IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v63y2018i4d10.1007_s00038-017-1041-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing advances in computer simulation to inform policy and planning to reduce alcohol-related harms

Author

Listed:
  • Jo-An Atkinson

    (Sax Institute
    Sax Institute
    University of Sydney)

  • Dylan Knowles

    (Sax Institute
    Anthrodynamics Simulation Services)

  • John Wiggers

    (Sax Institute
    Hunter New England Population Health
    University of Newcastle)

  • Michael Livingston

    (La Trobe University
    Karolinska Institutet)

  • Robin Room

    (La Trobe University
    Stockholm University)

  • Ante Prodan

    (Sax Institute
    Western Sydney University)

  • Geoff McDonnell

    (Sax Institute
    Sax Institute)

  • Eloise O’Donnell

    (Sax Institute)

  • Sandra Jones

    (Australian Catholic University)

  • Paul S. Haber

    (University of Sydney
    Royal Prince Alfred Hospital)

  • David Muscatello

    (University of NSW)

  • Nadine Ezard

    (University of NSW
    St Vincent’s Hospital)

  • Nghi Phung

    (Drug Health Western Sydney Local Health District
    Westmead Institute of Medical Research)

  • Louise Freebairn

    (Sax Institute
    ACT Health
    University of Notre Dame Australia)

  • Devon Indig

    (Sax Institute
    University of Sydney)

  • Lucie Rychetnik

    (Sax Institute
    University of Notre Dame Australia)

  • Jaithri Ananthapavan

    (Deakin University)

  • Sonia Wutzke

    (Sax Institute
    University of Sydney)

Abstract

Objectives Alcohol misuse is a complex systemic problem. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using a transparent and participatory agent-based modelling approach to develop a robust decision support tool to test alcohol policy scenarios before they are implemented in the real world. Methods A consortium of Australia’s leading alcohol experts was engaged to collaboratively develop an agent-based model of alcohol consumption behaviour and related harms. As a case study, four policy scenarios were examined. Results A 19.5 ± 2.5% reduction in acute alcohol-related harms was estimated with the implementation of a 3 a.m. licensed venue closing time plus 1 a.m. lockout; and a 9 ± 2.6% reduction in incidence was estimated with expansion of treatment services to reach 20% of heavy drinkers. Combining the two scenarios produced a 33.3 ± 2.7% reduction in the incidence of acute alcohol-related harms, suggesting a synergistic effect. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of participatory development of a contextually relevant computer simulation model of alcohol-related harms and highlights the value of the approach in identifying potential policy responses that best leverage limited resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Jo-An Atkinson & Dylan Knowles & John Wiggers & Michael Livingston & Robin Room & Ante Prodan & Geoff McDonnell & Eloise O’Donnell & Sandra Jones & Paul S. Haber & David Muscatello & Nadine Ezard & Ng, 2018. "Harnessing advances in computer simulation to inform policy and planning to reduce alcohol-related harms," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(4), pages 537-546, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:63:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00038-017-1041-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-017-1041-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00038-017-1041-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-017-1041-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Fitzpatrick & Jason Martinez, 2012. "Agent-Based Modeling of Ecological Niche Theory and Assortative Drinking," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(2), pages 1-4.
    2. Nianogo, R.A. & Arah, O.A., 2015. "Agent-based modeling of noncommunicable diseases: A systematic review," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(3), pages 20-31.
    3. Gorman, D.M. & Mezic, J. & Mezic, I. & Gruenewald, P.J., 2006. "Agent-based modeling of drinking behavior: A preliminary model and potential applications to theory and practice," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(11), pages 2055-2060.
    4. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, April.
    5. Rockhill, B. & Newman, B. & Weinberg, C., 1998. "Use and misuse of population attributable fractions," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(1), pages 15-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Funk, Tjede & Sharma, Tarang & Chapman, Evelina & Kuchenmüller, Tanja, 2022. "Translating health information into policy-making: A pragmatic framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 16-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Auke Hoekstra & Maarten Steinbuch & Geert Verbong, 2017. "Creating Agent-Based Energy Transition Management Models That Can Uncover Profitable Pathways to Climate Change Mitigation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-23, December.
    2. Alys McAlpine & Ligia Kiss & Cathy Zimmerman & Zaid Chalabi, 2021. "Agent-based modeling for migration and modern slavery research: a systematic review," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 243-332, May.
    3. Claudius Gräbner, 2018. "Formal Approaches to Socio-economic Analysis—Past and Perspectives," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 32-63, January.
    4. Ricardo Sosa, 2011. "Understanding the Future of Change Agency in Sustainability Through Cellular Automata Scenarios: The Role of Timing †," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-18, March.
    5. John Sherwood & Anthony Ditta & Becky Haney & Loren Haarsma & Michael Carbajales-Dale, 2017. "Resource Criticality in Modern Economies: Agent-Based Model Demonstrates Vulnerabilities from Technological Interdependence," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Lucio Biggiero & Enrico Sevi, 2009. "Opportunism by cheating and its effects on industry profitability. The CIOPS model," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 191-236, September.
    7. Luís de Sousa & Alberto Rodrigues da Silva, 2015. "Showcasing a Domain Specific Language for Spatial Simulation Scenarios with case studies," ERSA conference papers ersa15p1044, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Zhangqi Zhong & Lingyun He, 2022. "Macro-Regional Economic Structural Change Driven by Micro-founded Technological Innovation Diffusion: An Agent-Based Computational Economic Modeling Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 471-525, February.
    9. Eugenio Caverzasi & Antoine Godin, 2013. "Stock-flow Consistent Modeling through the Ages," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_745, Levy Economics Institute.
    10. McFadzean, David & Tesfatsion, Leigh, 1999. "A C++ Platform for the Evolution of Trade Networks," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 109-134, October.
    11. Luca Riccetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2015. "An agent based decentralized matching macroeconomic model," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 305-332, October.
    12. Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, 2013. "A Framework For The Calibration Of Social Simulation Models," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04n05), pages 1-29.
    13. Givanni Bonfani & Marco Villani, 2013. "Exaptation in innovation processes: theory and models," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. J. Barkley Rosser, 1999. "On the Complexities of Complex Economic Dynamics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 169-192, Fall.
    15. Michael J. Radzicki, 2003. "Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester, and a Foundation for Evolutionary Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 133-173, March.
    16. Atakelty Hailu & Sophie Thoyer, 2005. "Multi-Unit Auctions to Allocate Water Scarcity Simulating Bidding Behaviour with Agent Based Models," Others 0512012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Kazuya Yamamoto, 2015. "Mobilization, Flexibility of Identity, and Ethnic Cleavage," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(2), pages 1-8.
    18. Domenico Delli Gatti & Mauro Gallegati, 2004. "Weird Ties? : Growth, Cycles and Firms Dynamics in an Agent Based-Model with Financial Market Imperfections," Computing in Economics and Finance 2004 288, Society for Computational Economics.
    19. Dirk Helbing & Thomas U. Grund, 2013. "Editorial: Agent-Based Modeling And Techno-Social Systems," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04n05), pages 1-3.
    20. Christian Cordes & Wolfram Elsner & Claudius Graebner & Torsten Heinrich & Joshua Henkel & Henning Schwardt & Georg Schwesinger & Tong-Yaa Su, 2021. "The collapse of cooperation: the endogeneity of institutional break-up and its asymmetry with emergence," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1291-1315, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:63:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s00038-017-1041-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.