IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v15y2024i8d10.1007_s13198-024-02375-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretive structural modeling of lean six sigma critical success factors in perspective of industry 4.0 for Indian manufacturing industries

Author

Listed:
  • Pramod Kumar

    (Vivekananda Global University)

  • Jaiprakash Bhamu

    (Government Engineering College)

  • Sunkulp Goel

    (Teeranthakar Mahaveer University)

  • Dharmendra Singh

    (Government Engineering College)

Abstract

This paper aims to identify and analyze critical success factors (CSFs) of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation in context to Industry 4.0 (I4.0) in Indian manufacturing industries. Twenty CSFs are identified from literature and expert’s opinion. A survey was conducted through administration of designed questionnaire in Indian manufacturing industries and reliability of the factors was tested calculating Cronbach’s alfa (α) value for all responses. Thereafter, out of twenty CSFs, sixteen were found reliable. Further, these sixteen factors were analyzed employing Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) technique and leveled as per developed model. The MICMAC analysis is employed for determining driving and dependence power of CSFs. The developed model provides a platform for the practitioners/researchers to design a framework for successful implementation of LSS in view of current manufacturing paradigm of I4.0. On analyzing the data using ISM technique, the ‘Organizational culture and belief’, ‘Effective top management commitment and attitude’ and ‘Motivated and skilled manpower’ are observed to be the most significant CSFs which drive the path for proper implementation of LSS in Indian manufacturing industries. The developed model will enable the practitioners to draw the effective strategy for proper implementation of LSS in view of Industry 4.0. The results will give an edge to the management to think strategically for improvements in this competitive environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pramod Kumar & Jaiprakash Bhamu & Sunkulp Goel & Dharmendra Singh, 2024. "Interpretive structural modeling of lean six sigma critical success factors in perspective of industry 4.0 for Indian manufacturing industries," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(8), pages 3776-3793, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02375-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-024-02375-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-024-02375-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-024-02375-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashmi Ranjan Panigrahi & Duryodhan Jena & Padma Charan Mishra, 2022. "Inventory automation practices and productivity: a study on steel manufacturing firms," International Journal of Applied Systemic Studies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 195-213.
    2. Brun, Alessandro, 2011. "Critical success factors of Six Sigma implementations in Italian companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 158-164, May.
    3. Julian Marius Müller & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2018. "What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Andrea Chiarini, 2013. "Differences between Six Sigma applications in manufacturing and the service industry," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 345-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Polorecka & Jozef Kubas & Pavel Danihelka & Katarina Petrlova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Katarina Buganova, 2021. "Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Wunhong Su & Liuzhen Zhang & Chao Ge & Shuai Chen, 2022. "Association between Internal Control and Sustainability: A Literature Review Based on the SOX Act Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Srivastava, Deepak Kumar & Kumar, Vikas & Ekren, Banu Yetkin & Upadhyay, Arvind & Tyagi, Mrinal & Kumari, Archana, 2022. "Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Reza Dabestani & Allahvirdi Taghavi & Mohammad Saljoughian, 2014. "The Relationship between Total Quality Management Critical Success Factors and Knowledge Sharing in a Service Industry," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 39(1), pages 81-101, February.
    5. Andrea Chiarini, 2017. "Environmental Policies for Evaluating Suppliers' Performance Based on GRI Indicators," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 98-111, January.
    6. Menti, Federica & Romero, David & Jacobsen, Peter, 2023. "A technology assessment and implementation model for evaluating socio-cultural and technical factors for the successful deployment of Logistics 4.0 technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2021. "Democracy of Climate and Climate for Democracy: the Evolution of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(4), pages 2050-2082, December.
    8. Nuchjarin Intalar & Yasushi Ueki & Chawalit Jeenanunta, 2024. "Enhancing Competitiveness: Driving and Facilitating Factors for Industry 4.0 Adoption in Thai Manufacturing," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Fredrick Betuel Sawe & Anil Kumar & Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes & Rohit Agrawal, 2021. "Assessing people‐driven factors for circular economy practices in small and medium‐sized enterprise supply chains: Business strategies and environmental perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2951-2965, November.
    10. Artur Pollak & Agata Hilarowicz & Maciej Walczak & Damian Gąsiorek, 2020. "A Framework of Action for Implementation of Industry 4.0. an Empirically Based Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2020. "Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    12. Khalid Rasheed Memon & Say Keat Ooi & Heesup Han, 2024. "Responsible innovation and corporate sustainability performance: A structural equation modeling‐neural network approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2712-2730, May.
    13. Ľubica Simanová & Andrea Sujová, 2022. "The Impact of Continuous Improvement Concepts on the Performance of Furniture Production Processes," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(1), pages 111-137.
    14. Du, Juntao & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & Zhang, Linda, 2023. "Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Ana Teresa Tavares-Lehmann & Celeste Varum, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Clemente-Almendros, Jose Antonio & Nicoara-Popescu, Dorina & Pastor-Sanz, Ivan, 2024. "Digital transformation in SMEs: Understanding its determinants and size heterogeneity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Andrea Chiarini, 2021. "Industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: Are we sure they are all relevant for environmental performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3194-3207, November.
    18. Dr. Ali Raza & Dr. Sheema Matloob & Dr. Muzafar Hussain Shah & Dr. Irshad Hussain Sarki, 2023. "Leadership Styles And Sustainable Competitive Performance In Pakistani Smes: An Industry 4.0 Perspective," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 138-149.
    19. Bai, Chunguang & Dallasega, Patrick & Orzes, Guido & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Bartoloni, Sara & Calò, Ernesto & Marinelli, Luca & Pascucci, Federica & Dezi, Luca & Carayannis, Elias & Revel, Gian Marco & Gregori, Gian Luca, 2022. "Towards designing society 5.0 solutions: The new Quintuple Helix - Design Thinking approach to technology," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:15:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1007_s13198-024-02375-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.