IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v57y2012i2p413-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The lower prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands: a nationwide study in Dutch midwifery practices

Author

Listed:
  • Dineke Korfker
  • Ria Reis
  • Marlies Rijnders
  • Sanna Meijer-van Asperen
  • Lucienne Read
  • Maylis Sanjuan
  • Kathy Herschderfer
  • Simone Buitendijk

Abstract

On the basis of this study, we can conclude that FGM is a serious clinical problem in Europe for migrant women from risk countries for FGM. These women should receive extra attention from obstetricians and midwives during childbirth, since almost half are mutilated and FGM involves a risk of complications during delivery for both women and children. Copyright Swiss School of Public Health 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Dineke Korfker & Ria Reis & Marlies Rijnders & Sanna Meijer-van Asperen & Lucienne Read & Maylis Sanjuan & Kathy Herschderfer & Simone Buitendijk, 2012. "The lower prevalence of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands: a nationwide study in Dutch midwifery practices," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(2), pages 413-420, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:57:y:2012:i:2:p:413-420
    DOI: 10.1007/s00038-012-0334-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00038-012-0334-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00038-012-0334-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Powell, Richard A. & Leye, Els & Jayakody, Amanda & Mwangi-Powell, Faith N. & Morison, Linda, 2004. "Female genital mutilation, asylum seekers and refugees: the need for an integrated European Union agenda," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 151-162, November.
    2. El-Gibaly, Omaima & Ibrahim, Barbara & Mensch, Barbara S. & Clark, Wesley H., 2002. "The decline of female circumcision in Egypt: evidence and interpretation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-220, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabera Turkmani & Caroline S. E. Homer & Angela J. Dawson, 2020. "Understanding the Experiences and Needs of Migrant Women Affected by Female Genital Mutilation Using Maternity Services in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Livia Ortensi & Patrizia Farina & Alessio Menonna, 2015. "Improving estimates of the prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting among migrants in Western countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(18), pages 543-562.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:esx:essedp:723 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Livia Elisa Ortensi & Alessio Menonna, 2017. "Migrating with Special Needs? Projections of Flows of Migrant Women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Toward Europe 2016–2030," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(4), pages 559-583, October.
    3. Khama Rogo & Tshiya Subayi & Nahid Toubia & Eiman Hussein Sharief, 2007. "Female Genital Cutting, Women's Health, and Development : The Role of the World Bank," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6619.
    4. Kathryn M Yount & Yuk Fai Cheong & Rose Grace Grose & Sarah R Hayford, 2020. "Community gender systems and a daughter’s risk of female genital mutilation/cutting: Multilevel findings from Egypt," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Chakravarty, Abhishek, 2012. "Gender-discriminatory premarital investments, fertility preferences and breastfeeding in Egypt," Economics Discussion Papers 15987, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    6. Nina, Van Eekert & Naomi, Biegel & Sylvie, Gadeyne & De Velde Sarah, Van, 2020. "An examination of the medicalization trend in female genital cutting in Egypt: How does it relate to a girl's risk of being cut?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:57:y:2012:i:2:p:413-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.