IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijphth/v47y2002i5p282-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Origins and early development of the case-control study: part 1, Early evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Nigel Paneth
  • Ezra Susser
  • Mervyn Susser

Abstract

¶¶This paper traces the origins and early development of the case-control study, focusing on its evolution in the 19 th and early 20 th century. As with other forms of clinical investigation, the case-control study emerged from practices that originally belonged to the realm of patient care. This form of disease investigation can be viewed as the knitting together of medical concepts (caseness, disease etiology, and a focus on the individual) — and medical procedures (anamnesis, grouping of cases into series; and comparisons of the diseased and the healthy) — that are of ancient origin, but which were seldom brought together until the 20 th century. The analytic form of the case-control study can be found in 19 th century medical literature, but did not appear to be viewed as a special or distinct methodology. A number of clinical investigations, and several sociological studies, in the first half of this century can be described as case-control studies, the most fully developed of which was Janet Lane-Claypon's 1926 study of breast cancer. Copyright Birkhäuser Verlag Basel, 2002

Suggested Citation

  • Nigel Paneth & Ezra Susser & Mervyn Susser, 2002. "Origins and early development of the case-control study: part 1, Early evolution," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 47(5), pages 282-288, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:47:y:2002:i:5:p:282-288
    DOI: 10.1007/PL00012638
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/PL00012638
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/PL00012638?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julie E. Goodman & Robyn L. Prueitt & Paolo Boffetta & Crispin Halsall & Andrew Sweetman, 2020. "“Good Epidemiology Practice” Guidelines for Pesticide Exposure Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijphth:v:47:y:2002:i:5:p:282-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.