hetlevik

    (Flopetrol International AS)

Abstract

During their operational lifetime, the static process equipment (including piping, pipelines and topside static equipment) that constitute an offshore oil and gas production installation are subjected to a number of degrading mechanisms, like corrosion and erosion. These degradation mechanisms can significantly reduce the integrity of equipment thereby increasing their possibility of their failure. In order to mitigate the risk associated with the failure, the pipes/equipment are regularly inspected, monitored or tested using various techniques. These inspection–monitoring–testing activities can provide valuable data/information about the existing condition of the pipes/equipment and provide direction for future maintenance activities. Unfortunately, all these inspection–maintenance activities may result in a vast amount of, potentially imperfect, data that may be difficult to interpret. Currently, data from various stages: design, operation, inspection, monitoring and maintenance etc. are collected but often inefficiently used. The decisions regarding future inspection and maintenance programs are therefore made without taking into consideration all relevant data. Thus there is a need to develop systems that can effectively use the maximum amount of available data to aid in the decision-making process. This paper discusses a framework for an intelligent human-centric decision support system based on the concepts of data–information–knowledge hierarchy. Such a system can help inspection engineers effectively use available databases, information systems and knowledge-based systems for implementing risk-based inspection analysis of degrading structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Maneesh Singh & Stig Hetlevik, 2017. "Data–information–knowledge hierarchy based decision support system for risk based inspection analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(2), pages 1588-1595, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-017-0631-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-017-0631-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-017-0631-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-017-0631-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaim Zins, 2007. "Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(4), pages 479-493, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Ayoubi & Boris Thurm, 2023. "Knowledge diffusion and morality: Why do we freely share valuable information with Strangers?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 75-99, January.
    2. Vostrovský, V. & Tyrychtr, J. & Ulman, M., 2015. "Potential of Open Data in the Agricultural eGovernment," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Aven, Terje, 2013. "A conceptual framework for linking risk and the elements of the data–information–knowledge–wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 30-36.
    4. Maymin, Philip Z., 2019. "Wage against the machine: A generalized deep-learning market test of dataset value," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 776-782.
    5. Liubertė Irina, 2019. "On Social Knowledge and Its Empirical Investigation in Contemporary Organisations," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 21-37, June.
    6. Darrin Baines & Robert J R Elliott, 2020. "Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic," Discussion Papers 20-06, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    7. Tommaso Luzzati & Ilaria Tucci & Pietro Guarnieri, 2022. "Information overload and environmental degradation: learning from H.A. Simon and W. Wenders," Papers 2209.01039, arXiv.org.
    8. Raphaël Gellert, 2022. "Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 156-176, January.
    9. Luzzati, Tommaso & Tucci, Ilaria & Guarnieri, Pietro, 2022. "Information overload and environmental degradation: Learning from H.A. Simon and W. Wenders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Pop Ioan G. & Talpos Mihai-Florin & Prisac Igor, 2015. "A Transdisciplinary Approach on the Advanced Sustainable Knowledge Integration," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, November.
    11. Darin Freeburg, 2019. "The Knowing Model: Facilitating Behaviour Change in Organisations," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Yury Nurulin & Inga Skvortsova & Iosif Tukkel & Marko Torkkeli, 2019. "Role of Knowledge in Management of Innovation," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Feng Liu & Yong Shi, 2020. "Investigating Laws of Intelligence Based on AI IQ Research," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 399-416, September.
    14. Alles, Michael & Gray, Glen L., 2016. "Incorporating big data in audits: Identifying inhibitors and a research agenda to address those inhibitors," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 44-59.
    15. Rashid, Mehvish & Clarke, Paul M. & O’Connor, Rory V., 2019. "A systematic examination of knowledge loss in open source software projects," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-123.
    16. Ljiljana Poljak Bilić & Kristina Posavec, 2024. "FAIRness of Research Data in the European Humanities Landscape," Publications, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Gugissa, Desalegn A. & Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. & van Trijp, Hans C.M., 2021. "Market knowledge as a driver of sustainable use of common-pool resources: A lab-in-the-field study among pastoralists in Ethiopia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    18. Ralph Hippe & Roger Fouquet, 2018. "The Knowledge Economy in Historical Perspective," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 19(1), pages 75-108, January.
    19. Ioanna Karamitri & Fotis Kitsios & Michael A. Talias, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Knowledge Management Questionnaire for Hospitals and Other Healthcare Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Lu Tan & Jingsong Pei, 2023. "Open Government Data and the Urban–Rural Income Divide in China: An Exploration of Data Inequalities and Their Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:8:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-017-0631-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.